So it actually works great for a home cash game .50/$1, $1/2 and $2/5 blinds as well as a 10 person tournament style.
Here’s the breakdown
(50) 50 cent
(50) $1
(50) $2
(50) $5
(200) $25
(150) $100
(50) $500
I'm not trying to harsh your buzz, but that's not a great breakdown and would affect value because anyone looking to buy it would have to add on to make it playable.
If you're playing a full table of 10 at a 50¢/$1 game, each player would get four 50¢ chips...I guess you could give half the players 4 and the other half six... The 50¢ chips are definitely not your workhorse chips, but 4-6 chips is too light. I think a minimum of 8 chips is optimal, but that limits you to just 6 players.
To complicate things, you have the same problem with the $1s, having enough to give each player only 5 at a full table. This is somewhat offset by having the $2 chips, allowing you to give each player the equivalent of 15x$1, but in my experience, players don't adapt to using $1's well and also, you're going to be making a ton of change from the pot/other players.
You are also super light on $5s for a full ring game. There's no way around this. The 200x$25 can't make up for not having enough $5s. And the lack of $5s make it difficult to run a $1/$2 game and also a $2/$5 game.
IMHO, a good breakdown for a 50¢/$1 game would be
8 x 50¢
16 x $1
16 x $5 (or 11 x $5 and 1 x $25)
For a full ring, you need
80 x 50¢
160 x $1
160 x $5 (or 110 x $5 and 10 x$25)
For these reasons, I don't think this breakdown works for a 50¢/$1 game. Not saying it absolutely won't work, but it won't be ideal. And because of that, the value drops, IMO. Still a cool older set, tho.