Are these really Chipco 66.7mm racks? (4 Viewers)

[Alec]

I ordered Chipco 39mm and 43mm 66.7mm racks from Apache. After placing my chips in the Chipco branded "66.7mm" rack... I'm wondering if this is really 67.7mm. I've now looked at other posts on PCF where Chipco racks measure in at 67.7mm... and now I'm concerned. These chips fit loosely... and seem to be just like my 67.7mm racks. The 43mm seems to be a better fit (even though I don't have my complete 43mm chips yet), so I'm assuming maybe the 43mm rack is 66.7mm... but their branded with suits... and not Chipco... so I'm wondering if I even received Chipco 43mm racks or some other brand. Any help here is appreciated. Thanks.

 

[doublebooyah85]

Never thought those suits racks were chipco racks but a knock off…

 

[Alec]

I thought okay I want a name like Paulson or Chipco and was willing to spend a tad bit more per rack instead of generically labeled 66.7 racks. Now I'm questioning the measurement of the 39mm Chipco labeled rack... and complete confusion towards the 43mm rack that doesn't say Chipco anywhere. I'm just wondering what I should do.

 

[BGinGA]

Afaik, Chipco never made 43mm racks, although the 43mm racks with suits are 66.7mm and fit mint Paulsons perfectly.

Original Chipco 39mm racks were cloudy and flexible, branded underneath, and just slightly larger than 66.7mm (like 66.9 or 67mm). Later branded Chipco racks were clear acrylic made by PGI and ABC using the original molds.

 

[umbkcshah]

Can't really comment on the 43mm. Would be nice if Chipco still existed or there was a product catalog somewhere.

For the 39mm, as mentioned, Chipco are slightly bigger than Paulson racks, but smaller than typical generic.

 

[Alec]

https://www.apachepokerchips.com/product/chipco-poker-chip-rack/
https://www.apachepokerchips.com/product/chipco-43mm-poker-chip-rack/

Wow... I feel like these titles and descriptions are really misleading then. Not what I paid for... and might warrant an email to them.

 

[BGinGA]

Wow... I feel like these titles and descriptions are really misleading

Not the first time that charge has been directed at Apache products....

 

[LeLe]

Wow... I feel like these titles and descriptions are really misleading then. Not what I paid for... and might warrant an email to them.

Why not just ask @Apache over here?