bluesman250
Two Pair
Say what you will about Jackson, he had great hair.
Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Regardless of race, color, gender etc, there must be so many people deserving of this honor. JFK?
I want to live in your world if this is the most ridiculous thing you ever heard.
I guess JFK would make sense if by law you were only allowed to use $20 bills to pay hookers.
Most of his extramarital affairs were not paid prostitutes.
Ok forget the hookers. What about Martin Luther King? What a sham.
IF we're only going to go acronyms, JFK and MLK are obvious choices. How about FDR though? You could have a New Deal-er button and everything.
....I vote Nixon.
Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Regardless of race, color, gender etc, there must be so many people deserving of this honor.
lol, basically the very same post
I think a lot of you guys are missing the point. The biggest reason this happened is because she's a woman.
I dunno, man.
Born a slave. Uneducated, beaten, wounded. Escaped.
Went back repeatedly, freeing more slaves.
Establishes elaborate escape network for other enslaved people (the Underground Railroad).
War breaks out... she becomes a cook for the Union Army. Then a nurse.
Then an armed advanced scout and spy.
Then becomes the first woman in the Union Army to lead armed expeditions into battle. (Raid at Combahee Ferry.)
And that poker face.
All in all, seems kinda deserving, don't you think?
And?
Meaning it was a lot of feminist, politically correct entitlement crap. I'm all for equal rights and recognition and all that, but why are things like this so important?
Still not understanding the objection. What's the problem with the change?
It's the premise behind the motivation for changing it. Why does it need to be changed?