Good or vad poker chips (3 Viewers)

Rebelwork

Two Pair
Joined
Dec 2, 2018
Messages
447
Reaction score
318
Location
Odessa,Mo
Bought a couple off eBay. Anygood?
 

Attachments

  • s-l400.jpg
    s-l400.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 159
Personally I would be happy with denomination dice chips. But know the best price on these anymore.
 
As far as inexpensive slugged plastic chips go, these seem to be ok. I know these are available from discountpokershop.com. I don’t have the Outlaws, but I do have a set of Monacos from the same site, which I think are fine, considering the cost. I assume are made from the same material.

I believe @Darson could chip in on these specifically.
 
Here is the real question? DO YOU LIKE THEM? If so they are not VAD...........

like most have said, most on the site will look down on them, but if they fir your need, your budget then go for it, use them until you get to the next one and put them back on eBay

almost all of use started with the plastic dice chips and upgraded from there

enjoy the ride
 
Here is the real question? DO YOU LIKE THEM? If so they are not VAD...........

like most have said, most on the site will look down on them, but if they fir your need, your budget then go for it, use them until you get to the next one and put them back on eBay

almost all of use started with the plastic dice chips and upgraded from there

enjoy the ride
+1

I am all for economy chips, if they look good and aren't slippery.
 
Here is the real question? DO YOU LIKE THEM? If so they are not VAD...........

like most have said, most on the site will look down on them, but if they fir your need, your budget then go for it, use them until you get to the next one and put them back on eBay

almost all of use started with the plastic dice chips and upgraded from there

enjoy the ride

So, not vad meaning vad but vad meaning good?
 
Here’s my take: if you want an upgrade from dice chips, and you only have $75 to spend on chips, chips like these will get the job done and likely impress your friends. Once you get your hands on some high-end chips, whether plastics, ceramics, or clays, you’ll understand why chippers don’t like the cheapies.

I bought the Monaco Casino sluggos for my tourney set, because I only do a couple tourneys a year, and I didn’t want to spend more than $100 at the time. I eventually plan on having nicer chips for my tourney, but they work fine.
 
Last edited:
For sheer economy, I would go with China clay. Milanos or Majestics are significantly better for fractionally more. The only reason I dipped so low to buy a set was because I needed a limit set for 20 players. When you are talking 2000+ chips, economy of scale matters (also, I paid 5¢ per chip, so that economy of scale really added up quickly).
 
For sheer economy, I would go with China clay. Milanos or Majestics are significantly better for fractionally more. The only reason I dipped so low to buy a set was because I needed a limit set for 20 players. When you are talking 2000+ chips, economy of scale matters (also, I paid 5¢ per chip, so that economy of scale really added up quickly).
Pretty sure china clays cost about twice as much as those outlaws. Though if you're getting china clays for a nickel apiece, go for it!
 
Very few posters here will have much good to say about low-price chips.

I have in front of me at this very moment samples from thirty different types of chips across the entire price spectrum, including Outlaws. In my opinion, Outlaws feel about the same as Majestics, other than being heavier. Now, that weight difference is a big deal; weight has a huge effect on how a chip feels and handles. That's one reason that almost no one here likes low-price chips; they're almost always metal-slugged specifically to make them heavy (sometimes around 11.5 grams, more often around 13.5 grams) and are marketed to the general public as "casino weight" even though most casino chips are only about 9 to 10 grams.

But weight, like almost all other aspects of chips, is a matter of subjective appeal. It's objectively true that Outlaws are heavier than Milanos; it's a matter of taste as to whether that's good or bad. Most people think it's bad.

Outlaws feel like Majestics but are heavier, and they have a slight metallic clink sound, whereas Majestics have more clack. Outlaws feel and sound very different from dice chips; dice are very metallic-sounding, very slick, and very hard, whereas Outlaws are much less so. Compared to the Claysmith metal slugged chips such as Poker Knights or The Mint, Outlaws have about the same weight and same sound; the others feel a little more rubbery, and they have a rough edge due to mold flashing that wasn't removed.

If you like the heavy weight, then IMHO Outlaws are among the nicest-looking and nicest-feeling cheap chips you can get. If you don't like the weight, as most here don't, then you'll need to step up the price point by one notch (about double, or more, depending on where you find deals) into the range of Majestics and Milanos, or consider NexGen Pros or their close cousin Roman Times, both of which are also unweighted but which have a very different feel from Outlaws or Majestics but are around the same price as Outlaws (again, depending on where you find deals).

The mantra around here is "get samples" and that applies just as much to low-price chips as to high-price ones. You've gotten some samples of Outlaws already; now get some samples of some others that appeal to you. Then you can decide for yourself how good or vad they are. :)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom