Ladys and Gentlemen, I present to you https://www.pokerchipforum.com/glossary/terms/rng.201
We will refer to this as the @Jimulacrum entry!
We will refer to this as the @Jimulacrum entry!
We have voluntary props that are a little like this.Oh sorry, it's just to mean random (officially stands for Random Number Generator). So for example, we could play a game where if a 10 Hearts shows up, everyone puts in $1 to the pot. Or swap hands with the person to the left. Or have the person to the left steal a card.
Mayhem.
I knew what RNG means.Ladys and Gentlemen, I present to you https://www.pokerchipforum.com/glossary/terms/rng.201
We will refer to this as the @Jimulacrum entry!
I’ve seen this played where you had a choice, if you were going to use it then you had to pay. But if you didn’t pay you couldn’t use it. Couple more ways to add strategy there. You could pay as a red herring for example, to distract from the strength of your hand even if you weren’t using it.We have voluntary props that are a little like this.
For example, if a 3 lands on the river, everyone in on props pays me 2. If it's a 7, we all pay the guy who claimed 7s. We have a few standing props of this sort.
Swapping complete hands would be a little much for me, but if it makes your players happy, go for it!
I mentioned only playing games on the cards in my comment.
I both love and hate derailment.Plus anything that @bergs or @k9dr think up after being drunk!
For example I was told "Derailment" was outlawed long ago at meet ups. Rob introduces that shit to us in Florida and the past 2 years everyone is playing it!
Also Dramaha zero or 49 might not be in the cards but they should... drawmaha 21 should only be played with experienced players because it is confusing and if only 1 or 2 know the rules... you will have to explain them again every single hand!
99% of the time no wilds in any games... but @DarkHelmet55 always allows a few orbits of "Follow the Queen" I grew up playing stud with wilds so I don't mind... but absolutely NOT in any type of Omaha variant games.
In my personal opinion... Scrotum8 should be outlawed... you think.Derailment can get expensive and tricky... Scrotum8 is the devil!!
Also no 3-5-7 or any other game where someone has to match the pot in perpetuity until there's a final winner.No guts
When playing dealer's choice, do you have any criteria what games the dealer is allowed to call?
I disagree that most of the games you listed are any more prone to the betting getting silly than Hold'em or Omaha. That's more a feature of NL/PL betting in general than any specific game.
However, I agree wholeheartedly about this:
Also no 3-5-7 or any other game where someone has to match the pot in perpetuity until there's a final winner.
These games have too much potential to make a huge mess that will leave basically everyone unhappy.
Sounds like you’re playing it right, or at least how I was taught. Must have been really bad luck. But did no one want to add on? Since you control your own action, it doesn’t have to be table stakes. I can see allowing adding only when it’s not your turn, but otherwise I’d think it’d be okay to put more money on the table to win some back from the pot if you run out.It aint exactly poker, but we killed a limit night by playing Acey-Deucey. For those unfamiliar everyone antes and gets two cards. Starting with a player, you can wager up to the pot that the next card on top of the deck is between your two cards, or pass to the next player. If you're right you win your wager, if you're wrong your wager goes in the pot.
Only problem is we got a string of very bad luck, and suddenly the pot was larger than anyone but my stack. I managed to win it, but if I had lost then things would've gotten weird as no one would have enough chips to match the pot. I felt bad because I essentially won just because I chose to buy in the deepest, assuming it didn't matter for mixed limit games.
I feel like we must've been playing wrong, because if everyone's chips ended up in the middle I would've had no idea how to handle it. Was seriously considering just refunding everyone's buy ins lol.
We had no rule against adding on as much as you want, just for a low stakes limit game no one wanted to drop $40+ to try to scoop the pot.Sounds like you’re playing it right, or at least how I was taught. Must have been really bad luck. But did no one want to add on? Since you control your own action, it doesn’t have to be table stakes. I can see allowing adding only when it’s not your turn, but otherwise I’d think it’d be okay to put more money on the table to win some back from the pot if you run out.
When another player in my group hosts, we play the double board games as well as guts and I have found that the double board games generate significantly larger pots, but it may just be our players. He also allows three card guts, which has been brutal on occasion.I disagree that most of the games you listed are any more prone to the betting getting silly than Hold'em or Omaha. That's more a feature of NL/PL betting in general than any specific game.
However, I agree wholeheartedly about this:
Also no 3-5-7 or any other game where someone has to match the pot in perpetuity until there's a final winner.
These games have too much potential to make a huge mess that will leave basically everyone unhappy.
Didn't he have to already have the chips on the table in order to lose them?The following games are banned from my place:
-Between the sheets
One night during my old Thursday night league (I was not the host that night), this game was called. It grew from the original $10-$12 pot, to over 2K. One member ended up over $1,200 in the hole.
Letting someone play with that much, on credit? That's a recipe for potentially losing a friend. And it really has nothing to do with what game is being played. Give a player this much credit and they could just as easily lose it all playing hold'em.It took him months to pay it back. I consider people that come to my place friends.
I want them to be comfortable with their potential losses. It’s one thing to lose a couple hundred, but I don’t want anyone losing a mortgage payment.
-GUTZ
I just don’t like it
-Any wild card games
Maybe once a year, I’ll host an “old skool poker night”. Dealer’s choice, game changes on every deal. Just like the games I played in college and right after (before the Hold’em Boom). On those nights, I lift the restrictions on GUTZ and wildcard games. Only BTS stays on the banned list.
I’ve also done “No Hold’em Night”, too. Those nights the tourney is PLO, and NLHE joins the other games on the banned list.
I have questions...
Didn't he have to already have the chips on the table in order to lose them?
Letting someone play with that much, on credit? That's a recipe for potentially losing a friend. And it really has nothing to do with what game is being played. Give a player this much credit and they could just as easily lose it all playing hold'em.
I was still playing in the weekly tournament for our league. The cash game started on another table, so I didn’t have all the details on what happened, and why they continued to let him play on credit. I just heard about it after it happened. Again, I was not the host, and it was not my game.I have questions...
Didn't he have to already have the chips on the table in order to lose them?
Letting someone play with that much, on credit? That's a recipe for potentially losing a friend. And it really has nothing to do with what game is being played. Give a player this much credit and they could just as easily lose it all playing hold'em.
Also no 3-5-7 or any other game where someone has to match the pot in perpetuity until there's a final winner.
Our Indian friend calls the game every.single.time.I would explain that 'Indian' poker is 'stereotyping' and rude, further more I would have no part of that kind of BS at my game!
How ever if he called 'Blind Man's Bluff' I'd have to allow it...
Because it's similar to what we consider poker, but not exactly. Honestly I'm not sure what the exact definition of poker is, but no poker game takes multiple deal of the cards to find out the winner of the pot (okay as I'm typing this, maybe Draw Jacks or better)I'm surprised at the amount of people that commented no to guts. It's an easy fast game. I don't get why it would be banned?
It's hard to say exactly where poker begins and a game like Guts or Acey-Deucey begins. They all fall under the umbrella of pot-based community betting games. But it's clear that the idea of poker is broader than a 52-card deck and that list of hand ranks we all know.Because it's similar to what we consider poker, but not exactly. Honestly I'm not sure what the exact definition of poker is, but no poker game takes multiple deal of the cards to find out the winner of the pot (okay as I'm typing this, maybe Draw Jacks or better)
I played in a dealers choice game (dealer button chose the game) but it was kind of like a spread limit game ($1-$5 bets), max 4 bets per round.
There was also some strategy that if people wanted a "cheaper" run out, they would just bet $1 instead of checking to limit the number of bets.
(Ex: A bets $5, B raises to $10, C and D raise $1 each to cap the betting to $12 and not allowing A and B to cap it to $20).
It wasn't a big game but it was probably the most fun I had playing poker if you just want to play some cards
I've played a version of spread limit where your raise isn't pegged to the last increment, so a player who wants to limit the action can raise just $1 to make it go $5, $10, $11, $12 (or whatever).In spread limit, doesn't the last raise still set the minimum? If you reverse the ordering it works though. A bets $1, B raises $1, C and D raise by $5 you get a capped $12 pot.