Going to say slugged China clays but getting a sample set.
Maybe not slugged since they are only 10g.
Going to say slugged China clays but getting a sample set.
I don't think Angel farts way close to 10 g. Compressed mightNo plastics or polymers? They must be made of angel farts. Or compressed bullshit.
I need some more of these!
Long dead. Good luck finding why. The greens where very difficult to get when I had that set.I need some more of these!
Know where I can get some? View attachment 1348432
Yeah, thought so. Bummer.Long dead. Good luck finding why. The greens where very difficult to get when I had that set.
Fuck these lying cocksuckers. Send money at your own risk.
The brighter the colors, the higher the plastic content (and less silicate additives, which is what makes them 'china clays').Huh, not slugged. Call me surprised. And the colors aren't so bad.
View attachment 1339915
View attachment 1339916
Beveled edges are reminiscent of the Championship Series. I kinda think that was a @BGinGA suggestion?Got my samples. Just wanted to see if there have been any advancements in China Clay.
So they're not horrible. But they could be better I'm sure. I've had nicer sets of China Clay.
Quality control isn't terrible but it's not great. China clays that I have gotten from Apache poker seem to have better quality control. The only severely misplaced label on this set was on one of the $5 chips.
They are definitely less slick than most China clays. But there also seems to be some discoloration around the stamping of the mold. On some chips. It remains white to a degree.
They may just need a good cleaning because they definitely had manufacturing dust on them and all I did was wipe some mineral oil on them.
Would I pick these over my CPC set? No. No comparison. But if you can find them cheap they would do the jobView attachment 1349888View attachment 1349889View attachment 1349890View attachment 1349891View attachment 1349892View attachment 1349893View attachment 1349894View attachment 1349895View attachment 1349896View attachment 1349897View attachment 1349898View attachment 1349899View attachment 1349900
Also for those curious about their new ceramic. It's not bad. It actually has no spinners as far as I can tell. It would be great for a tournBeveled edges are reminiscent of the Championship Series. I kinda think that was a @BGinGA suggestion?
Yeah, I was involved in that chip design decision. Great theory, not so much in practice -- I was not pleased with either looks or feel.Beveled edges are reminiscent of the Championship Series. I kinda think that was a @BGinGA suggestion?
Thanks for the review. So these are less slick than Apache China clays? Apache china clays look good other than I’ve read that some are slick. Also, do you have any experiences with the Milanos?Got my samples. Just wanted to see if there have been any advancements in China Clay.
So they're not horrible. But they could be better I'm sure. I've had nicer sets of China Clay.
Quality control isn't terrible but it's not great. China clays that I have gotten from Apache poker seem to have better quality control. The only severely misplaced label on this set was on one of the $5 chips.
They are definitely less slick than most China clays. But there also seems to be some discoloration around the stamping of the mold. On some chips. It remains white to a degree.
They may just need a good cleaning because they definitely had manufacturing dust on them and all I did was wipe some mineral oil on them.
Would I pick these over my CPC set? No. No comparison. But if you can find them cheap they would do the jobView attachment 1349888View attachment 1349889View attachment 1349890View attachment 1349891View attachment 1349892View attachment 1349893View attachment 1349894View attachment 1349895View attachment 1349896View attachment 1349897View attachment 1349898View attachment 1349899View attachment 1349900
Yes I had a large set of milanos. They were not bad at all. Depending on what batch they were from they weren't too bad. To me the majestics were nice but very slippery at times. Dunes were so so on the slipperiness. Never had a complete set of royals but they didn't seem too bad from the sample. And Pharaohs seemed really nice but I only had a sample. These are definitely less slipperyThanks for the review. So these are less slick than Apache China clays? Apache china clays look good other than I’ve read that some are slick. Also, do you have any experiences with the Milanos?
Got my samples. Just wanted to see if there have been any advancements in China Clay.
So they're not horrible. But they could be better I'm sure. I've had nicer sets of China Clay.
Quality control isn't terrible but it's not great. China clays that I have gotten from Apache poker seem to have better quality control. The only severely misplaced label on this set was on one of the $5 chips.
They are definitely less slick than most China clays. But there also seems to be some discoloration around the stamping of the mold. On some chips. It remains white to a degree.
They may just need a good cleaning because they definitely had manufacturing dust on them and all I did was wipe some mineral oil on them.
Would I pick these over my CPC set? No. No comparison. But if you can find them cheap they would do the jobView attachment 1349888View attachment 1349889View attachment 1349890View attachment 1349891View attachment 1349892View attachment 1349893View attachment 1349894View attachment 1349895View attachment 1349896View attachment 1349897View attachment 1349898View attachment 1349899View attachment 1349900