As a host who couldn't use the last decks I have to say this sentence concerns me.
"3) The red decks show some variation in color IF you are looking for it. BUT... the color variance is very subtle, difficult to see, and impossible to pick out or track certain cards."
Can we see some pics please?
Thanks
So was the variation legit or was it "in your head"? I've looked at all my setups of every card and my mind tricks me. Is that the case here?
Thank you. Please post pictures.I understand the concerns given my review... and I wanted my review to be honest and fair.
That said, the variations really can only be seen in bright light, and only if you are really focused and are LOOKING for variations. Even then, you have to find a "darker" shaded card and have it next to a "lighter" shaded card before you are able to say, "oh yea - I see the difference now."
Even going through those exercises, we had a couple of players who were unable to see any noticeable difference whatsoever... @One Eyed Dollar and @kenny being two of the guys who didn't see any issues at all come to mind.
In play, under normal conditions, I think it would be impossible to pinpoint a card in play anywhere on the table. I truly believe that these decks are ready to go and be put in play!
However, I will be happy to take some hires pics for folks to decide for themselves.
If put the original in play, no one can honestly tell a difference .Personally, with the last 'bad' batch, i thought i could tell the difference, but then i couldn't.
I'm thinking these will be fine. I had reservations about using the shade of red picked only because that may be a factor for the 'illusion' if thats what it is.
@desjgn what do you think about the cards?
If put the original in play, no one can honestly tell a difference .
Still waiting for picturesI agree.
I think the problem was that everyone - when doing the test - was able to pinpoint the same one or two cards. That is not possible with the new run. At all.
Still waiting for pictures
Looks good to me!
In fairness to @desjgn --
I just did a quick test with my new Faded Spade bridge sized red backs, and lo and behold, their backs show shade variations! I'm quickly realizing that red is just a damn difficult color to print consistently.
One card here is noticeably darker than the rest; can you spot it? On the flip side, one card is also a bit lighter, while three are very close in tone.
View attachment 172731
I appreciate the sentiment, but I hold the manufacturers responsible any time a color is varied, red or otherwise. They do have hopefully professional people making sure that when things go to press that the inks are evenly and equally distributed on the material so that colors are kept consistent. It is tricky, but good pressmen take pride in their work to make sure a product is done right and they and the company should rectify with the customer immediately if there is an issue — especially when it is clearly visible.
Just to confirm: you’re still planning on collecting contact info for people we sold decks to so you can ship them directly?
Thank you for the reminder. I think to just simplify things, I will ship replacements to those additional PCF members you sold to from the first production run. Please compile it and if they can provide you an email address too, I can give them tracking when I ship them out. I will request this info when I am ready to ship the replacement decks. Thank you.