Gonna be some "Emperor's New Clothes" syndrome going on, but like others said if people pay they're worth it. Consider it a toy, an art form, collector's piece, whatever you'd like. Clearly, in your mind, they're not worth it for that amount of money and that's alright. To other's, they are.What makes the Tiger Palace chips so special? Some are going for close to 1K a Rack and to me that is insane.
Underpriced or undersupplied?I could argue some of the Tiger chips were underpriced as the secondary market is clearly showing.
Definitely two sides of the same coin. I personally think there are other denoms in short supply on the secondary market right now but yes in general many of us are maniacs.Underpriced or undersupplied?
Not sure there’s a difference, but I assume it’s the cash $5s that are blowing up? If that’s the case, that’s just because we’re maniacs with how many $5s we all think we need.
No one needs more than 200 $5's for a single table cash set, no matter the stakes, and that's a hill I'm willing to die on.Underpriced or undersupplied?
Not sure there’s a difference, but I assume it’s the cash $5s that are blowing up? If that’s the case, that’s just because we’re maniacs with how many $5s we all think we need.
Oh boy here we go.No one needs more than 200 $5's for a single table cash set, no matter the stakes, and that's a hill I'm willing to die on.
Right, more than two racks is a luxury but not an absolute need. Get those upper denoms into play, I say!Oh boy here we go.
I’ll agree that for my .25/.50 game, I don’t NEED more than two racks of $5s. I have three racks and I might like a fourth, but that’s all luxury. But for $1/1 or $1/2, you’re really pushing the limits of that word “need.” Could those games be played with only two racks of $5s? Maybe. I’ve never tried. Only one barrel per player? It would stink.
Answer to OP’s title question: No.
And there’s a reason the total chip counts are secret.
There is context for some purchases though. I misread the listing for my limit set, I read it as "There are two available limit sets, white and yellow".Underpriced or undersupplied?
Shit!!! I agree with you.Weren’t some of these chips priced as high as $1600 per rack?
In my opinion, no they’re not. But we all have opinions, right? I like more traditional colors. I do like some bright colors here and there, but every chip in the set looking radioactive? Not for me. If you do like your chips so bright you should be handing out sunglasses at the door? Yeah, they’re probably worth it. Especially if you want a full set with matching factory inlays.
I’d rather spend my money on leaded chips with textured inlays. But that’s easier said than done, and a lot of people don’t like waiting around or building in pieces. That’s half the hobby for me. But if you want instant gratification, yeah, there’s another check in the Tiger column.
Honestly, if you want mint Paulsons, you can probably get a set from the chiproom several times a year, at 25% the price. And they’ll play just as well. I would never suggest to anybody that the tigers are “worth their price.” But if you like them and you have $5k-$10k to blow, sure, what the hell.
A poker chip set that costs several thousand dollars is also a luxury but here we are...Right, more than two racks is a luxury but not an absolute need. Get those upper denoms into play, I say!
It's a non issue. We have $25s and $100s for a reason for higher stakes. More chip can me more fun, but definitely dont need more than 2 racks imo.Oh boy here we go.
I’ll agree that for my .25/.50 game, I don’t NEED more than two racks of $5s. I have three racks and I might like a fourth, but that’s all luxury. But for $1/1 or $1/2, you’re really pushing the limits of that word “need.” Could those games be played with only two racks of $5s? Maybe. I’ve never tried. Only one barrel per player? It would stink.
Wrong! 4 racks, minimum.No one needs more than 200 $5's for a single table cash set, no matter the stakes, and that's a hill I'm willing to die on.
As for OPs question: leave while you still can.
And I could argue that some of them were (are) overpriced as they are sitting at 'original' prices.I could argue some of the Tiger chips were underpriced as the secondary market is clearly showing.
lol it’s been a month. These chips could likely sell for years at this price.And I could argue that some of them were (are) overpriced as they are sitting at 'original' prices.
I'm not arguing there isn't a market for them at these prices -- there certainly is. But to me, it seems the supply of some of these chips currently exceeds the demand.lol it’s been a month. These chips could likely sell for years at this price.
And with no $1s, $5s, $100s (sold out) it’s tougher to build a cash set or tourney set now.
The inventory appeared to turn in less than 45 days. I’m grading that as a huge success. The $1-$5-$100 are all sold out. Could he be holding back some reserves? Sure. That would be great inventory mgmt…if he still has/had doubled what he started with he would still be selling. Assumption and his hints have been he’s down to his reserves.I'm not arguing there isn't a market for them at these prices -- there certainly is. But to me, it seems the supply of some of these chips currently exceeds the demand.
Is it clear that the 1s 5s and 100s are sold out? I haven't been following the threads that closely (the chips are gorgeous but far out of my price range) but the wording is vague. I understand that some are listed as sold out, but in the OP of the sale it states that some racks may be held back, or something similar.
Safe to say those who bought the chips will say they are worth the price and most of those who didn't will say they are not?