Cash games: small blind = big blind? (1 Viewer)

600 ct cash game set that I have...

200 x 25c
300 x $1
80 x $5
20 x $20

Spreads low stakes games easily. I have virtually no use for the $20s, but they are oversized in this particular set so I wanted them. It also boosted the bank to $800 total, which I would not need for a low stakes game currently, but who knows what the future will bring.
 
600 ct cash game set that I have...

200 x 25c
300 x $1
80 x $5
20 x $20

Spreads low stakes games easily. I have virtually no use for the $20s, but they are oversized in this particular set so I wanted them. It also boosted the bank to $800 total, which I would not need for a low stakes game currently, but who knows what the future will bring.

Yeah, but my primary game that I'm trying to cover is the $0.50/$1.00, which has a $100 max buy-in and usually involves several rebuys. Usually 6-8 players, so need a much bigger bank than that.
 
It's easier and healthier (especially as you grow older) to carry 2 of 600:D
Seriously, with 1200 chips, 100-120 of which ND, you could spread anything from 0.05/0.05 (with denominations representing dimes in that case) to $5/5 for 10 players.;)
An impressive 1:100 range of stakes, inflation-proof, huge owner sucess or bankruptcy-proof , climate and practically any change- proof.:)
 
Honestly I love quarters for my low stakes/low buy in games ($40 typical buyin) and advocate hard for quarters all day everyday...unless you’re building a true PCA set and want to get some of the best fracs in existence in play. I can/and do make an exception for those fiddy centers.
Too funny. I made the same exception for my PCA limit set. I have absolutely no use for the rack of $0.50s (no antes, no stud in my game) but I had to have the beautiful mint rack just because...
 
So finally convinced myself that quarters were the way to go and went to put my order in for some Majestics, and the quarters are out of stock until November!!! lol

I guess I have to go with Rounders now :O
 
my primary game that I'm trying to cover is the $0.50/$1.00, which has a $100 max buy-in and usually involves several rebuys. Usually 6-8 players,

600 chips will work for most sane 50c/$1 games:

100 x 25c
200 x $1
200 x $5
80 x $20
20 x $100
-------------
600 chips, $4825 bank ($600+ per player for 8 players)
 
600 ct cash game set that I have...

200 x 25c
300 x $1
80 x $5
20 x $20

Spreads low stakes games easily. I have virtually no use for the $20s, but they are oversized in this particular set so I wanted them. It also boosted the bank to $800 total, which I would not need for a low stakes game currently, but who knows what the future will bring.

Clearly games vary wildly. Our low stakes .25/.50 game starts with 250bb buyins. If we have a full table, that is $1250 in initial buy ins alone on a full table. We like to play deep stacks, it makes the game more challenging. Starting stacks is a stack of each .25/1/5 per player. that is 200 of each chip for a full table. Now add 300 more 5s for rebuys, 80 x 20s or 25s and 20 x 100s for a great 1000 chip set that fits in a 1000 chip birdcage.
 
Clearly games vary wildly. Our low stakes .25/.50 game starts with 250bb buyins. If we have a full table, that is $1250 in initial buy ins alone on a full table. We like to play deep stacks, it makes the game more challenging. Starting stacks is a stack of each .25/1/5 per player. that is 200 of each chip for a full table. Now add 300 more 5s for rebuys, 80 x 20s or 25s and 20 x 100s for a great 1000 chip set that fits in a 1000 chip birdcage.

Yeah, my .25/.50 game ($20 min $100 max) would nearly exhaust the bank before the first hand was dealt. :dead:
 
You will be stuck with whatever denominations you order. I can tell you after having hosted a 25/.50 game with a smaller buy-in of $40 to 60 that all of the players in my group welcomed the change to .50/.50.

Why would anyone order a .50 chip for a $1/$3 game?
 
Maybe i shouldn't be limiting myself to a 600 ct set, but i picked that number for a couple of reasons: a) to fit nicely in a 600 ct birdcage; b) to keep initial cost down.
I've been in this mindset for a good year.. And every time, and every way I tried to build a set, it did not work, sooo I went fudge it!
Bought alot of chips, now counting about 1900
Bought a pelican look a lile box with room for 12-1400 chips.
Can't say I regret it..

Gotta add, I host mixed games.
anyways, just saying :)
 
It's very tough to build a good 600ct set that will spread a wide range of stakes.

Add another 100ct chips:

25c x 200
1 x 200
$5 x 200
$25 x 60
$100 x 40

is a reasonable breakdown to spread anywhere up to a relatively loose single table 1/1 game.

Round it off to 800ct to be safe:

25c x 200
1 x 200
$5 x 200
$25 x 160
$100 x 40

Might as well round it out to 1000ct to fill a bird cage (plus MOAR 5s!) (this is probably my favorite most flexible breakdown):

25c x 200
$1 x 200
$5 x 400
$25 x 160
$100 x 40

You see how things escalate quickly around here...
 
It's not about escalation. It's about versatility. For $234, you get a vehicle that handles one set of stakes well, and maybe a second spread kind-of well. It's like the Suzuki Samurai. Good on the road, capable off-road, but was prone to failures (like rolling over).

For $79 more you get a vehicle that can spread .25-.25 thru $1-$1. It's like a car that goes off-road with ease, and can plow through 5' deep standing water.

Now, if you'd like to step over here to this 1200 chip vehicle, we can talk about a car than can also fly...
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom