Mental Nomad
Full House
Looking for the best, quickest, cheapest way to pack and ship 24 chips.
I'm asking for a friend.
Oh, and 12 of them are 43mm.
I'm asking for a friend.
Oh, and 12 of them are 43mm.
Nope, let the chips overlap each other at the bottom of the baggie, then roll tightly and tape. They won't move.No concerns about them sliding around inside, banging each other?
Nope, let the chips overlap each other at the bottom of the baggie, then roll tightly and tape. They won't move.
No concerns about them sliding around inside, banging each other?
I'd put them in a sandwich bag, roll the bag tightly and tape. Surround with bubble wrap generously, put in a bubble mailer ($0.50 or so from Walmart), then ship first class (about $3.00 and comes with tracking)
I'm liking this. Good process for something one might do, say, 51 times...
Nobody has asked the most important question..... what are they worth?
First Class package should be about half the Priority Mail cost - $3.50-ish vs. $7-ish. I think the limit is 13 oz.
Tried and true method for me, having shipped barrels/smallish lots this way well over 100 times now.I'd put them in a sandwich bag, roll the bag tightly and tape. Surround with bubble wrap generously, put in a bubble mailer ($0.50 or so from Walmart), then ship first class (about $3.00 and comes with tracking)
I don't like overlapping chips in a bubble envelope, one good shot and something gets broken. Less of an issue with ceramics vs clay chips, but hybrids do have a thinner (and weaker) middle section.
I think a rod spiking the package would be more likely to break a center if they were flat-packed between cardboard.
You could use a small flat rate box but you would need to use the 'offset' method or make a bunch of small stacks (like 5-6 chips each maybe) and orient them like the bottom scenario in the picture below to get sufficient padding. If you use the 'barrel' method, it doesn't leave much room for padding as shown in the top scenario.Why not small flat rate box?
No concerns about them sliding around inside, banging each other?
Why not small flat rate box?
I'm not sure the gestation period, prolly depends on the kind of chips, but even if they bang there would probably still be only 24 upon arrival.
The cost of this is also high compared to first class, especially for cheaper chips.Why not small flat rate box?
You could use a small flat rate box but you would need to use the 'offset' method or make a bunch of small stacks (like 5-6 chips each maybe) and orient them like the bottom scenario in the picture below to get sufficient padding. If you use the 'barrel' method, it doesn't leave much room for padding as shown in the top scenario.
Well is it possible? I guess so. But I don't like it let's put it that way.You can get plenty of padding on a barrel in a SFRB; the box assembles around the padded barrels and can bulge slightly as you seal/tape it. You're not strictly limited to the engineered interior dimension. I've shipped a couple barrels of 43mm chips banked with a couple barrels of 39mm chips, all wrapped in double bubble in SFRB and the package was accepted with no concerns.
Well is it possible? I guess so. But I don't like it let's put it that way.![]()
Well is it possible? I guess so. But I don't like it let's put it that way.![]()