Never change DaveIndeed. Also prefaced it with "to me".
Would hate to see you make an ass of yourself by not taking the time to review previous discussion on the topic before posting a poll.

Never change DaveIndeed. Also prefaced it with "to me".
Would hate to see you make an ass of yourself by not taking the time to review previous discussion on the topic before posting a poll.
You have an odd and somewhat extended way of saying goodnight. Just sayin'.Goodnight Dave
There have been several buys since the initial one, but someone burned that bridge down for the rest of us it seems with his private venture.
Not a group buy.
Why nobody bitches about the BTP circus or beach chips etc I just don't understand. Always about the boat chips. Why were those buys so nobel and the boat chip buy not.....was it because they weren't in it. Stupid.
Why are you sour? You got your custom chips. You are part of the "community" why didn't you invite the entire "community" to your buy? I don't give a damn but that is a pretty hypocritical.Because when the boat chips happened people still believed in community.
Don't worry though there is plenty of salt to go around - and it does!
Why are you sour? You got your custom chips. You are part of the "community" why didn't you invite the entire "community" to your buy? I don't give a damn but that is a pretty hypocritical.
This argument is silly. A bunch of people were disappointed that they weren't included. It doesn't matter whether it was a group buy or not. They were still disappointed. It doesn't matter whether or not their disappointment was justified. They were still disappointed.
That's it.
I am not sour just explaining why there is more hate for the boat buy than any other.
There was a true belief in community before that.
If it helps clarify, I think that person’s PCF handle rhymes with melonvest.
The guys who got in on the boat chips definitely knew what it would do to the community if most people were excluded.
The guys that flipped their boat chips for massive profit definitely knew how their greed would affect the community.
Yet everyone went ahead and did what they did. Which is fine. It’s their choice.
But let’s not pretend how much these decisions cost us here at PCF. The damage that was done to the community will last for years. It sucks.
Yeah, I don’t think there’s any real point to the group buy versus not a group buy argument. I just find it funny that some people believe it is objectionable to refer to these purchases by groups as group buys.Y’all always argue over what “group buy” means when it always really seemed to me you should be calling it a “direct buy”. When people discuss these things I think they are really trying to discuss the purchase itself, not who was involved.
I just think it's misleading, given the common usage of -- and dedicated forum for -- the term 'group buy'. If the Star chips had been a true group buy, there would have been a group buy thread. Same for the BTP chips, or the SB chips, or dozens of other private purchases of chips (some later resold here, some not) that were never listed in the group buy forum, and thus are not referred to as 'group buy' chips -- even though they were purchased in bulk by more than one person -- sometimes direct (whatever that means), sometimes not.I just find it funny that some people believe it is objectionable to refer to these purchases by groups as group buys.
I have to say Dave that I understand your point of view now much better than I did before, so thank you for that. Your definition is much more limited than mine and incorporates some common practices on PCF as limitations on the term. I don’t view public and open participation in a group buy in a thread as being a requirement for something to actually be a group buy. I think we can just agree to disagree on this one.I just think it's misleading, given the common usage of -- and dedicated forum for -- the term 'group buy'. If the Star chips had been a true group buy, there would have been a group buy thread. Same for the BTP chips, or the SB chips, or dozens of other private purchases of chips (some later resold here, some not) that were never listed in the group buy forum, and thus are not referred to as 'group buy' chips -- even though they were purchased in bulk by more than one person -- sometimes direct (whatever that means), sometimes not.
To be excluded from a group buy is generally not acceptable, as one of the primary features of a group buy is open participation. Restricting the number of participants in a private purchase is pretty much the norm, at least in every single one I've ever seen or heard of (and there have been many). There are significant differences between the two, and for the sake of clarity and not confusing new members, worth noting imo.
I guess it's about defining a term, isn't it?
I think of a Group Buy as something that is publicly posted for anyone in the community to get in on. Group Buys are done for the benefit of the community, and nobody profits unless a professional artist is used (then only the artist turns a profit).
Boat chips were done discreetly. NAGB.
Harlequin, House of Truman, and a few others were done for the owners, and just the owners. NAGB.
Sunset Beach and Big Top were done with one motive, ass-raping profit. NAGB.
ChipRoom sales, and the occasional brilliant casino buy-out are done to get nice chips affordably into the community, but for a profit. They declare themselves vendors. NAGB.
I don't see why some people want to argue that any of these are group buys. They are not. Just because it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, does not mean that you won't go to jail for murder when you shoot a man dressed like Donald Duck.
I did point out that the casino buys are done for profit. I agree that the motives are somewhat altruistic - Jim sells chips here for far less that he can get on eBay.Only 2 of the example above are buys that were done explicitly for profit.
And some of the one in the 2 ( Casino buy outs) may have altruistic roots, and compensate the entity buying out the casino. But the majority of the Casino buy outs are a for Profit venture.
For the Other "direct buys" "group buys" "NAGBs" I dont think the intentions were max profit, but if you get a large enough group of people buying something at cost, and someone offers them 8X what they paid. Even if their intention was NOT to sell for profit. Its a tough decision.
Although I agree, I have to give credit to @Eloe2000 .I like the term @Hornet used. "direct buy"
A “group buy” is where a group of people, directly or indirectly, order and purchase specified chips from a third party.
If they planned it together before ordering/buying the chips as a group, yes.Ah, so every PCF "For Sale" ad for a set of chips that gets split is a group buy. I see.![]()
Good point ... may need some refining. Strike “third party” and insert “manufacturer or wholesaler.”Ah, so every PCF "For Sale" ad for a set of chips that gets split is a group buy. I see.![]()
Good point ... may need some refining. Strike “third party” and insert “manufacturer or wholesaler.”