Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, Poker Chip Forum may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!
One of the big points that Bart made was this:
One of Postle's signature moves was to bet guys off rivers when he knew they didn't have it (this is pretty effective when you can see their cards.) If that's somebody's style of play, there's going to be a bunch of times when they were wrong and they run into a hand and they lose a lot. And apparently there just aren't any hands, in the hundreds of hours of feeds, where this guy bet big on the river and was wrong.
What makes anybody think he has a ton to hide? By all accounts this guy was only a successful player for that 18 month (or whatever) stretch when he could see his opponents cards. I bet he’s really broke. And eff him.
I mean seriously, eff that guy. I can understand the cheating. I could never do it myself, but there’s a logical (albeit) evil thought process there that makes sense. But then when the guy got caught, and he turned around and sued everybody for defamation, that’s the part I can’t wrap my head around. I don’t even know what to call it - calling it hubris or balls doesn’t seem right, because it’s really more like insanity. Maybe it’s just straight up assholery. The fact that those ridiculous suits caused a big chunk of his debts - that’s what says to me that there’s still something right in the world.
The article says he had 80k of debt (to his mother) of legal fees for a divorce separate from the scandal. I've never gone thru a divorce but that $80k seems crazy high. That's probably a lie as well to cover up some scam he is running.