Sprinsd
Flush
What set you would raffle? IF you decide to do one, any thoughts?Would a good old fashion raffle help us all move on?
What set you would raffle? IF you decide to do one, any thoughts?Would a good old fashion raffle help us all move on?
What set you would raffle?
... who the eff wants to participate under these circumstances...
Not helpful. Or becoming of a mod.
But now that the secret is out, and I ask is there a reason we can't drop that restriction now I immediately get ten people jumping on me that no such agreement existed/exists.
There had to be an agreement not to post these chips in the classifieds. It just wouldn't stay secret any other way. Once again, I have no problem with that. But now that the secret is out, and I ask is there a reason we can't drop that restriction now I immediately get ten people jumping on me that no such agreement existed/exists.
For those that choose to sell publicly, the full membership *can* participate. Most folks are simply choosing not to sell them (because, for the vast majority of the participants, they were not purchased with intent to flip for profit); or, if folks are selling, many are choosing to do it privately by responding to WTB adds.Now that the secret is out, why can't the full membership participate in the secondary market
The agreement to not publicly discuss the star chip actually expired on 1- Jan-2018, long before the chips were 'outed' on PCF in late January.To be clear, such an agreement not to post/sell/disclose info publicly 100% did exist before the chips were "out".
Once they were out, there were no agreements or restrictions on what could be done with the chips. Period.
The agreement to not publicly discuss the star chip actually expired on 1- Jan-2018, long before the chips were 'outed' on PCF in late January.
To be clear, such an agreement not to post/sell/disclose info publicly 100% did exist before the chips were "out".
Once they were out, there were no agreements or restrictions on what could be done with the chips. Period.
The agreement to not publicly discuss the star chip actually expired on 1- Jan-2018, long before the chips were 'outed' on PCF in late January.
It would have been nice if this was the response to the original post. Thank you.
This isn’t brand new information... it’s all been stated numerous times over the past months.It would have been nice if this was the response to the original post. Thank you.
This isn’t brand new information... it’s all been stated numerous times over the past months.
Some people just want to be unhappy...
The truth/reality just doesn't matter to these folks. Living in a dream world of drama/turmoil/conspiracy/etc. is what gets them out of bed every day.
Thank you for the thoughtful response. I understand there are barriers to getting past this coming from the "consumer" side of potential transactions. It does prove my point though, that a significant amount of transactions for these chips are occurring behind the scenes, despite a number of people claiming otherwise.
However, there is a problem on the other side as well. As I've said, there is no complaint from me regarding the required secrecy in making these buys. And to enable the multiple buys to continue over a period of time, part of that secrecy had to include restricting re-sales to within the GB. There had to be an agreement not to post these chips in the classifieds. It just wouldn't stay secret any other way. Once again, I have no problem with that. But now that the secret is out, and I ask is there a reason we can't drop that restriction now I immediately get ten people jumping on me that no such agreement existed/exists. Denial, denial, denial. That kind of response is the one thing about this whole ordeal that really irritates me. I think it adds to the sense of alienation within the community.
I know others have responded to your post. Hopefully most of your questions were answered.. but to give a tad more context of why folks are hesitant to sell publically.... a while back, a member approached me, and commented about this very issue. He’s a serious collector, rarely sells, but has on occasion sold off chips. He mostly buys chips. He explained that he had a few racks he didn’t really need, and observed that some of the frustration he noticed being expressed from non participants was similar to your op. He was considering selling his extras making them available to the community. He asked about a fair price to offer...
...meanwhile, there was a thread over on the donkey den, which was was discussing prices observed for the Star chips. The first couple posts seemed to observe outrageous pricing of $7/chip, and it was discussed (and commonly agreed upon) that folks would be totally cool with these chips selling in the $3-4/ chip range.
Back to my seller... he listed his chips for just over his actual costs, and they wound up selling between $2-3/chip. He didn’t need to sell them, but did, and well below the “acceptable price”. Well, fast forward back to that donkey thread on pricing... this member was excoriated and demeaned for selling his chips... the reason? Well, his post count was only in the 50 Range... so folks has to judge the validity of him as a chipper... They blasted him, and even speculated on the status of his marriage as a reason he was selling...Huh?
We all participate in different ways.. some have 2000 posts in 6 months, and only one set of CC chips. Others, like this member, are very active in collecting over several years, but are very private in what they post online. This member has an insane custom Chan table, has participated in several CHIP Room sales, has tons of sweet Paulson chips, but he was belittled as some random neighbor of mine (he happens to live within a mile of me...).
I had the conversations with this member, I know what his intentions were. He didn’t need to sell, and he didn’t need to start the auctions out around his cost. He was trying to be responsive to the complaints he was hearing, and tried to free up some chips... they sold for VERY reasonable amounts, and he still got flamed on the donkey den... by the same people who said “if only someone would sell these for $3-4/chip”... who the eff wants to participate under these circumstances...
Some people just want to be unhappy...
Out of curiousity, besides exact number and price of each individual chip I’m not entirely sure what other questions anyone would have that have not already been answered?@BGinGA, don't remember where I saw it, but are you still working on that timeline?
Yep.@BGinGA, don't remember where I saw it, but are you still working on that timeline?
I know others have responded to your post. Hopefully most of your questions were answered.. but to give a tad more context of why folks are hesitant to sell publically.... a while back, a member approached me, and commented about this very issue. He’s a serious collector, rarely sells, but has on occasion sold off chips. He mostly buys chips. He explained that he had a few racks he didn’t really need, and observed that some of the frustration he noticed being expressed from non participants was similar to your op. He was considering selling his extras making them available to the community. He asked about a fair price to offer...
...meanwhile, there was a thread over on the donkey den, which was was discussing prices observed for the Star chips. The first couple posts seemed to observe outrageous pricing of $7/chip, and it was discussed (and commonly agreed upon) that folks would be totally cool with these chips selling in the $3-4/ chip range.
Back to my seller... he listed his chips for just over his actual costs, and they wound up selling between $2-3/chip. He didn’t need to sell them, but did, and well below the “acceptable price”. Well, fast forward back to that donkey thread on pricing... this member was excoriated and demeaned for selling his chips... the reason? Well, his post count was only in the 50 Range... so folks has to judge the validity of him as a chipper... They blasted him, and even speculated on the status of his marriage as a reason he was selling...Huh?
We all participate in different ways.. some have 2000 posts in 6 months, and only one set of CC chips. Others, like this member, are very active in collecting over several years, but are very private in what they post online. This member has an insane custom Chan table, has participated in several CHIP Room sales, has tons of sweet Paulson chips, but he was belittled as some random neighbor of mine (he happens to live within a mile of me...).
I had the conversations with this member, I know what his intentions were. He didn’t need to sell, and he didn’t need to start the auctions out around his cost. He was trying to be responsive to the complaints he was hearing, and tried to free up some chips... they sold for VERY reasonable amounts, and he still got flamed on the donkey den... by the same people who said “if only someone would sell these for $3-4/chip”... who the eff wants to participate under these circumstances...
Some people just want to be unhappy...
This is gross treatment and I totally disagree with it. Be civil or GTFO is a good mantra.
I can't say I'm surprised though. I think a lot of the hurt folks felt was due to exactly this type of situation. Someone relatively unknown by the community who doesn't really participate (I'm judging based on post count alone) was included in the GB; while others who might be newer to the game but are much more involved on PCF were left in the dark. I don't personally feel this way, but I can understand those who do.
However, to be clear, I don't believe anyone deserves the kind of treatment this member did. I can also totally understand participants not wanting to sell publically. I feel I would likely react in the same way.
Thanks for sharing.
BS. Everybody has a right to state their opinion, even if it's one with which I (or you) do not agree. Are you actively TRYING to lose members?
Let discussions run their course, so long as they are civil. This is a DISCUSSION board.
Were the RT posts above yours deleted/resurrected?Alright, what happened to the @RainmanTrail post?
@Tommy @Jeff @Trihonda @Payback --- deleting posts that do not violate any TOS with no explanation is not cool, and won't fly without repercussions.