That would be called a straddle, not a blind.No SB or BB. Ante only and button posts min double ante. Actions starts from "SB"
That would be called a straddle, not a blind.No SB or BB. Ante only and button posts min double ante. Actions starts from "SB"
If it anything like antes only short deck, there’s going to be a lot of All in pre flop for stack size below 100bbI'm going to be trying out antes with a button blind. Also going to let the button blind be uncapped so we'll see how that works with my degens. Probably not well lol
If any of you scientists with a ST1000 want to measure how many HPH you get without the shuffler then with I'd be very curious.
I think that's a little optimistic unless we are talking short-handed limit play. I just can't see a full NL cash game going much faster than 20-22 hands an hour.good dealer with fast players should be getting 35ish /hr+
yes. optimistic.I think that's a little optimistic unless we are talking short-handed limit play. I just can't see a full NL cash game going much faster than 20-22 hands an hour.
I never understood why a casino or anyone would allow a button straddle with the blinds being forced to act first.No SB or BB. Ante only and button posts min double ante. Actions starts from "SB"
He is actually saying, Straddle on the button and no blinds, UTG would then be the typical SB (but they don't post a blind)I never understood why a casino or anyone would allow a button straddle with the blinds being forced to act first.
I mean, if you're UTG and feel like upping the stakes go ahead and straddle. I don't mind.
But if you're already in the most profitable spot in the game and now you get to decide that I, the small or big blind, in the worst spot in the game all of a sudden have to act first on top of my already sucky spot for the rest of the hand when I had to put money in blind...
No sir, that is just bullshit.
Tldr: You do you but you don't get to decide when I in the sb/bb have to act.
Edit: oh I get it now. Pure antes, even the straddle is an ante and no blinds.He is actually saying, Straddle on the button and no blinds, UTG would then be the typical SB (but they don't post a blind)
So an Ante is just dead money with no tie to action, straddle means (at least) 2x the BB, and action always starts to the left of the posted straddle.Edit: oh I get it now. Pure antes, even the straddle is an ante and no blinds.
Kinda weird but whatever floats your boat.
I agree. I’ve always considered 30 hands per hour to be the upper limit of a full ring no limit game, but even that is hard to reach.I think that's a little optimistic unless we are talking short-handed limit play. I just can't see a full NL cash game going much faster than 20-22 hands an hour.
Count orbits and remember where the button started. That will at least get you close.agree. I’ve always considered 30 hands per hour to be the upper limit of a full ring no limit game, but even that is hard to reach.
Part of me wants to count hands at my game this week, but I know I’ll forget after about two hands.
count orbits, set a watch timer?I agree. I’ve always considered 30 hands per hour to be the upper limit of a full ring no limit game, but even that is hard to reach.
Part of me wants to count hands at my game this week, but I know I’ll forget after about two hands.
Edit: oh I get it now. Pure antes, even the straddle is an ante and no blinds.
Kinda weird but whatever floats your boat.
God speed - Let us know! Hoping that $750 I spent was worth something...Will make a concerted effort to track # of hands/hr this Thursday!
God speed - Let us know! Hoping that $750 I spent was worth something...
Thank you for doing this!! My group is the same way. Beer is second only to poker. Without the ST1000 even though the hands were played it didn't mean our guy actually shuffled. About 1-2x per orbit we'd catch a guy who didn't shuffle and then scrambles to throw the cards around a bit. Next thing you know quad 4's get delt twice in a row and I buy an ST1000Background:
We have a pretty talkative group.
Music & alcohol are definitely involved as well.
# of hands from last night NOT included breaks:
1st Hour 7 Players = 22
2nd Hour 7 Players = 21
3rd Hour 7 Players = 21
4th Hour 7 Players = 23
5th Hour 6 Players = 25
Only 1 hand went went fast enough to have to wait for the Shuffletech to finish its 7 shuffle cycle. Maybe a 3 second wait?
I'm not going to do it but I feel like now I need to have the same 7 people over next week WITHOUT the ST1000 & track the # of hands to see the advantage.
(ALSO thought I would note: exactly 1 jam in 5+ hours which took approx 2 seconds to fix)
10 handed and with circus games the average is around 24 hands per hour, but the circus games every hour completely slows the game down and I hate it and usually just walk away when its happening, but other players love it cause of the gamble.Good evening. Inquiring about hands per hour. I understand there are many variables from how many players are at the table to at what point of the night the game is at and if there are any players who are stuck but generally speaking:
Where does everyone think they’re at. What do you think is reasonable.
I spread a low-stakes NLHE cash game twice a week with a dedicated deal. We typically have a full table (10) but sometimes have less. I prefer somewhere in the 7-8 range but will play 5 and have squeezed to 11 (yuck)
We had a thin table last night and seated 6. It was a great session. As dealer it’s less exhausting to drive the action.
I tracked our 7 hour session and even with many, many times someone went into the tank we averaged 29 hands and hour.
I’m going to track it again this Friday as I’m expecting to have a full table.
So where do people think their games might land and how many hands are you interested is playing per hour.
I think 25-30 is probably a good range with the 25 or so for fuller tables and the 30 for fuller tables.
Ken in MN
on the ST1000 a guy who used to host had one of those, it was used once and only once, it was loud and the door kept popping up on the table which made it even more annoying.Background:
We have a pretty talkative group.
Music & alcohol are definitely involved as well.
# of hands from last night NOT included breaks:
1st Hour 7 Players = 22
2nd Hour 7 Players = 21
3rd Hour 7 Players = 21
4th Hour 7 Players = 23
5th Hour 6 Players = 25
Only 1 hand went went fast enough to have to wait for the Shuffletech to finish its 7 shuffle cycle. Maybe a 3 second wait?
I'm not going to do it but I feel like now I need to have the same 7 people over next week WITHOUT the ST1000 & track the # of hands to see the advantage.
(ALSO thought I would note: exactly 1 jam in 5+ hours which took approx 2 seconds to fix)
I think that's a little optimistic unless we are talking short-handed limit play. I just can't see a full NL cash game going much faster than 20-22 hands an hour.
Like with winning and losing sessions, poker players are going to overcount their fast rounds and undercount their slow rounds.I agree. I’ve always considered 30 hands per hour to be the upper limit of a full ring no limit game, but even that is hard to reach.
Even with no-limit play, dealers are expected to do 25 hands and hour?30 is pretty typical. When I was a poker room manager, if a dealer was averaging fewer than 25, they were going to hear about it. If they were averaging 35+, they were rewarded by being scheduled for the best shifts.
We had one guy who averaged over 40 and who would occasionally do 45 or so. He was constantly rubbing his nose for some reason though.
Ya, it's slower than limit, but any good dealer should have no problems getting in 25. If they're not, then they're not moving the game along. You can't allow people to sit there any Hollywood every hand. You have to move the action. Unless it's high stakes, then that's different. But even an Omaha Hi Lo dealer should be able to get in 25 hands per hour.Even with no-limit play, dealers are expected to do 25 hands and hour?
Well yeah, omaha is mechanically the same as hold' other than double.the hold cards. So 20 seconds to pitch instead of 10?Ya, it's slower than limit, but any good dealer should have no problems getting in 25. If they're not, then they're not moving the game along. You can't allow people to sit there any Hollywood every hand. You have to move the action. Unless it's high stakes, then that's different. But even an Omaha Hi Lo dealer should be able to get in 25 hands per hour.
Even with no-limit play, dealers are expected to do 25 hands and hour?
Ya, it's slower than limit, but any good dealer should have no problems getting in 25. If they're not, then they're not moving the game along. You can't allow people to sit there any Hollywood every hand. You have to move the action. Unless it's high stakes, then that's different. But even an Omaha Hi Lo dealer should be able to get in 25 hands per hour.
Just wrapped up. I forgot to count. But I’ll just add that as much as a shuffletech can help some games, for a self-dealt game, working with two decks is just as fast. At least for the first few hours before people have had a few whatevers.I agree. I’ve always considered 30 hands per hour to be the upper limit of a full ring no limit game, but even that is hard to reach.
Part of me wants to count hands at my game this week, but I know I’ll forget after about two hands.
Well yeah, omaha is mechanically the same as hold' other than double.the hold cards. So 20 seconds to pitch instead of 10?
I just think NL is slow, but I suppose, if I think we're doing 22-24/hr in my home game, a center dealt game could be 25.