Partly inspired by another post, but more because I was doing a play money tournament and saw a guy raising fairly big pre with high only hands. And it seemed to be working out for him because he’d usually be able to isolate free. Of course, that was on PokerStars weird no limit O8, so that’s a different story.
So given that there’s only a low 60% of the time, it seems to me that the causal “ace only” player is missing a lot of opportunities with good high only hands. Whether to limp or raise is a related question. And I’m sure position should be a factor.
But anyway, as for hands that have no low possibility:
I’m thinking that any aces and any kings are probably worth playing? Obviously their value increases if they’re suited or wrappy. I have to think that any double suited Broadway wrap is worth playing. Is it worth playing queens or jacks if they’re suited or vaguely connected? I feel like a jack high flush could end up screwing you as often as it would help in this game.
So given that there’s only a low 60% of the time, it seems to me that the causal “ace only” player is missing a lot of opportunities with good high only hands. Whether to limp or raise is a related question. And I’m sure position should be a factor.
But anyway, as for hands that have no low possibility:
I’m thinking that any aces and any kings are probably worth playing? Obviously their value increases if they’re suited or wrappy. I have to think that any double suited Broadway wrap is worth playing. Is it worth playing queens or jacks if they’re suited or vaguely connected? I feel like a jack high flush could end up screwing you as often as it would help in this game.