99 in the big blind (3 Viewers)

Is Dr. Strange the kind of player who sniffs out c-bets easily and would raise with his good-but-not-flop-hitting hand here? If we make it something like $12-14 might we get shoved off of it? Or could we make a hero call thinking Dr. Strange is bluff-raising our c-bet?
 
Remember, DrStrange is the preflop raiser. If hero bets here it would not be a C-Bet. Many would consider it a "donk" bet. (that isn't to say all such bets are bad or wrong, just that is the "term of art" for such a bet.}
 
Remember, DrStrange is the preflop raiser. If hero bets here it would not be a C-Bet. Many would consider it a "donk" bet. (that isn't to say all such bets are bad or wrong, just that is the "term of art" for such a bet.}

Ah, you're right. I forgot we didn't raise here, because I was just thinking about it in my last post.

I'm not sure I consider it bad in this spot, regardless. Is hero check/folding here? I don't love that. If that was the thought, it was a real mistake not raising/shoving PF with that kind of stack.

If we put Dr. Strange as someone who will c-bet (actually c-bet) here, I don't hate a check/shove, but it would depend on a pretty decent sense of Dr. Strange's play, which hero might not have given his current mental state.
 
I find the check-fold here, but that's because I'm the only one set mining. Anyone care to educate me on the stack size necessary to be doing that correctly?
 
Check and fold to any reasonable bet.

I mean, unless we want to "set-mine" with the intention of needlessly hee-hawing off a bunch of additional money when we don't improve. Something tells me Hero is going to do that.
 
My preference for the jam is the special case of the SB Crazy Jr being willing to call such a bet with garbage. Vs normal villains it is a tougher call. I think the stack size vs the bet to be called is not at all clear.

And keep in mind that a flopped set is no sure thing to a) play for stacks post flop or b) win post flop. Hero is 8-1 to flop a set and his likely best case would be to stack one villain for $44 more plus the $13 in dead money while risking $5. So it is an 8-1 chance to flop it but the best hero could do is 11-1. I am not even sure that calling here is better than folding.
 
Getting a bad feeling about this one...can't say why.

In seriousness though, I guess check fold is right, but I guess I just wouldn't set mine with that stack. Have to raise PF. Doesn't make sense.
 
I find the check-fold here, but that's because I'm the only one set mining. Anyone care to educate me on the stack size necessary to be doing that correctly?
The 5 10 rule is a standard a lot of people use.

http://www.tournamentterminator.com...er-mathematics/effective-stacks-rule-of-5-10/

Basically a call commits over 10% of your stack so you should either be shoving or folding...not set mining. The payout isn't enough to justify the 89% of the time your set will miss.
 
I didn't read the whole op but if the villain is going to bluff that ace often I love the 'ol check-raise trap shove (or check-call if he puts you all-in) with second pair.
 
*** on to the turn ***

Hero bets $20, both villains call. Still three way action. $78 in the pot. Effective stacks = $26. Hero holds :9s: :9h:

Crazy Jr. starts offering poker lessons about playing vs DrStrange. "what do you think he has?" " You know you aren't going to beat him" " you only have a few dollars left, you should have shoved all in."

Turn is < :7d: :ac: :4s: > :8c:

Crazy Jr checks while continuing his poker lesson.

Action on Hero. Check/fold, check/call or go all in?
 
Haha, oops, we have two villains?!? I should prob read the op...
 
Unfortunate betting strategy has put hero in a tight spot.

Pre-flop - should have shoved to possibly win smaller pot. - IMO the pot was lost at this point (with the call).
Post flop - check fold was the way to go.
Turn - I am still opting for a check fold (even an all in bet here isn't going to scare away Dr or Crazy)
 
It did seem like the hand went down hill for Hero as it progressed. Being on an underpair with a 1/3 pot bet left behind isn't leaving Hero with much of any options.
 
Hero completely screwed up on the flop by not hitting the set. You simply can't win playing like that.
 
Despite the SPR of almost 1/3 being well past the pot-commitment threshold for most hands, it doesn't apply here.

We're a 22:1 dog, and even spiking a 9 may not be good enough sometimes. We're obviously beat in at least one place, and we have no fold equity.

Save the $26 for that $200 rebuy we're doing after this hand.
 
I don't like it when a lagtard starts slowing down. Probably should have folded on the flop vs. 2 players, but now we're here so might as well shove before Dr. takes it down with a rivered Q :p
 
Shove pre. Too short to set mine. Increasing your stack by almost 25% with 99 is awesome. Can get wide calls from Crazy Jr. with hands you dominate (44-88, K8s etc..)

Check fold post.

Crazy Jr. has a monster (speech).
 
To be honest, this hand has been played so poorly, on the prior 2 streets, I really don't know what to do now on the turn. I guess shove the turn, have the good Dr. show you an Ace, and go home and read a book on poker. Time to improve your poker acumen, if you wanna play in this game.
 
Last edited:
Pre-flop shove is obvious I think. I'd range Dr Strange as something like any ace, any pair, any two broadway, any suited king, any suited connectors when he opens from the button.

Post-flop, check to Dr Strange. I'd contemplate check-shoving if the Dr bet <$15 and crazy folded.

Turn is ugh. $78 in the pot with $24 back I think. Pretty hard to imagine we're best or folding better. I guess the doctor can fold tens here sometimes and crazy can call with a 7. Given how horrid we've played the rest of the hand may as well shove.
 
*** The end ***

Hero pushes his remaining chips in the pot. DrStrange jams all-in on top. Crazy Jr. gives one last bitter speech that basically said "I told you so" and folds.

The Doctor tables :as: :js:. Hero doesn't spike a nine - so he is busted for the last time and heads off home.

I am headed out to dinner. I'll offer some thoughts late tonight.

DrStrange
 
Yes AJs merited playing Hero for stacks if required, but it was borderline. A lot depended on DrStrange's stack sizing vs Crazy Jr. because of the risk posed by Crazy Jr. He is quite able to 4-bet jam with something like pocket fives (or a lot of other things) that would make for a really difficult decision. These thoughts were already "baked in the cake" because Hero had that look of a player ready to say "hell with it" and stack off with anything that looked pretty.

So the Doctor's plan was to 4-bet jam himself over a 3-bet from Hero preflop.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom