Shaggy
Full House
So @chipjoker and I were having a discussion here at work regarding the wear seen on two of my chipsets. Specifically the Tropicana fountains I just received (thanks @H|Q) and the California Bell Clubs I acquired a few years ago. Here is some data on the two chipsets:
Tropicana
years used 1972 to 1985, total 13
Denoms I have are 1, 5, 25, 100
The chips are in a decent used condition
Cali Bells
years used 1974 to 1980, total 6
Denoms I have are .25, 1, 5, 25, 100
The chips are in a heavily used condition, especially the 5's.
So the question, or area of discussion is this. Why are the Cali Bell chips so much more worn than the Trops? Here are some ideas.
1. Shear Quantity of chips in play. Tropicana was a Las Vegas Strip Casino and thus had more money than the Cali Bell and could afford to have more chips in play relative to the number of customers.
2. Types of games being played.
a) My assumption is a large portion of the Trop chips were on the blackjack and craps tables. Likely with $1 min bets at that time. In craps, chips are tossed around a little bit but generally not handled much. In blackjack they are handled even less... placed in the betting circle and either dragged to the players stack or to the tray. For both games there are a large quantity of chips in the tray or box. I am not aware of how much poker was played at the Trop in the '70's.
b) The California Bell Club looks like it only spread 5 card draw and Lowball poker. Stud and Hold'Em were illegal in some of California until the late '80s. Does anyone know the betting or ante structure for these early draw games? I am just puzzled at how the $5 chips could be so worn. Would a $1 ante game and betting with $5 chips be a popular enough game to wear the $5s like that?
Tropicana
years used 1972 to 1985, total 13
Denoms I have are 1, 5, 25, 100
The chips are in a decent used condition
Cali Bells
years used 1974 to 1980, total 6
Denoms I have are .25, 1, 5, 25, 100
The chips are in a heavily used condition, especially the 5's.
So the question, or area of discussion is this. Why are the Cali Bell chips so much more worn than the Trops? Here are some ideas.
1. Shear Quantity of chips in play. Tropicana was a Las Vegas Strip Casino and thus had more money than the Cali Bell and could afford to have more chips in play relative to the number of customers.
2. Types of games being played.
a) My assumption is a large portion of the Trop chips were on the blackjack and craps tables. Likely with $1 min bets at that time. In craps, chips are tossed around a little bit but generally not handled much. In blackjack they are handled even less... placed in the betting circle and either dragged to the players stack or to the tray. For both games there are a large quantity of chips in the tray or box. I am not aware of how much poker was played at the Trop in the '70's.
b) The California Bell Club looks like it only spread 5 card draw and Lowball poker. Stud and Hold'Em were illegal in some of California until the late '80s. Does anyone know the betting or ante structure for these early draw games? I am just puzzled at how the $5 chips could be so worn. Would a $1 ante game and betting with $5 chips be a popular enough game to wear the $5s like that?