Not O8. But doesn't change that there is a burn, flop, burn, turn , no burn, river
There’s two extra cards. One burn before the flop. One burn before the turn. No river burn.
We've played these games with burns before the flop and river only. Mandatory use of a cut card, obv.
I'm assuming this is Omaha high-only. As such it's a fold from me. Unless you hit quads you're looking at making underfulls or non-nut straights and those are chip burners
Seeing a lot of people worried ( maybe justifiably) about ubderfulls.
And it's starting to make everyone look like nits playing only for the nut nut
Seeing a lot of people worried ( maybe justifiably) about ubderfulls.
And it's starting to make everyone look like nits playing only for the nut nut
Seeing a lot of people worried ( maybe justifiably) about ubderfulls.
And it's starting to make everyone look like nits playing only for the nut nut
I can’t. Well, at least that one time.I agree, theres almost nothing worse than flopping an under boat, and knowing it.
As loose as some may think my call is, i can tighten up and fold a boat in that situation post flop.
Regarding skipping the burn before the turn v. the river . . .
The purpose of the burn is to keep the next card in play from being seen in the unlikely but non-zero chance that a player might be able to determine that card based on a mark or flaw. The goal is to keep that card from being seen for as long as possible.
I'm in the camp who think that it's more important to protect the often-game-changing river card than it is to protect the turn card. This is also the reason that we don't pre-deal the board face down (in which burn cards are just silly).
Except for the initial deal, a card should be burned before each dealer motion. For multiple boards, it's burn, flop cards, action, burn, turn cards, action, burn, river cards, action.
If we are worried about running out of cards during the hand we could quit coming up with game variants that have multiple boards, lots of extra hole cards & split pots just to satisfy everyone's need for more action.....
....ducks
Or maybe we need to stop jamming so damn many people onto a poker tabe.If we are worried about running out of cards during the hand we could quit coming up with game variants that have multiple boards, lots of extra hole cards & split pots just to satisfy everyone's need for more action.....
....ducks
Or maybe we need to stop jamming so damn many people onto a poker table.
The purpose of the burn is to keep the next card in play from being seen in the unlikely but non-zero chance that a player might be able to determine that card based on a mark or flaw.
this is all great, but Damnit ... where are the results and affected players !!!
Extremely helpful if using @#$&ano produced cards.
I think he said somewhere earlier in the thread that it was someone who did fold 66322 preflop and would have made quads during the hand. So not much to talk about if that's the case.
ahhh .. .yeah ... that post. I may have just skimmed over that. sorry...
this is all great, but Damnit ... where are the results and affected players !!!
Pot.
(but seriously, fold)