luckbox
Straight
Well, that could be true, if only ~$30k was the right price for it. When the 1st chip was bought, there were only 2 known samples. The rarity is what drove the price up. Guy probably bought it as the “ultimate” rare chip for his collection. With that kind of price, it’s probably the only one most people will see in their lifetime.
Except it wasn’t. The chance of another chip surfacing is very low, if indeed there were only 2 out there. And if a second one surfaces, what’s to say another one wouldn’t come out of someone’s basement in another couple of years? Then, with 10, 20 of these chips trading, they’re not really worth $30k/chip anymore. The bidders of the second chip knows this, hence the price did not go as high as the original one.
The reference price of this chip is now ~$16k, and people will look for a discount from that benchmark when the next one comes up.
In auctions for rare items that are in demand, most times it works like this. The first one usually fetches the best price, because it’s seen as the “only one.”
EDIT...ok i had to re-think it...you are correct but with the chip market the threat of others being out there probably never goes way does it? that is the risk, so why do you take that risk? or the first guy said screw it i dont care i want it and took the risk, and has a loss (for now money-wise) but he still has 1 of 3 ...
other markets i do agree that i dont care to purchase another after i have one, such as a piece of art....dont really care since i really like the art first and the price i paid is secondary as an investment...i guess it works for chips also
Last edited: