Sisu41
Pair
maybe I should reduce it to .50/1 because typical buy in is $20Buy-in for limit doesn’t matter. No max needed. Typical buy-in is 25 big bets though, but no need to cap it.
maybe I should reduce it to .50/1 because typical buy in is $20Buy-in for limit doesn’t matter. No max needed. Typical buy-in is 25 big bets though, but no need to cap it.
That’ll work fine with quarters. It will now be a 2-chip/4-chip structure, so you should be able to get away with less chips, say a rack of quarters for each player.I think I'm gonna do a .5/1 game with $20 buy in if I ever start limit
for a 5-haded game could I get away with 40 quarters and 10 1's for now until I get more?That’ll work fine with quarters. It will now be a 2-chip/4-chip structure, so you should be able to get away with less chips, say a rack of quarters for each player.
That seems pretty doable. Limit sets don't need to be all one chip, but it makes things simpler at the cost of greatly increasing the chip count.for a 5-haded game could I get away with 40 quarters and 10 1's for now until I get more?
so $20 works?General rule of thumb of a limit buy in is 25x the big bet. So if you play .25/.25 and buy in for $25, you can play a FL $25 buy in with .5/$1 small bet big bet. Limit buy ins last longer though, so a closer equivalent would be more like double the buy in.
$20 initial buy in, but how many re buys on average? For .25/.25 I would ask my players to bring 3 buy ins for the night, $60 total, so the game doesn't break up early. If I was introducing these same players to fixed limit, and they all brought the same $60, a small bet of .75 and big bet of 1.5 would be reasonable IMO.maybe I should reduce it to .50/1 because typical buy in is $20
Bring this to Cali meetup in April. Love you muah thanks byeeeeeeeeeee!Please explain? Limit is a totally different beast, many here use limit sets to teach mixed games as pot limit can be extremely dangerous on split Omaha games.
Curious what is meant by simpler? I am personally not a huge fan of limit poker... if you don't play the proper stakes it can play extremely slow and boring (for the record many here are still limit fans so I don't speak for all)
As to "should I buy another set?" The answer is always YES moar chips is always better... but make sure you pick the right stakes or maybe consider a NCV set so the values of the chops can change as the game grows.
I was lucky enough to put this one together a few years back
View attachment 1242996
View attachment 1242997
And still haven't even started relabeling the Black's as $20s... tells you how often I need a limit set! But still recommend buying one if you have the itch for MOAR chips!
Yep. My games play that way. Moving money around the table.I would probably stay out at 2/4, with blinds at 1/2. It is going to play a lot smaller than what you think. If it plays too small you will be playing seven to eight players every hand, through the turn or river
This was said earlier but I wanted to second or third in agreement….Also, have a set? Well then you're already on the way to a limit set. Just buy more $1s, $2s, fracs, whatever your workhorse is
@allforcharity
Soorry. What are you toking aboot - foreign language where you came from! My toque must be too tight cuz it sounds like he should just buy more chips no matter what, eh! No way he’s going to afford a Kraft dinner and a two-four if he spends all his loonies and toonies on poker chips! Oh yeah fur sure, eh. No brewskies No way!!
YesI have good NL sets but I'm considering doing limit games because it's simpler. Should I get a new set specifically for limit games?
Bets are fixed: see fixed limit.What makes a set a limit set
I had the pleasure of living in Alberta and Ontario for 6 years. Absolutely lovely place to live and raise a family. While there, I picked up on a lot of the “foreign language”, and I even found myself apologizing for things I didn’t even do or cause. There were a lot of very nice people in those Provinces. It was all fantastic and I miss it.I think everyone I have played with locally would think putting limits on betting would be equivalent to the Apocalypse.