Casino Royale plaques: LeGold Edition (1 Viewer)

LeGold

Full House
Site Vendor
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
4,248
Reaction score
12,670
Location
Norway
So, here’s the story of my plaque journey. Not the first, or last one, but one I'm very happy about!

It all started with me wanting to organize a yearly Casino Royale poker night with my group. I started with the chips, not caring too much about the plaques (after all, Apache has them in stock so I could order them whenever). Apache’s chips were not easy to get in quantities at the time, and communication was hard-to-impossible, so I decided I’d try to get old Cartamundis instead. Yes, the quality is ubercrap, but they're original. The search for those turned out to be harder than I had imagined (and I’m still not quite there... hint hint, @ChipOnMyShoulder?), but… what happened during that search is that a little bird called sleepypiggly saw my wanted-ad for the chips and pinged me about - the plaques. As it turned out, he has original B&G versions and some knowledge about their history, so an interesting read. Plaques were not a rabbit hole I was willing to get into, but me being me, it didn’t take much to take the dive. I quickly realized that making my own design, which would be closer to the originals than Apache’s plaques, wouldn’t cost much more. Still, far from cheap in such quantities, but as a wise man called @allforcharity once said, "it's not Bondesque unless you break the bank."

And here we are, I’m happy to present you the LeGold edition of Casino Royale plaques (and other stuff, but right now let's focus on them):

20240719_005301.jpg


First, I did some research on PCF to see what had been done before, and got really inspired by this thread. MSK can do Pantone color matching?! Count me in!

Then, there was something bothering me with all the existing tributes. The circles in the middle, what colors should they be? I’d seen various representations, from green to gray (on the red plaques), and photos/videos of the originals didn’t help a lot. I was not familiar with the concept of lunettes, a feature present on B&G plaques, where these colored with a marble pattern. And, actually, transparent. Well, f***. Can’t get that with MSK, so I’ll have to improvise.

After some time, including shipping miniature versions of the originals from USA to Norway and buying Pantone samples, the journey had officially begun. Mr. Sleepy on his side took hi-res photos and detailed measurements of all the design elements on the large plaques, for me to recreate from scratch in Illustrator. Also, MSK’s two stock sizes match almost perfectly the originals, which was nice.

For the lunettes, I had to put my Illustrator skills to the test and, after a lot of back and forth, I finally got to the point where I was happy with the results for both the marble pattern and 3D effect. As colors on lunettes vary a lot depending on the background, I had to make a choice and I chose the look with a bright background:

AD_4nXdVuwtof56lrsm1hElUX2hkmHr68Q_iRG4smI3QjMHZoMMF1PdtKAAhGnWhOs0nkjtA0AKzK3MIv1mCng2MCRJght-TsHtBy5W0MDldYmu7sw18slPIOAxl6o6miOqWo4yWDu8u

AD_4nXfTMHchfmJiRpA40mMkqf4B_jzl-K_C1gArk6o1BgSa9qeqqICtgptLxY3qd3K9jixFmvCY7N4U9CJ1b6Mnn_3hxNhbRC2_zZnceePPYsI-F6eN-GCMAWRC6lWJ_591PEZCwlS-dw


Oh, remember how MSK was able to do Pantone color matching? Well, turns out it’s BS. They can’t, and it’s not even close. After a few rounds of samples, I gave up and decided I was happy with the slightly darker blue and paler red as they just couldn’t do any better (in retrospect, shipping them the mini originals might have helped, but I’m not even sure about that).

As for the gold foil color on the originals, I had to settle with a solid one which was not too yellowy. Also, you might get tempted to use the metallic gold print offered by MSK. There are two problems with it, at least for this particular design:
  • The print is VERY speckly, not smooth. It used to be smoother years ago, but the current print is not. Also, you’ll notice stray gold speckles across the plaque…
  • They need to run the metallic print separately from other layers, so placement would not be precise enough.
Anyhow, here’s some more pr0n. All photos courtesy of Mr Sleepy, to whom I owe a huge thanks for taking this journey with me and coming with a lot of constructive comments and suggestions!

Casino-Royale-MSK-28_RB_M_stack.jpg


Casino-Royale-MSK-06_L_RB_MB.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-36_RB_M_splash.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-38.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-42.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-37.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-40.jpg

And yes, while at it, I also did a travel baby version of both:

Casino-Royale-MSK-25.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-24.jpg Casino-Royale-MSK-12.jpg

Lastly, some tips to future MSK customers:
  • Do not rely on MSK's color matching, at least not Pantone (and CMYK is very dependent on the equipment being used).
  • If you are very particular on your design, do make prototypes! Can't stress this enough, as you might easily get disappointed.
  • When you pay for prototypes to be made, they will want to charge again for new versions. I’d read of cases here on the forum where people only had to pay once. Maybe their current contact has a different policy. In any case, beware of that.
  • When you make prototypes, you can choose to have different designs on each side! So, you can test 2-in-1.
  • Be careful with choosing the metallic gold print. Get some recent samples in hands that will show you what it is about and whether it works for your particular case.
  • Be very clear with your requests to MSK, and verify and question their proofs. In one case, they just decided to do things differently without saying anything (like not using metallic gold print when explicitly told to do so).
  • Straight lines tend to be not so straight after all. My theory is that the print is done on top of their uneven marble background before putting the last layer, but it is just a wild guess. I noticed the same with B&G plaques though, so I just accepted it.
  • Avoid elements that need to be centered/placed perfectly on the plaque. There will be variation, sometimes up to a few mm (whatever that might be in freedom units).
  • I noticed their printer can be low on ink or have some other reason for causing stripes across the whole background. Their explanation was that certain CMYK combinations are just like that, but I just don't buy it.
 
Outstanding! Brings a tear to my eye... The table is terrific as well. The vision is complete, it's beautiful and it's motivating me to get my butt in gear and my wallet out for those plaques....

The chips are heavy mothers. It's a shame no one's producing lighter replicas. I suppose one could make custom ceramics from high-res scans, although that's a pain in itself.

Say, you wouldn't happen to have that illustrator file bouncing around still, would ya? ;)

Congrats!
 
The chips are heavy mothers. It's a shame no one's producing lighter replicas. I suppose one could make custom ceramics from high-res scans, although that's a pain in itsel
In fact, I did make replica chips as well (Sun-Fly, about 500 of each). More expensive than Apache, but lighter and higher quality. Decided to go with originals in the end, so these are kinda available - let me know if you'd be interested and we can get into details.
 
Last edited:
In fact, I did make replica chips as well (Sun-Fly, about 500 of each). More expensive than Apache, but lighter and higher quality. Decided to go with originals in the end, so these are kinda available - let me know if you'd be interested and we can get into details.
I would have taken you up on your offer if I didn't have 700 more of the OG's on their way...



But now I'm curious, a pleasant surprise seeing a chipper opt for slugs, what made you go against the dogma when you had arguably superior ones already in your hand? Can we see a picture?
 
I'm not prone to dogmas, I like what I like no matter what other people might think. In this particular case it was down to colors, even though I prefer the feel and lightness of Sun-Flys.

Let me know if you might consider swapping, happy to send you pics by pm after I've taken some.
 
In fact, I did make replica chips as well (Sun-Fly, about 500 of each). More expensive than Apache, but lighter and higher quality. Decided to go with originals in the end, so these are kinda available - let me know if you'd be interested and we can get into details.

Quick question, what are considered to be the "originals"? Apache?
I might be interested in the SunFly replicas as well.
 
No, Apaches are replicas. Originals are Cartamundi from 2006 or so.
 
Is there a discernable difference between the Cartamundi Originals and Apache replicas?

The 200 ct. Casino Royale 2006 set I got on eBay was film-accurate high stakes denoms, but most of the pictures I've seen carried the $5/$25/$100/$500 spread.

As far as I know custom denom sets did exist but it leaves me wondering if someone filled the case with Apaches and sold it. I'm not complaining though. ;)

P.S. there's a thread floating around here that disputes the provenance of the chips seen in the film, alleging that they were made by B&G as well, licensing the design to Cartamundi as they were the long-standing maker of Bond-themed cards and such.
 
The $5-$500 was a common set available to the public. All denoms were available for sale directly as singles from Cartamundi at the time, possibly even in sets but I'm not 100% sure of the latter.

Apaches have a tad different colors (especially noticeable on the $5ks and $25ks, big difference from Cartamundi), sharper edges and sometimes unpredictable or wrong spot patterns. $500s are the first giveaway with 6(?) instead of 8 spot groups. Also, I remember some of their latest batches having a wrong spot pattern for the $25k. But otherwise they do look very similar to the OGs.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom