No clue lol
It shows 7.08pm tomorrow for me. I'm guessing that's GMT, my set time zone...
Does it show a different time for you?
No clue lol
Yes I have 2:08It shows 7.08pm tomorrow for me. I'm guessing that's GMT, my set time zone...
Does it show a different time for you?
Yes I have 2:08
In some ways I think it's too bad that there is so much consternation concerning which sets are "deserved" of getting in more than others based on age. If you are going to have an open vote then you are going to get what you get when people express their opinions by way of their vote and that vote shouldn't have to conform to someone else's definition of "worthy". Contreras should be in? Well, ok, sure, it's a great set and I'll listen to why it needs to be in there (and would never protest it being in), but if you ask me to vote it isn't going to matter to me because it has a giant inlay and I think giant inlays on poker chips are like hubcaps on nice wheels. The Casino Antarctica was praised by Jim himself? Awesome, I'm glad to some people it's an example of the perfect inlay, but according to my tastes and what I've grown to like over the many years of looking at and appreciating poker chips (which, by the way, goes back way further than CT or PCF) I think a Bellagio style chip is the quintessential design form and feel. C U Next Tuesday has a great story to it?? Cool, I'm a very sentimental person and that's an awesome story, but I also could never in my life have a chip set with a phrase on it that I used to hear come out of Tom Leykis' mouth back in the late 90's. So, not for me.
We are voting on poker chips so don't think I'm jumping up and down mad over here, but it gets a little tiresome reading over and over why the "right" sets aren't winning, everything from ignorance of the voters to where they are listed on the pole, and how it should be corrected. I say if some people are that much smarter and more in tune with this than the unwashed masses you should just put the sets that you want to be in the Hall of Fame in it and call it good. Until then though, if my vote counts for anything, Suicide Queens, The Colony Club, The Boulevard, and CDN get it (they got it a while ago) because they are my Hall of Fame sets out of this class for many of my own reasons and every one of them would have got my vote regardless of age or their placement on the list...and I don't feel a bit bad about it.
COME ON CDN!!!!!! @bivey I'm pulling for you!!
CDN is Chateau de Noix
Also I agree with giant inlays. Not my favourite. But the Conteras just appeal to me, the choice of colors and inlay design are stunning IMO.
That's....really strange.That's weird. I don't even have a post #6. I just checked back and it goes straight from #5 to #7 for me
Even though you found it here it is again.Chateau de Noix (tournament) - Bivey
ASM 2013
In designing the set with J5, Bivey's main goal was to create a set that made the players feel classy and distinguished. Having been a long time fan of the original Bellagio poker room chips, he set out to create an inlay with a weathered and antique sort of feel. He also wanted to incorporate his home of Wenatchee into the theme. Agriculture is a huge part of Central Washington with tree fruit and wine being the major players.
What better way to convey classy than with a fancy wine label?
The problem was that the wide reaching appeal and recognition of the budding Wenatchee wine industry was lacking. Using the idea, but with French wine made perfect sense. The FDL mold was an ideal and somewhat fortunate choice as it fit the theme perfectly and allowed for the larger inlay on which to work.
Each chip represents a different wine region of France. The cash set is composed of regions known for the white wines, and the tournament set that was nominated, reds. Bivey attempted to place the names in an official rank of prestige. Because France also has a famous brandy region, Cognac, this was also incorporated.
In choosing colors and spot patterns, he had two goals. First was to make the chips fairly complex with lots of spots, doing this to keep with the theme of luxury. The use of a white spot in almost every chip was an intentional maneuver to keep the chips looking antique – in effect to mute their colors a bit. Few day glow colors were used. Traditional base colors were used.
John Faulhaber aka J5, did the art. Chips were produced by ASM (Vegas).
View attachment 26928
View attachment 26924 View attachment 26925 View attachment 26926
View attachment 26929
We actually had this conversation! I said he should get multiple tables and make them all locations (King's Landing, Winterfel, Harrenhal, etc.)
That'd be sick.
I love the show, and like the set concept. To me, something just isn't working though. Can't quite put my finger on it. Perhaps I'm titled because i don't see House Stark or House Lannister in there, haha. Acutally, it might be the red felt the photos were taken on... Love red felt, but it's throwing off the colors in the pics for me.
In some ways I think it's too bad that there is so much consternation concerning which sets are "deserved" of getting in more than others based on age. If you are going to have an open vote then you are going to get what you get when people express their opinions by way of their vote and that vote shouldn't have to conform to someone else's definition of "worthy". Contreras should be in? Well, ok, sure, it's a great set and I'll listen to why it needs to be in there (and would never protest it being in), but if you ask me to vote it isn't going to matter to me because it has a giant inlay and I think giant inlays on poker chips are like hubcaps on nice wheels. The Casino Antarctica was praised by Jim himself? Awesome, I'm glad to some people it's an example of the perfect inlay, but according to my tastes and what I've grown to like over the many years of looking at and appreciating poker chips (which, by the way, goes back way further than CT or PCF) I think a Bellagio style chip is the quintessential design form and feel. C U Next Tuesday has a great story to it?? Cool, I'm a very sentimental person and that's an awesome story, but I also could never in my life have a chip set with a phrase on it that I used to hear come out of Tom Leykis' mouth back in the late 90's. So, not for me.
We are voting on poker chips so don't think I'm jumping up and down mad over here, but it gets a little tiresome reading over and over why the "right" sets aren't winning, everything from ignorance of the voters to where they are listed on the pole, and how it should be corrected. I say if some people are that much smarter and more in tune with this than the unwashed masses you should just put the sets that you want to be in the Hall of Fame in it and call it good. Until then though, if my vote counts for anything, Suicide Queens, The Colony Club, The Boulevard, and CDN get it (they got it a while ago) because they are my Hall of Fame sets out of this class for many of my own reasons and every one of them would have got my vote regardless of age or their placement on the list...and I don't feel a bit bad about it.
COME ON CDN!!!!!! @bivey I'm pulling for you!!
Did you block/ignore Poker Zombie by chance? I haven't "ignored"anyone but i assume this is what happens if you chiose to?That's weird. I don't even have a post #6. I just checked back and it goes straight from #5 to #7 for me
You're looking at it all wrong, infamy is awesome.Somebody blocked me?