Venturalvn
Full House
On display. Every day. All the time. Still have thousands in Warneke boxes and Matsui racks...so...I guess I'm a little of everything.
There's plenty of members that have your exact experience...no damage for years, with multiple racks stacked on each other.Dammit!! This annoys me every time this comes up.
Some people are concerned. They make you think, maybe, maybe, maybe. I have none of these concerns. I have chips in racks five tall that have no evidence of warping or indentations and have done this with sets since 2007. ASM/CPC, Paulson, no problems.
if the chips are in a properly fitting rack, stored indoors in a well temperature controlled location (no high heat, no storage lockers), you won't have problems. A single chip in the bottom rack is only supporting the weight of four chips and a fraction of the weight of the rack itself.
You feel the weight of a rack of chips and worry about the poor chips underneath, but it's a very small amount of weight if it's properly distributed with a good rack. No need for anything fancy, no need for expensive covered racks.
These confirmed my worries, even if the chance is 0.1%.There's plenty of members that have your exact experience...no damage for years, with multiple racks stacked on each other.
And yet, there's this:
View attachment 1081841
From this post:
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/thre...-in-acrylic-chip-racks-bad.73862/post-1498438
And then there was @Tommy 's experience:
View attachment 1081842
from this post:
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/long-term-storage.48967/post-961785
Even if the possibility for damage is remote, I'm not taking any chances.
And covered racks at $2.80 from @justincarothers group buys are nicely affordable.
I don’t believe two pictures suggest the chance is 0.1%. Weigh those two pictures against a half century of collectors, but more importantly every casino with clay chips, storing their chips in stacked traditional racks - it’s a non-issue as far as I’m concerned.These confirmed my worries, even if the chance is 0.1%.
I preferred to take no chances as well especially when it would only cost me $2.40 usd each due to saving from shipping since I am located in Asia
0% is still better than 1 in a million for meI don’t believe two pictures suggest the chance is 0.1%. Weigh those two pictures against a half century of collectors, but more importantly every casino with clay chips, storing their chips in stacked traditional racks - it’s a non-issue as far as I’m concerned.
But if collectors want to buy fancy new racks or store their chips in humidors or impact-proof, water-proof, pressure-proof over-padded cases, well, that’s what collectors do.
Your cabinet counts seem to have grown, I remember there’s only 2 last timeAlways in covered racks, in birdcages, in cabinets ... either that, or under my pillow.
You’re right, the overwhelming majority of people that store using stacked acrylic racks never have an issue. The very small percent chance of damage happening, I couldn’t say…but neither could anyone else. But it’s not zero.I don't disagree that damage can happen when stacking. What bugs me is some of the fear-inducing replies I see whenever this question comes up, and it happens often. My comments were that properly fitting racks and stored in a proper environment shouldn't cause this type of damage.
The first thread said 10 years racked and stacked. Maybe it's the very long time involved there with nothing else changing to those chips? I know all my sets see play and chips get "rotated" around, so maybe that's all that's necessary to keep that from happening.
The second thread that you link to even has the vast majority of responses there stating what I have, that they have had no problems.
In a vacuum and with no other information, it's hard to know how the damage demonstrated happened. For long term storage, there might very well be things to consider, but I have a hard time believing that chips in normal use stored in racks would begin to show this unless put under duress again either from poor fitting racks and/or warm temperatures where they're being stored. I guess it's some of the fear-mongering around what sure seems to me to be a rare and generally unlikely event has people concerned about something more than is probably necessary.
It's like worrying about dying in an airplane accident when you are much more likely to do so in a car crash. You just only hear about the airplane accidents.
Dude, trigger warning please.Avoids all risk of rack marks.
View attachment 1081867
Yes, I have a problem. I called 1-800-PCF-CHIP and someone named "Jim" from "TCR" answered, and I got into more trouble.Your cabinet counts seem to have grown, I remember there’s only 2 last time
I might know a chip rehab centreYes, I have a problem. I called 1-800-PCF-CHIP and someone named "Jim" from "TCR" answered, and I got into more trouble.
But good memory! It has grown to three, and they're all full. Looking at getting a 4th...
Really love this setup. Right now Apache is my gold standard but when I get a nice set that stays at home, this is the goal.
Converted silverware box
Good evening.
How do you store your chips?
I’ve got them in regular racks sitting on top of one another like they would be in the casinos.
Is this bad for the chips? Does this create a higher potential to warp the chips? Is there a better way? Should I be looking to upgrade to those Apache enclosed racks?
Someone tell me. Thanks.
Those cards look like they will cause flat edges to the inner barrels over time.Here you go!
Padded on the bottom, padded on top, dense foam rubber trays, and a cotton ball between each chip. Ultimate protection for your Paulsons!!!
View attachment 1082115
Here you go!
Padded on the bottom, padded on top, dense foam rubber trays, and a cotton ball between each chip. Ultimate protection for your Paulsons!!!
View attachment 1082115