Empress Star and Aurora Star Poker Chips (3 Viewers)

25: ? 2V2W ?, ?, Carrot
100: Charcoal 4V418 Arc Yellow, Hot Pink
500: Hawaiian Flower/White (beta version) 8V ?, ?
1,000: Safety Orange 6D18 Light Blue, ?
5,000: Canary Yellow 4W Black, Day Green/Orchid (beta version)
25,000: Spot is 4TSA18, no idea about the colours.
 
pcr-es-original.png

Are the colours exactly as originally intended, particulary the 500 and 5000 (white body on 500, orchid center spot on 5000)?
 
View attachment 205623
Are the colours exactly as originally intended, particulary the 500 and 5000 (white body on 500, orchid center spot on 5000)?
The revised T5000, with the day green spot, is absolutely superior to the original. The original T500, in white, would have been absolutely superior to the compromise, Hawaii Flower, as produced.
 
Since people are making Paulson tribute (hybrid) sets and what not, is there any way we can get the Paulson (and every other vendor) put back into the chip design tool?
 
Between the Empress Star chips and the Aurora Star chips, which ones are more valuable / desirable?

I know it's based on what people prefer, but between the two, historically, which has shown to be more popular and/or desirable?

Which one has gone for the higher sales price? Which one seems to be harder to acquire?
Sorry for all the questions.

Thanks for any input any of you may have (y) :thumbsup:
 
Counts as best as I've gathered from PMs and posts. I've no idea about the tourney sets other than that the ES Secondaries are very limited.

Empress Star Cash
6500 x 25c
11100 x $1
10400 x $5
3400 x $20
3500 x $25
2500 x $100
1400 x $500
Total: 38,800

Aurora Star Cash
12500 x 25c
36000 x $1
10700 x $2
11900 x $2.50
29100 x $5
14100 x $20
10000 x $25
10700 x $100
Total: 135000
 
Last edited:
Between the Empress Star chips and the Aurora Star chips, which ones are more valuable / desirable?

I know it's based on what people prefer, but between the two, historically, which has shown to be more popular and/or desirable?

Which one has gone for the higher sales price? Which one seems to be harder to acquire?
Demand relative to supply is higher for all three ES sets, simply due to less supply. Market prices and availability tend to reflect that.

There were roughly 95,000 ES chips produced across three sets (39k cash, 26k tourney v1, 25k tourney v2), and roughly 205,000 AS chips produced across two sets (135k cash, 70k tourney). So by sheer numbers alone, that makes the three ES sets much harder to acquire, and the AS cash set the easiest by far.

More demand/less supply generally equates to higher prices, although some AS cash chips are 43mm which command a higher price (again, due to the supply/demand for Paulson 43mm IHC chips in general).


Most popular/desirable? Dunno, probably have to take a comprehensive poll across all five sets to get a definitive answer. But I'd guess ES tourney v1 would probably be #1. YMMV.
 
Counts as best as I've gathered from PMs and posts. I've no idea about the tourney sets other than that the ES Secondaries are very limited.

Empress Star Cash
6500 x 25c
11100 x $1
10400 x $5
3400 x $20
3500 x $25
2500 x $100
1400 x $500
Total: 38,800

Aurora Star Cash
12500 x 25c
36000 x $1
10700 x $2
11900 x $2.50
29100 x $5
14100 x $20
10000 x $25
10700 x $100
Total: 135000


Well that certainly gives me a good idea of their values, Thanks (y) :thumbsup:
 
Demand relative to supply is higher for all three ES sets, simply due to less supply. Market prices and availability tend to reflect that.

There were roughly 95,000 ES chips produced across three sets (39k cash, 26k tourney v1, 25k tourney v2), and roughly 205,000 AS chips produced across two sets (135k cash, 70k tourney). So by sheer numbers alone, that makes the three ES sets much harder to acquire, and the AS cash set the easiest by far.

More demand/less supply generally equates to higher prices, although some AS cash chips are 43mm which command a higher price (again, due to the supply/demand for Paulson 43mm IHC chips in general).


Most popular/desirable? Dunno, probably have to take a comprehensive poll across all five sets to get a definitive answer. But I'd guess ES tourney v1 would probably be #1. YMMV.

Thanks @BGinGA ! Your breakdown along with the other responses answered my question. (y) :thumbsup:
 
Since people are making Paulson tribute (hybrid) sets and what not, is there any way we can get the Paulson (and every other vendor) put back into the chip design tool?

What was the reason behind removing them from the chip design tool?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom