Can Everyone Be Included Now? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, CT did take a lot of money, and then returned a bunch of nothing. That somehow felt more egregious than being upset because someone with fewer posts got some nice chips.

If someone screws with members, I don't spare the vocabulary.

Well, CT was Tens business, just a different model.

I did not think anyone was using term Orange Wall to associate the two.
 
Intent or not, it is the name. If I made a website called the Chip Douches, and some one called it the 'Douche Den,' would I really be able to take offense at that?
....

But hey - in the end, they chose the name.

I would have preferred "Chip FuckWankTitFuckWankFucks" but it wouldn't fit on the screen.
 
Last edited:
Chip Wankers does have a nice ring to it......
 
Chip Wankers does have a nice ring to it......
The Pink Wall.....
IMG_2348.PNG
 
Can we please quit with the insults? Or maybe it’s ok for some but not others.

I felt it was perfectly acceptable for me to call him out for being an annoying troll after what he said. Even @upNdown would acknowledge that his choice of words was at the very least poor, and by many people’s standards trolling. The fact that he started a thread on the other site on the topic supports this.

So to answer your question, if someone posts something that suggests myself or my friends are “butt-raping” people, you can 100% expect me to reply with something insulting towards that person.
 
I felt it was perfectly acceptable for me to call him out for being an annoying troll after what he said. Even @upNdown would acknowledge that his choice of words was at the very least poor, and by many people’s standards trolling. The fact that he started a thread on the other site on the topic supports this.

So to answer your question, if someone posts something that suggests myself or my friends are “butt-raping” people, you can 100% expect me to reply with something insulting towards that person.

I just keep seeing this reference to trolls - not just you but other- and this term has no other meaning other than a derogatory insult. It’s detriment to any kind of mature discussion, and if your defense is “he said something bad first” then there can never be any discussion.
 
I just keep seeing this reference to trolls - not just you but other- and this term has no other meaning other than a derogatory insult. It’s detriment to any kind of mature discussion, and if your defense is “he said something bad first” then there can never be any discussion.

I disagree, the word does have meaning. It suggests that he posted for the main purpose of creating discord. It suggests that he primary motivation was not to provide useful information to the thread, but rather to stir up bad feeling.

So when I called him a troll, it was specifically because I felt his post was trolling the thread and served no purpose beyond inciting issues. My response was not made as a derogatory insult, and my choice of words was intentional.
 
I just keep seeing this reference to trolls - not just you but other- and this term has no other meaning other than a derogatory insult. It’s detriment to any kind of mature discussion, and if your defense is “he said something bad first” then there can never be any discussion.

Seriously?

Talking about anal rape in relation to chip prices is “just starting a discussion”?

Go sell crazy elsewhere. We’re all stocked up here.
 
I disagree, the word does have meaning. It suggests that he posted for the main purpose of creating discord. It suggests that he primary motivation was not to provide useful information to the thread, but rather to stir up bad feeling.

So when I called him a troll, it was specifically because I felt his post was trolling the thread and served no purpose beyond inciting issues. My response was not made as a derogatory insult, and my choice of words was intentional.

My point is that your posts in this regard are solely for the purpose of increasing this discord. They add nothing toward providing useful information for the thread and are only for stirring up bad feelings.
 
Seriously?

Talking about anal rape in relation to chip prices is “just starting a discussion”?

Go sell crazy elsewhere. We’re all stocked up here.

I don’t know where this “anal rape” stuff s coming from. I never saw anything about this.

Did I miss something in the original post that started this discussion?
 
Uhm. You brought it up. The very post you quoted from Bentax, includes the offensive post by UpNDown.

Pro tip... lay off the sauce.

The only person I see using that term is bentax, and I thought he was the one that started using it.

Nice mature response too, insinuating that I’m a drunk and therefore not worth listening to.
 
I felt it was perfectly acceptable for me to call him out for being an annoying troll after what he said. Even @upNdown would acknowledge that his choice of words was at the very least poor, and by many people’s standards trolling. The fact that he started a thread on the other site on the topic supports this.

So to answer your question, if someone posts something that suggests myself or my friends are “butt-raping” people, you can 100% expect me to reply with something insulting towards that person.
Yeah, for whatever it’s worth, I’m okay with that. It got me thinking about whether it might be true. And it seems like a fair response from somebody I had just called a blank blank-er. Yeah, it’s probably a personal attack that could be moderated, but I’d rather see less moderation and thicker skins (though I recognize that can be a slippery slope.)
 
Another star chip thread dregged down into the abyss. Locking it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom