Best solid color progression for colorblindness (1 Viewer)

Psypher1000

Straight Flush
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
7,626
Reaction score
13,573
Location
United States
Just curious if there was a color progression that would work for tournament solids that would essentially eliminate issues with colorblindness AND still be somewhat follow traditional color schemes.

For the purposes of this thread, assume there are no denoms on the chips.
 
I don't have any examples but if you have pictures of chips you are considering you can upload them here and see what they would look like with different forms of color blindness. I have no idea how accurate it is.
 
Depends on the type of colour blindness. I suffer from partial red/green colour blindness, and one player in my game has a severe case in all spectrums. I suspect he sees the world as shades of grey. I am planning a solid tournament set someday. In my opinion, subtlety is lost...vibrant colours are the order of the day.

My thoughts based on the CPC colour sample I have

Green / Black / Light Blue / Canary Yellow / Orange

or

Light green / Black / Lavender / Canary Yellow / Orange

The Key West roulettes are close, but there are two issues with them
- the green and light blue are easily mixed up. I have two sample sets and looked at a mix across the table. They blend together.
- same for blue and lavender
 
Last edited:
From what I've seen so far it looks like there's no real colorblind-proof set based on just solid colors alone. It looks like most folks have used a combination of edgespots and large denoms to help alleviate the challenges associated w/colorblindness at the poker table.

Given that there are multiple types of colorblindness, I'm not sure that there's any single progression of colors that would work for all situations.
 
Unfortunately, I have to agree, which is why I would have to have a large easily read denom on the inlay if I ever pull the trigger on mine. That said, without edgespots to help identify dirty stacks, it may not be practical. My ceramics have different edge spots on each denom, which helps a lot. However, a few players still have issues, which is why my next set will have a large central denom on it. The key is varying the intensity. One approach might be to create a colour combination that you think might work, then print it in greyscale.

The closest practical solid set I've seen to date are the Paulson GCRs, and even the colours used there may not work for everyone.
 
About 7% of men suffer colorblindness of one sort or another; very few women do. (It's higher among Caucasians than among Asians or Africans.)

Of those who have some color blindness, the overwhelming majority are on the red-green scale (they're either red deficient, or green deficient, but either way, then end up unable to distinguish red from green.) A very, very small fraction fall on the blue-yellow scale, or see no color at all - 90% of the people with a color perception issue are on the red-green scale.

The following is a generally safe set of four colors across all types of color blindness:

(White or Yellow), (Black), (Blue), (Red or Green.)

You can get a way with using red and green as long as the red is a deep red, not an orange-ish red. Given a red and a green, people with red-green problems can often tell them apart, but won't be able to tell you which is red and which is green (they'll often report them both as different versions brown and tan)... but they'll likely be able to distinguish the two as different, as long as they aren't close to yellow. (The orange zone is trouble.)

This kind of chart gives you an idea of the trouble spots. It's not really how a color-blind person sees things, but it does tell you what things aren't differentiable by a particular kind of colorblindness:

upload_2015-11-15_12-8-29.png


Choose any two colors in the Normal spectrum, and draw straight lines down through the other spectra; if the the two colors on the other chart appear similar, those kinds of color-blind people will have trouble. For example, 600 and 525 are obviously orange and green if you have normal vision, but those same frequencies, if you have protanopia, look similar.
 
I have to say this situation is screaming out for edge spots (I realize you said solids, just sayin' like).

Also shaped ceramics maybe?
 
Last edited:
They would in some respects. In others (e.g. identifying dirty stacks), they wouldn't. I think distinctive edge spots are the only cure there.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom