Shuffle Tech ST-1000 Sound Reduction Test (1 Viewer)

[InBobWeTrust]

I wanted to show the difference in loudness after mounting the Shuffle Tech ST-1000 in a cabinet, and then after surrounding the unit in acoustic foam.

Table top mode: 83dB peak

Flush Mounted WITHOUT acoustic foam: 75 dB peak

Flush Mounted WITH acoustic foam: 70 Db peak.

I know it's hard to judge by the audio recorded from my phone, but mounting the shuffler and adding the acoustic foam made a big difference. It brought the average dB level from the 80's down into the high 60's. I am pretty happy with the results.



if you are interested in my setup, here is everything I used:

Shuffle Tech ST-1000:
https://shuffletech.com/product/st1000-card-shuffler/

Shuffle Tech Flush Mount:
https://shuffletech.com/product/card-shuffling-machine-flush-mounting-kit/

IKEA Alex Storage Unit on Casters:
https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/alex-s...oogle_shopping_clicks_Workspaces&gad_source=1

Acoustic Foam:
https://a.co/d/efFC3NZ

Sash Lock:
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Everbilt-Oil-Rubbed-Bronze-Steel-Window-Sash-Lock-20322/204760750

 

[rjdev7]

Nice. I used mass loaded vinyl in mine and it deadened the sound a lot: https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/shuffle-tech-flush-mount-cabinet.95044/#post-2097282

 

[rjdev7]

What app are you using to test db?

 

[InBobWeTrust]

@rjdev7 It's an app called Sound Meter by "Splend Apps". Less than scientific, but it's a good reference point for the change in volume.

 

[MattyA]

I have one of these shufflers and was thinking that a lot of the sound comes out of the top. I was thinking of using a sound-insulated enclosure that would fully envelop the shuffler, ie with a hinged lid. Thoughts?

 

[InBobWeTrust]

I have one of these shufflers and was thinking that a lot of the sound comes out of the top. I was thinking of using a sound-insulated enclosure that would fully envelop the shuffler, ie with a hinged lid. Thoughts?

I think that idea would work very well, but how practical will that be to use in a game? If I am understanding you correctly, you will have to open/reach into the enclosure each time you use it. Sounds like it could be clunky to use, but I would love to see your idea!

 

[TheWhat]

Thanks for this, nice to have the info in one spot.

I want one of these so bad, but between the noise, and the jamming complaints, and insane lead time for delivery; I just can't seem to pull the trigger.

 

[InBobWeTrust]

Thanks for this, nice to have the info in one spot.

I want one of these so bad, but between the noise, and the jamming complaints, and insane lead time for delivery; I just can't seem to pull the trigger.

For what it's worth, these things were not even on my radar until I played at a home game where the host had 1. We went the entire game without a single malfunction and his shuffler is several years old and gets a ton of use. My first game will not be until next month. I look forward to reporting back my results.

 

[MattyA]

I think that idea would work very well, but how practical will that be to use in a game? If I am understanding you correctly, you will have to open/reach into the enclosure each time you use it. Sounds like it could be clunky to use, but I would love to see your idea!

I guess before implementing a practical version the concept could be tested by taking a small Amazon or other box, lining it with acoustic tile or other damping material, then inverting it over the flush mounted shuffler.

I have a few ideas on how it could be made practical, the simplest of which would be what I described above only with a more permanent box-shaped “cover” and hinges to allow it to be flipped open.

But it should be easy to test first.

 

[SixSeven]

Thanks for this, nice to have the info in one spot.

I want one of these so bad, but between the noise, and the jamming complaints, and insane lead time for delivery; I just can't seem to pull the trigger.

I have to give my input on the shuffler. I have had it almost 1 year, using it about once a month. I have it in a custom cabinet, no dampening. No one complains about the noise in game, every one thinks it is super cool and elevates the game to another level. On the other hand, it started jamming about 5 months ago, and it is a regular occurrence each game (1 to 4 times a night), even with cleaning as suggested with Q tip and alcohol. Also, it takes a lot of effort to put the cards from the table into the shuffler and pull the new one out. It's a full time job the whole night. You need someone dedicated to it. I usually do it myself, but it is one more thing to do besides other hosting duties. But it is an expensive machine so I prefer to do it so it doesn't get damaged. Sometimes I wish we just did shuffle behind and didn't use it - it takes that much effort. So there are plusses and minus to it. It is great in some ways but not nirvana in others. Hope this helps in your decision.

 

[TheRealTeddyKGB]

Also, it takes a lot of effort to put the cards from the table into the shuffler and pull the new one out.

Are you using the bottom drawer thingy? If you flip the switch on the bottom of the unit the cards will come back out the top. Definitely not a lot of effort.

 

[SixSeven]

Are you using the bottom drawer thingy? If you flip the switch on the bottom of the unit the cards will come back out the top. Definitely not a lot of effort.

No, I do the top load in and out. I meant, its a lot of effort to scoop up the cards to put them in the shuffler, as opposed to just pushing them to the next person to shuffle behind. And if I am not sitting next to it (like getting a buy in), someone else has to reach in to get the cards.