What should a new chipper buy (3 Viewers)

Another aspect is that a $300 investment in new china clays will return about $250 or less when it comes time to sell..... vs a typical resale value of $350 (or higher) when buying new Paulson chips. View from a long-term perspective, you're essentially throwing away $100 when spending that $300 on china clays.

If you are in the US, that's true

If you are not, the shipping and import costs make that a much closer call, especially if you get free shipping on domestic cc's.

The sales tax and shipping charges (and if they kill NAFTA, duty) when crossing borders can be substantial for higher end sets. And don't get me started on exchange rates...
 
If you are in the US, that's true

If you are not, the shipping and import costs make that a much closer call, especially if you get free shipping on domestic cc's.

The sales tax and shipping charges (and if they kill NAFTA, duty) when crossing borders can be substantial for higher end sets. And don't get me started on exchange rates...
This 100%.
finacial decisions are always, going to be involved, but many people sell themselves short...my first sets came from SAMs club ....less than20 cents a chip,... I bought six sets to play with and resell... They had the Wpt logo, they must be good.if this is your budget then by all means buy them up ...they are certainly better than plastic bicycle chips I grew up with. The Wpt chips were great value. They did not stack well, they didn't fit in racks ,they we hard to count, they didnt pretend to be casino quality, they were still a good deal., I played at least one cash game with them. I doubled my money when I sold the cases and all. In a pinch I d do it again. But a luxury once tasted is a necessity . My cpc chips do everything I want in regard to poker chips. I have only one source, but I believe the were in casino use into the late 80's. If you can afford to gamble I think you can afford real chips, thier predesigned chips can be had for 1.57 to 2 dollars each. What a deal. Where as China clays are made in China and it shows. I think the word clay is misleading. I also think that made in the USA is important. I can hardly believe they are so cheap for the quality. I hope they Tay in business for a long time
All that being said if you want cheaper chips that you will probably want to replace later then check out the reviews on utube about so called China clays. Some are really better than others. The top ten 2017 list is very good. I do not condon gambling beyond your entertainment budget. Same with chip purchases. Its your money , spend it wisely.
S
 
The Wpt chips were great value. They did not stack well, they didn't fit in racks ,they we hard to count, they didnt pretend to be casino quality, they were still a good deal.,

I'm not sure if you're being serious or not. If there's nothing good about them except the price, then there's nothing good about them.
 
Even their cost was too high, imo -- much better chips available in that price range, then and now. If they were labeled XYZ instead of WPT, nobody would have bought them....
 
Even their cost was too high, imo -- much better chips available in that price range, then and now. If they were labeled XYZ instead of WPT, nobody would have bought them....
I was talking about the old wpt chips only to say cheap is almost always junk. I say use coins if you can't buy quality. And never cross the line into something you can't afford. You can get different colors of CPC chips with no decoration for even less than 90 cents each. If you can't afford chips. You probably can't afford to be gambling.
 
Last edited:
Where are these great 20 cent chips you speak of, please provide links. Tell me all about their security features .how well they stack. How high the quality control standards are. What country they are make in?
 
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not. If there's nothing good about them except the price, then there's nothing good about them.
No there was not really any thing good . They were usable. I didn't enjoy using them but apparently most of America on looks at price
 
Even their cost was too high, imo -- much better chips available in that price range, then and now. If they were labeled XYZ instead of WPT, nobody would have bought them....
You are correct about Wpt brand making them more saleable
 
To anyone I may have offended with these posts I apologize . I am new here and should probably keep mt mouth shut and soak up the wisdom offered.
 
To anyone I may have offended with these posts I apologize . I am new here and should probably keep mt mouth shut and soak up the wisdom offered.
No offense taken.
What you say about the CPC stock chips is an interesting topic to me.
I guess they're a good deal if you're looking for mint clay chips AND either you really like the design or you're concerned about resale values.
CPC makes great chips. But for me personally, I'd rather spend the same money on reasonably used casino Paulsons than new stock CPC's.
If I was going to buy CPC's, I'd rather design my own custom chips, which can be done for about the same money. But as I alluded earlier, I'd lose more money reselling them than I would with stock chips (because nobody's gonna pay much for upNDown's Poker Cellar chips)
 
Hi PCF,

I recently developed my interest in chips, although I've been playing poker for years.
I was always told that Paulson chips are great, but do you guys think a new chipper like me, who have only owned "Dice chip" before, should buy a set of Paulson?

Really, only you can answer that. I hope I'll give you some info that will lead you to your answer. There is a lot of good info on here. Before you do anything, here's some things to consider.

Are you looking for cash, tournament, or both? If both, you should be looking for two sets.
My advice is not to try for a multi-use set. There are way too many issues. If you only play one or the other, only get chips for what you play.

I've not played cash in a long time, so I focus on tournament sets.

I have a cash set I have never played with. I'm glad I got it, and am looking forward to playing with it, but just haven't played a cash game in a while. I wouldn't buy a second cash set without regularly playing cash games and seeing a different need for a cash set unless I played often enough for the variety is the spice of life argument to prevail on me to get a second cash set.

How many chips do you need?
Do you like a mountain of chips for every player, or do you think 10-20 per player per denom for most denoms is enough?

If you are buying for a 3-5 table tournament, and you carefully map out your game (starting chips, color ups, re-buys), and you add some chips for flexibility for when you decide to increase starting stacks, etc., you need 1500-2500 chips. If you could get Paulsons you like, with the denoms you need, does that fit in your budget? A pretty good rule is 400-500 chips per table, but it varies based on several factors. I have 3 tournament sets where I could do 25 chips each for 40 players with plenty for re-buys and color ups, and all are in the 1600-1700 chip range.

If you are buying a cash set for 1 table, depending on the stakes and variations on that, the number of players, you might be looking at 300-1000 chips. I have a 700 chip cash set designed for 1 table, but it could be from $.01 small bets to up to $100 tops, but not designed as anything other than fairly small stakes -- total bank of $7,450. For cash chips, I think in terms of the total value of all the chips. I know of cash sets out there with twice the chips I have but half the bank.

If you are buying for both, measure your needs carefully.

What is your budget?
Be realistic. If you need 3000 chips, Paulsons that fit your needs are $3.50 each, you are looking at $10,500. If your budget is $2,000, that's not going to work, but that doesn't mean you can't get some Paulsons. You could get a small set and another set or two to meet other needs. Of course I'm making up these numbers, but figure this out. Only you know if your budget is a hard one or not. Reality is your friend here.

I have a heads up set of Paulsons -- 100 of them. They are absolutely great chips! By far the nicest chips I have. And when I say by far, I mean really far. But would I buy Paulsons (those were a gift)? No because for the stakes I play for, I can't justify it. I'd rather have sets where I can get the number of chips I want and not feel bad about what I spent on them.

People get interim sets for multiple reasons.

[1] Avoid this second most expensive mistake! -- They didn't carefully measure their needs and made a bad purchase. This will always feel like a total waste later. I have a somewhat expensive (at least to me) set like this, and some lesser expensive ones. I managed to sell some sets, but I lost money on them. It's worth playing around with spreadsheets to determine your needs and not thinking your game will never change.

Example: You start with 25/50 SB/BB and 10,000 to start. Then the WSOP goes from 10,000 to 30,000 and everyone (OK, actually just you, but it seems like everyone) wants something similar. Or you decide re-buys are now important but you didn't plan on that. Or you decide you need to do a special, year end event with larger starting stacks, but the set can't accommodate it. Or you discover that other games in your area offer players a better deal, so you need more chips to compete. The reality is that the poker world changes and you likely will too.

[2] They can't afford what they really want, but they need something quickly. They start building their chip war chest to get what they really want. Most of us don't want to stop playing until we can afford what we really want. That's not realistic if you rely on winnings to provide your chip budget. BTW, if you do that, you need to be realistic about what you are really capable of. They higher the stakes, the more difficult it is to win, so your win rate won't be as high. In other words, don't count on doubling the size game and thus double your profit so you can have the money for more stuff.

[3] They get a set they think they will be happy with and something changes. This is pretty common. I started off with a 7 color, 1000 chip set. It served me for 20 years, but was mostly used for cash. When I started playing tournaments, I realized I didn't really have enough of any of the colors to adequately handle a single table tournament without some quirky values that added confusion since they were undenominated. So I bought a single-table tournament set. I was very happy with it, but discovered two inadequacies. It completely was outdated when my game grew to 2 tables, and I realized denominated chips were a lot better! From there, I purchased some super diamonds with denoms. I hated the plainness, but it was a functional set. Though designed for 30, I discovered I really didn't have enough chips for 30. Rather than buy more, I went with China clays and a 40-player set. My game grew to 3 tables, and honestly in my current home, it's never going to be more than that unless I add a 4th out on the covered patio. Thus a 40-player set seems to fit my long-term needs. I now have 3 tournament sets that fit that bill. One of them I likely won't use and would be happy to sell. Though it has a ton of chips, it's better designed as a 2 table set. I had to re-do 2 denoms because they were hard to distinguish. That fixed problems with 2 chips, but created problems with another chip, naturally the biggest workhorse chips. It became a [1] problem for me.

[4] They need different sets for different games and get more sets.

[5] They buy with the idea they will add on later if they need more, but when the time comes, they discover those chips are no longer available and they can't add on.

[6] Variety is the spice of life. I personally alternate 2 tournament sets. I like both and use both. Then I have a third set for a secondary tournament if I ever have one. I'd probably enjoy a third set, but do I need it? No. If I alternated more than 3 when I currently host 14 times a year, to me that would be wasteful. If my chips were being used in another game I played in, which they were for a while, alternating makes sense. But alternating has its limits. I don't want sets to look at or simply be proud I own them. I want sets I use.

[7] Avoid this most expensive ... mistake? too! -- They get hooked on chips! They need lots of chip sets. Some they have never played with. The pope will be a baptist before they play with some of them, but they've got 'em! The only people who have found a cure for this problem are no longer on poker chip websites and can't give you advice. You have now been warned.

You likely are not buying your last chip purchase. Hopefully one of the good reasons above is why you buy more than one set.

Consider custom or semi-custom
If you buy a stock chip, there is at least some risk someone will bring in identical chips and you will acquire some additional chips the expensive way -- buy paying face value for them! Semi-customs to me are labeled or on a mold where they offer some variety. It's much harder to duplicate those chips. It's a lot of trouble and expensive, so probably not worth the effort. True customs you never have that worry.

I'd consider this. I like what I've seen in group buys and participated in 2 of them. But I did custom labels for both. I'm pretty concerned about this issue, but not enough to spend the money on true customs because of the stakes I play for.

Samples are a good idea, though I wasn't able to get samples of the sets I like and use the most before purchase.
 
[7] Avoid this most expensive ... mistake? too! -- They get hooked on chips! They need lots of chip sets. Some they have never played with. The pope will be a baptist before they play with some of them, but they've got 'em! The only people who have found a cure for this problem are no longer on poker chip websites and can't give you advice. You have now been warned.
Ha!
 
I was always taughtthat there are no dumb questions. I know however this is incorrect . Please tell me the difference between a cash sale and a tourney set.I have play tournaments but never cashed. I always tried to make a move usually right before people cashed. Why is it a large cash set doesn't do both.and yes I've always been afraid that people will steal my nice chips that's why I hate having one dollar chips.I even use CPC chips with no lable as one dollar chips or old chips I don't like much and just tell everybody at the table they're worth a dollar. Oh the sacrilege! My friends like to play one and two dollar blinds and Pot limit. I've had to add to my stacks to a total of about 1500 chips. They are all CPC with Horseheads too much trouble for anyone to counterfeit one and five dollars chips. I keep the larger is nominations on hand just in case but locked in a box
 
I was always taughtthat there are no dumb questions. I know however this is incorrect . Please tell me the difference between a cash sale and a tourney set.I have play tournaments but never cashed. I always tried to make a move usually right before people cashed. Why is it a large cash set doesn't do both.and yes I've always been afraid that people will steal my nice chips that's why I hate having one dollar chips.I even use CPC chips with no lable as one dollar chips or old chips I don't like much and just tell everybody at the table they're worth a dollar. Oh the sacrilege! My friends like to play one and two dollar blinds and Pot limit. I've had to add to my stacks to a total of about 1500 chips. They are all CPC with Horseheads too much trouble for anyone to counterfeit one and five dollars chips. I keep the larger is nominations on hand just in case but locked in a box
Should say cash set vs tourney set
 
You can also use a Magic Eraser to clean chips by hand

Just a word of caution on this, I just cleaned ~32 chips this way on Thursday, and I didn't wear gloves.......my left hand has 3-4 "rug burn" type sores in spots where the Magic Eraser was rubbing my skin. The micro-abrasions caused by the melamine foam actually started to bleed after about 25 chips... :(

So WEAR GLOVES when using MEs is all I can say.....this image is from today, 5 days since the damage:
IMG_1736.JPG
 
Please tell me the difference between a cash set and a tourney set.

Look at the first post of the Iron Bank Group Buy here:
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/official-iron-bank-ceramics-group-buy-order-thread.18940/

Cash sets are small denominations usually $0.05 through $500/$1000 chips and used for cash games
Tourney sets can have values anywhere from T1 through T1,000,000 (yes Million) and don't have $'s on the denominations. and they are used for Tournaments where the value of the chips does not directly indicate the monetary value.

You can use "cash chips" like from the Horseshoe casinos as "Tournament" chips in that there are values ranging from $1-$25,000 and people make fractional like $0.25 or $0.50, usually out of the Snappers ($2.50 casino chips).

But look at that post above and see the sets broken down into 39mm Cash, 43mm Cash and 39mm Tourney and 43mm Tourney sets and look at the labels.

Hope this helps!
nitzilla
 
Look at the first post of the Iron Bank Group Buy here:
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/official-iron-bank-ceramics-group-buy-order-thread.18940/

Cash sets are small denominations usually $0.05 through $500/$1000 chips and used for cash games
Tourney sets can have values anywhere from T1 through T1,000,000 (yes Million) and don't have $'s on the denominations. and they are used for Tournaments where the value of the chips does not directly indicate the monetary value.

You can use "cash chips" like from the Horseshoe casinos as "Tournament" chips in that there are values ranging from $1-$25,000 and people make fractional like $0.25 or $0.50, usually out of the Snappers ($2.50 casino chips).

But look at that post above and see the sets broken down into 39mm Cash, 43mm Cash and 39mm Tourney and 43mm Tourney sets and look at the labels.

Hope this helps!
nitzilla
It does help. There is a lot of information on this form it's just not always easy to find for me anyway
 
Haven't been to a casino in years are they using 43 mm chips these days
 
Haven't been to a casino in years are they using 43 mm chips these days
Only for larger denominations.

As a guy who seems concerned about chip security, you should realize the problem with using your cash chips for a tournament is that you'd be handing out thousands of dollars worth of cash chips for a cheap tournament buy-in. If a few of those cash chips disappear during the tournament and reappear at a cash game, you're screwed.
 
Now I get it...I have never hosted a tournament. Yes I care a lot about security. Some of my games got a kinda pricey. I als got hustled once for a couple grand...don't ask how...

I really enjoyed learning this stuff
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi PCF,

I recently developed my interest in chips, although I've been playing poker for years.
I was always told that Paulson chips are great, but do you guys think a new chipper like me, who have only owned "Dice chip" before, should buy a set of Paulson?
Welcome!! I am likely not the best source of advice because my answer is a resounding....YES!!!

Fyi, there are other chips brands that will make you equally as happy. One of my favorites is BCC Samurai Palace. Only come up occasionally, but the prices are usually a steal. I like my Samurais more than most of my Paulson's and some of my TR Kings.

Also stamped, solid color, T.R Kings go for cheap IMO. A beautiful set with unusual colors recently went for $1 per chip.

My point is don't be afraid to venture out beyond Paulsons because there are other chips that will quench your poker chip thirst:D

BUT again, I may not be the best source for advice because my poker chip thirst seems insatiable at times:ROFL: :ROFLMAO::whistle: :whistling: Just be sure you have fun along the way(y) :thumbsup:

Good luck!!

FB_IMG_1476018406815.jpg
 
Please tell me the difference between a cash sale [set] and a tourney set. ... Why is it a large cash set doesn't do both.

Fuzzy, I’m a fan of completely different chips for tournament and cash chips for several reasons. A big one is that tournament chips use fantasy values. The chips do not maintain their value throughout a tournament. Cash chips are using chips instead of cash. Those chips maintain their value throughout a game.

In a tournament, you might pay $20 and get 100,000 in chips. There is no correlation between the buy-in and the amount in chips. In a cash set, there is a direct correlation.

The big issue is chip migration. Chip migration occurs when a tournament chip migrates to a cash game and there is no money in the cash kitty to cover that chip. That’s bad for the host, the banker, and/or the last people to cash out since the money in the kitty disappeared when others cashed out.

There are two kinds of chip migration -- accidental and deliberate. Deliberate is cheating. Both can have the same results, it's just a matter of intent.

Suppose your players are trustworthy and would never deliberately migrate chips. That doesn’t fix the problem. Here’s what I saw happen where a cash game followed a tournament game, using the same set of chips.

Table gets bumped early in tournament (using 25/50/100/500/1000/5000/10,000 chips), and player raking large pot has chips all over the floor. Others help pick up chips.

Later, the cash game started at that table. Values of chips were the same except in pennies instead of points. Once again, player sitting in close to the same position has some chips dumped on floor. He picks them up (I wasn’t in it so don’t know if others helped). At the end of the night, there is $10 more in chips than there is in cash.

It isn’t hard to imagine what happened. The tournament player never noticed one of the 1000 chips on the floor, and neither did anyone else. When chips were dumped in the cash game, that 1000 chip got picked up without the player ever realizing he had picked up an extra $10 chip.

This involves no cheating, no deliberate chip migration, and no nefarious acts, but the pot is still $10 short. It’s an honest mistake, but who pays? Some players had already cashed out and gone home. Maybe one of them has $10 they didn’t actually earn. But how can you ask them to pay for something that wasn’t even discovered until after they left? And what if that had been a $50 or $100 chip? It’s the same problem, the consequences are just bigger.

It's not hard to imagine T25 (T = tournament) as the lowest tournament chip, but being used for $25 in a cash game. That T25 is of little real value, providing just a small fraction of the starting chip stack (1-5%). When it is colored up, it has no more value in a tournament. So it moves to the cash game as the $25 chip. Similar scenario as above, but now the pot is $25 short. Some people will even do something like this. Make $ value different that T value. The T25 becomes the $100 chip. Now the pot is $100 short.

Now, suppose you are the banker, responsible for taking in cash and issuing the chips, and you are the one who has to pay for this. Really in a cash game, this is what SHOULD happen. But who in their right mind would be willing to be the banker with those rules that require the banker to pay for bank mistakes and accidental chip migration is a possibility because the chips are the same? No one in their right mind!

Or, what if there is such a banker, and he realizes that this has happened, he suddenly decides to go home and leave the banking to someone else. Even if you take away the first banker’s deliberate act, suppose he just goes home without noticing? I bet when that happens rarely are all chips turned in so the mistake is caught before changing bankers. The banker with no control winds up paying.

The only way the same set of chips should be used would be if you did something like this. Cash chips are $.05/$.25/$1/$5/$20 or $25. Tournament chips are 25 (if not being used in cash game) - 100 - 500 - 1000 - 5000 - 25,000 - 100,000. That makes sense, but it is actually two different chip sets! They just have the same mold and labels/inlays. For a lot of players, a cash set that only goes to $20 or $25 and a tournament set that starts at T25 or T100 works just fine. But you don't have the same chips being used for both cash and tournaments.
 
Seeking Alpha, that is an impressive collection of chips! May I ask how many sets and how many chips?
 
Fuzzy, I’m a fan of completely different chips for tournament and cash chips for several reasons. A big one is that tournament chips use fantasy values. The chips do not maintain their value throughout a tournament. Cash chips are using chips instead of cash. Those chips maintain their value throughout a game.

In a tournament, you might pay $20 and get 100,000 in chips. There is no correlation between the buy-in and the amount in chips. In a cash set, there is a direct correlation.

The big issue is chip migration. Chip migration occurs when a tournament chip migrates to a cash game and there is no money in the cash kitty to cover that chip. That’s bad for the host, the banker, and/or the last people to cash out since the money in the kitty disappeared when others cashed out.

There are two kinds of chip migration -- accidental and deliberate. Deliberate is cheating. Both can have the same results, it's just a matter of intent.

Suppose your players are trustworthy and would never deliberately migrate chips. That doesn’t fix the problem. Here’s what I saw happen where a cash game followed a tournament game, using the same set of chips.

Table gets bumped early in tournament (using 25/50/100/500/1000/5000/10,000 chips), and player raking large pot has chips all over the floor. Others help pick up chips.

Later, the cash game started at that table. Values of chips were the same except in pennies instead of points. Once again, player sitting in close to the same position has some chips dumped on floor. He picks them up (I wasn’t in it so don’t know if others helped). At the end of the night, there is $10 more in chips than there is in cash.

It isn’t hard to imagine what happened. The tournament player never noticed one of the 1000 chips on the floor, and neither did anyone else. When chips were dumped in the cash game, that 1000 chip got picked up without the player ever realizing he had picked up an extra $10 chip.

This involves no cheating, no deliberate chip migration, and no nefarious acts, but the pot is still $10 short. It’s an honest mistake, but who pays? Some players had already cashed out and gone home. Maybe one of them has $10 they didn’t actually earn. But how can you ask them to pay for something that wasn’t even discovered until after they left? And what if that had been a $50 or $100 chip? It’s the same problem, the consequences are just bigger.

It's not hard to imagine T25 (T = tournament) as the lowest tournament chip, but being used for $25 in a cash game. That T25 is of little real value, providing just a small fraction of the starting chip stack (1-5%). When it is colored up, it has no more value in a tournament. So it moves to the cash game as the $25 chip. Similar scenario as above, but now the pot is $25 short. Some people will even do something like this. Make $ value different that T value. The T25 becomes the $100 chip. Now the pot is $100 short.

Now, suppose you are the banker, responsible for taking in cash and issuing the chips, and you are the one who has to pay for this. Really in a cash game, this is what SHOULD happen. But who in their right mind would be willing to be the banker with those rules that require the banker to pay for bank mistakes and accidental chip migration is a possibility because the chips are the same? No one in their right mind!

Or, what if there is such a banker, and he realizes that this has happened, he suddenly decides to go home and leave the banking to someone else. Even if you take away the first banker’s deliberate act, suppose he just goes home without noticing? I bet when that happens rarely are all chips turned in so the mistake is caught before changing bankers. The banker with no control winds up paying.

The only way the same set of chips should be used would be if you did something like this. Cash chips are $.05/$.25/$1/$5/$20 or $25. Tournament chips are 25 (if not being used in cash game) - 100 - 500 - 1000 - 5000 - 25,000 - 100,000. That makes sense, but it is actually two different chip sets! They just have the same mold and labels/inlays. For a lot of players, a cash set that only goes to $20 or $25 and a tournament set that starts at T25 or T100 works just fine. But you don't have the same chips being used for both cash and tournaments.
Thank you. This stuff is important... Glad I don't play tournaments
 
Cash chips are using chips instead of cash. Those chips maintain their value throughout a game.

In a tournament, you might pay $20 and get 100,000 in chips. There is no correlation between the buy-in and the amount in chips. In a cash set, there is a direct correlation.

Side note, this is why cash chips are also called checks. In casinos, cash chips are called checks (which is pretty much all the playing chips in a casino except for roulettes and tourney chips.)

Why?

Because, just like a paper check with an amount written on it, they are redeemable for cash.

This is also why most "special" chips issued by a casino say "NCV" or "No Cash Value" on them - to make clear that they're not checks.
 
Fuzzy, it's a bigger problem if you play cash than if you play tournaments. Cash chips migrating to tournaments do not usually cause big issues, but tournament chips migrating to the cash game will cause a cash shortage.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom