Should rename the thread 'Mummel's 43mm Project Discussion'
Good to be excited mate . When the red icon goes off I was kinda hoping for an update from Josh or any further questions etc ... about the 43mm project. Just breaking balls a bit ;-)Im excited New chippies. Suprised more people arent into it like the previous Majestics.
You sure you want to use 25p and 50p at the same time? For cash games I think 25p-£1-£5-£20 is what you need. But if that what you want, I don't mind.I'm hoping to get a set of 500 for my first set of chips, was going for a set of Majestics until i saw this set - without doing to much re-labeling & if i can get a $50 label - this is the cash set i am aiming for.
i would use the denominations in pence as i'm in the UK, we don't play a big cash game and these are what we use for our 25/50 game when we play.
View attachment 240200
You sure you want to use 25p and 50p at the same time? For cash games I think 25p-£1-£5-£20 is what you need. But if that what you want, I don't mind.
Like this?I'm hoping to get a set of 500 for my first set of chips, was going for a set of Majestics until i saw this set - without doing to much re-labeling & if i can get a $50 label - this is the cash set i am aiming for.
i would use the denominations in pence as i'm in the UK, we don't play a big cash game and these are what we use for our 25/50 game when we play.
View attachment 240200
Yeah that’s how I would of liked them but to save time and money with relabelling I will use what I posted above if I can.. good work on labels thoughLike this?View attachment 240223
A link would be good.
This weekend the owner of the company that will be making the Royal chips was in Las Vegas for a convention.
I gave him the $25,000 Horseshoe chip and told him to get as close as possible to the actual colors. We will see what he can do.
He is a friendly guy. I took him to Crown & Anchor where we had several beers.
View attachment 240716
This weekend the owner of the company that will be making the Royal chips was in Las Vegas for a convention.
I gave him the $25,000 Horseshoe chip and told him to get as close as possible to the actual colors. We will see what he can do.
He is a friendly guy. I took him to Crown & Anchor where we had several beers.
View attachment 240716
Personally, of those colors, I'd go with a slightly more traditional approach:Settled on getting a T500-Base tourney set after much reading and seeing @BGinGA 's posts on the breakdown. Just seeing what people's opinions are about the $5000/$25000. The Horseshoe $25000 is my favorite chip of the set so i like it being more of a workhorse during the game at $5000. What do you think? Top or Bottom? I'll clearly be relabeling either way.
View attachment 240908
Level | Small Blind | Big Blind | Big Blind Ante |
1 | 500 | 1000 | |
2 | 1000 | 2000 | |
3 | 1500 | 3000 | |
Break | |||
4 | 1500 | 3000 | 500 |
5 | 2000 | 4000 | 500 |
6 | 3000 | 6000 | 1000 |
Break: Remove T500s | |||
7 | 4000 | 8000 | 1000 |
8 | 6000 | 12,000 | 2000 |
9 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 3000 |
Break: Remove T1000s | |||
10 | 15,000 | 30,000 | 5000 |
11 | 20,000 | 40,000 | 5000 |
12 | 30,000 | 60,000 | 10,000 |
Break | |||
13 | 40,000 | 80,000 | 10,000 |
14 | 60,000 | 120,000 | 20,000 |
15 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 30,000 |
Break: Remove T5000s | |||
16 | 150,000 | 300,000 | 50,000 |
17 | 200,000 | 400,000 | 50,000 |
18 | 300,000 | 600,000 | 100,000 |
Here's my proposed line-up. Working on a new Zombie inlay.
View attachment 240957
T500 Base
T200,000 Tournaments
Starting Stacks
8 x 500
6 x 1000
8 x 5000
6 x 25,000
Blind Structure (16 minute levels, 12 minute breaks).
Level Small Blind Big Blind Big Blind Ante 1 500 1000 2 1000 2000 3 1500 3000 Break 4 1500 3000 500 5 2000 4000 500 6 3000 6000 1000 Break: Remove T500s 7 4000 8000 1000 8 6000 12,000 2000 9 10,000 20,000 3000 Break: Remove T1000s 10 15,000 30,000 5000 11 20,000 40,000 5000 12 30,000 60,000 10,000 Break 13 40,000 80,000 10,000 14 60,000 120,000 20,000 15 100,000 200,000 30,000 Break: Remove T5000s 16 150,000 300,000 50,000 17 200,000 400,000 50,000 18 300,000 600,000 100,000
This will be my first set built around a BBA structure. Suggestions are welcome, especially from @BGinGA.
Anti-ante protesters will hate it, because, well, no antes are needed at all. Some tournament ante purists will hate it, because they aren't individual antes, while some will hate it because the antes aren't large enough (most supporters advocate a table ante equal to the size of the big blind, which represents 10 individual antes that are each 1/10 of the big blind amount -- because antes are historically 1/10th to 1/8th the size of the big blind). Other purists will question why table antes aren't being applied from the very start of the tournament, since there is no longer a valid reason to delay their introduction. Then there are the folks who just dislike mindless zombies, and anything associated with the walking dead. Not me, but just sayin'....Here's my proposed line-up. Working on a new Zombie inlay.
View attachment 240957
T500 Base
T200,000 Tournaments
Starting Stacks
8 x 500
6 x 1000
8 x 5000
6 x 25,000
Blind Structure (16 minute levels, 12 minute breaks).
Level Small Blind Big Blind Big Blind Ante 1 500 1000 2 1000 2000 3 1500 3000 Break 4 1500 3000 500 5 2000 4000 500 6 3000 6000 1000 Break: Remove T500s 7 4000 8000 1000 8 6000 12,000 2000 9 10,000 20,000 3000 Break: Remove T1000s 10 15,000 30,000 5000 11 20,000 40,000 5000 12 30,000 60,000 10,000 Break 13 40,000 80,000 10,000 14 60,000 120,000 20,000 15 100,000 200,000 30,000 Break: Remove T5000s 16 150,000 300,000 50,000 17 200,000 400,000 50,000 18 300,000 600,000 100,000
This will be my first set built around a BBA structure. Suggestions are welcome, especially from @BGinGA.
I'm also in the anti-ante camp, but with more and more of my players becoming comfortable enough to play in casinos, I felt I needed to run an ante event sooner or later. I've avoided it this long (10+ years) but ante inclusion does change some strategies. Best to first encounter an ante for $20 rather than for $100.Anti-ante protesters will hate it, because, well, no antes are needed at all. Some tournament ante purists will hate it, because they aren't individual antes, while some will hate it because the antes aren't large enough (most supporters advocate a table ante equal to the size of the big blind, which represents 10 individual antes that are each 1/10 of the big blind amount -- because antes are historically 1/10th to 1/8th the size of the big blind). Other purists will question why table antes aren't being applied from the very start of the tournament, since there is no longer a valid reason to delay their introduction. Then there are the folks who just dislike mindless zombies, and anything associated with the walking dead. Not me, but just sayin'....
Personally, I think that antes (if table antes are used) should be in play from L1. The only reason they aren't in individual-ante events is because of the extra denominations required, a hindrance that is not present when building a table ante format.
I also understand the reasoning of using a table ante that isn't as huge as 'normal'. For simplicity, I'd recommend just making the table ante value equal to the small blind amount, starting with L1. The necessary chips will always be in play, every hand starts with dead money, and the perceived benefits of antes are still there (although the math is different). It also helps minimuze the impact of charging every player a full big-blind's worth of antes when the table is less than full, without needing to alter the table ante amount based on table size.
Fwiw, I also advocate, that if used at all, the table ante be posted by the small blind player, and that it is posted after that player posts his/her small blind first.
Lastly, I think your blind structure itself is incredibly aggressive. Most ante tournaments use a softer progression, which allows antes to be used to promote action without escalating the structure into turbo mode. For example, in terms of tournament feel and overall duration: a 27% avg. increase event with antes is roughly equivalent to a 43% avg. increase event without antes, a 43% avg. increase event with antes is roughly equivalent to a 59% avg. increase event without antes, and a 59% avg. Increase event with antes is roughly equivalent to a 75% avg. increase event with no antes.
@Apache - Is the 100K pink chip going to be the same pink as the Majestic pink 25¢? I might take my chances with the new shade of red on the $5 unless they are going to try and intensify the pink for the 100K. Thanks,
View attachment 241468View attachment 241471