No. In my opinion they are very nice card with the same graphics. But they are not Royals.Aren't those essentially just shitty Royals?
No. In my opinion they are very nice card with the same graphics. But they are not Royals.Aren't those essentially just shitty Royals?
Desjgns are probably at the intersection of value and feel for a good many of us.As plastic playing cards are more budget friendly than poker chips, I've grabbed multiple setups already before getting my second set of chips.
So far I've tried:
Faded Spade 3.0
Las Vegas cards (from a vendor on PCF)
Copags
Lot Fancy
and KEMs from the casino
I prefer Faded spade as I think they're the easiest to handle when shuffling, however I enjoy pitching the Las Vegas the most as the different surface texture makes them glide easier on most felts.
Hoping to try Desjn soon and maybe some broken arrows!
What's everyone using for their home games?
What's eevryones favorite cards to deal and play with?
If there's ever a bridge-size ST1000 variant or other enthusiast-grade shuffler out there I'd probably only be using bridge-size Angels, and I use them as much as possible whenever I'm running multiple tables.
For poker size, Dal Negro and Desgjn , although I haven't had the chance to try Modiano, Fournier, or FS products yet.
Pretty much durability and resistance to creasing/marking first, then unique/memorable designs or features (e.g Desgjn's aces, or 4-colour, or 4-index). I don't rake so when I break out nice brands it's as a gift to the players, and I use the same two trusted friends who know it and appreciate nice cards as dedicated dealers for when we go to 2 or 3 tables.Hi, SetToBean!
Just curious, if you are running multiple tables what criteria are you looking for in your cards? I imagine durability over most other aspects? I don't know if you can rakes over there but we have a small rake in our single table game so I usually hold off on the acetates in favor of more durable brands like FS or Desjgns.
Pretty much durability and resistance to creasing/marking first, then unique/memorable designs or features (e.g Desgjn's aces, or 4-colour, or 4-index). I don't rake so when I break out nice brands it's as a gift to the players, and I use the same two trusted friends who know it and appreciate nice cards as dedicated dealers for when we go to 2 or 3 tables.
I've had one incident of finding a card creased and scratched, probably due to improper peeking. Made an announcement reminding everyone to handle them properly and no issues since.
Same, have a wide variety of cards, but no Trefl yet.I wish I could source Trefl. Its probably the one brand I cannot get my hands on. Along with Statesman
This is exactly what happens when people peek at cards with the capper on top, on any deck of cards. I think within a couple hours we had to replace 2 or 3 decks. I could spot the flaw across the table. The host was not happy.Pretty much durability and resistance to creasing/marking first, then unique/memorable designs or features (e.g Desgjn's aces, or 4-colour, or 4-index). I don't rake so when I break out nice brands it's as a gift to the players, and I use the same two trusted friends who know it and appreciate nice cards as dedicated dealers for when we go to 2 or 3 tables.
I've had one incident of finding a card creased and scratched, probably due to improper peeking. Made an announcement reminding everyone to handle them properly and no issues since.
This is exactly what happens when people peek at cards with the capper on top, on any deck of cards. I think within a couple hours we had to replace 2 or 3 decks. I could spot the flaw across the table. The host was not happy.
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/poor-card-capping-technique.93623/
Thanks for letting us know. Very informative post there !
do you know what you are looking for?So anyone got a link to buy some nice cards?
Regularly use Desjgn, like the textured feel; stock feels thicker.do you know what you are looking for?
Get on @xdan ’s next GB for Statesman cards. Great texture.Regularly use Desjgn, like the textured feel; stock feels thicker.
Have the newer Broken Arrows; great budget sets.
Have Faded Spade 3.0 great texture , great stock feel, a bit too stiff to hand shuffle.
Have a set up of Las Vegas cards but they faded a bit fast for me.
Copags are ok, too slick imo.
Anyone know if Faded Spade 3.0 Bridge size is less stiff? (and if it is jumbo?)
I guess something with texture? Jumbo index , ideally bridge size.
Not ar all, I would never thought about that causing marks on cards o be honest.View attachment 1439087???????????
I got 3 packs of these and they have been the only cards I’ve run since. I have a bunch of other cards that I have yet to use.Has anybody mentioned Gemaco Superflex yet? Because if nobody has mentioned Gemaco Superflex, somebody really should mention Gemaco Superflex. I had never even had Gemaco Superflex in my hands, then thechiproom sold those Hollywood setups of Gemaco Superflex, I liked the ones I got so much that I got in a couple small orders of Gemaco Superflex before the Gemaco Superflex ran out.
Agree. I'd love to see a Bicycle Prestige come out in bridge size. That would mimic the wonderful handling of the 2012 WSOP cards. IMHO Fournier pokers are a little stiff but in bridge size they are just about perfect.Love Fourniers when they use Bicycle graphics...