.... playing in a "normal" game I am a little to pushy for my own good and I over-value one pair hands....
I think in retrospect knowing everyone folded it is easy to second guess. Like Doc said, however, the board was super coordinated and I dont think you want to anyone calling cheaply here.Well, we know Crazy should have folded pre-flop. I suspect our calling station is in the same boat, on autopilot sitting on a big stack. Any bet on any street large enough to matter is going to get them to realize they're really overdue for a fold. The exception would be if they somehow pull ahead of the set on the turn or river. No upside for giving them the chance, with a smallish risk of a big loss.
What's hero's read on a raise to $30 ($15 on top)? If Crafty 3-bets, does his table image get calls from the other two?
This session is an outlier - Hero left a mark on several villains with "cooler" type hands and it affected their play. Most nights Crazy calls a $60 raise with top pair.
I don't think Hero did a good job adjusting to the table dynamics. Hero should have taken better advantage of the table's willingness to fold to aggression.
DrStrange
Not if he plays his other hands the same way (ovepairs, draws, throw in the occasional bluff). In the long view, take advantage of that position (you were the button raiser in a muti-way pot and are raising over a small donk-be). You aren't always going to flop a set with the same pre-flop bet and position.I don't think it's a bad play by any means, but it's interesting to think about Doc's table image here. If his pot size raise gets treated like a monster hand every time by multiple loose players, isn't he playing face up already when he makes that bet with the set? How should he take advantage of it next time? ABC TAG poker might not be the best approach at this table if Doc is viewed as the boogeyman.