• This site contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, Poker Chip Forum may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

Hustler Casino Live (5 Viewers)

CrazyEddie said:
The facts which people are tossing around and calling "circumstantial evidence" don't rule out anything; accordingly, they can be used to generate theories but not to draw conclusions.
Click to expand...
Circumstantial evidence doesn’t need to rule out anything. It just needs to make one scenario more likely than the other scenario. Plenty of convictions have been based on that type of circumstantial evidence.

Also, since apparently everyone is trying Robbi in the court of public opinion, I don’t think the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is applicable. People are just trying to decide if they think she cheated or not.
 
Darson said:
Your hypothesis is only valid is this is a systematic pattern of cheating over multiple games for the tiny odds in her favour to play out as profitable. Really? Otherwise it's just a coin flip.
Click to expand...
Getting 47% equity with 40% of the money is a lot better than a coin flip. If she was cheating and someone knew the actual equities then absolutely it would have been profitable for her to call the all-in, regardless of what she might do in other hands, on other streets, or in other spots.

I don't think she was cheating, but "this was a bad call, she only had 47%" is a bad argument to show she wasn't cheating.
 
Direct evidence of Robbi and Bryan's cheating tech...

1665158823020.png
 
CrazyEddie said:
Getting 47% equity with 40% of the money is a lot better than a coin flip. If she was cheating and someone knew the actual equities then absolutely it would have been profitable for her to call the all-in, regardless of what she might do in other hands, on other streets, or in other spots.

I don't think she was cheating, but "this was a bad call, she only had 47%" is a bad argument to show she wasn't cheating.
Click to expand...
So you're saying that if you knew Garret's cards you would have called that shove?
 
Darson said:
So you're saying that if you knew Garret's cards you would have called that shove?
Click to expand...
Yes. Anyone should. Do you know what pot odds are?

... although technically, the 47% equity calculation includes knowing not just Garrett's cards, but all the other players' folded cards as well. But the point is that anyone who sees that she has 47% equity and is facing a 40% call should make that call every day and twice on Sundays.
 
CrazyEddie said:
Yes. Anyone should. Do you know what pot odds are?

... although technically, the 47% equity calculation includes knowing not just Garrett's cards, but all the other players' folded cards as well. But the point is that anyone who sees that she has 47% equity and is facing a 40% call should make that call every day and twice on Sundays.
Click to expand...
Cheater!
 
justsomedude said:
Wait a second... she said on Ingram's show last night that she has no idea who this Bryan guy is and that they never met... but she has him programmed in her phone now?

Holy fuck, she's a pathological liar.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1578413968133005312
Click to expand...
It looks like an Instagram direct message that she accepted after she read it. As in she wasn't following him on there and vice versa before the message was sent. Very conceivable that his name only came up to indicate who the direct message was from.
 
JMC9389 said:
It looks like an Instagram direct message that she accepted after she read it. As in she wasn't following him on there and vice versa before the message was sent. Very conceivable that his name only came up to indicate who the direct message was from.
Click to expand...

OK. That makes more sense. I didn't see that.

Thank you for clarifying. I will edit my post now.
 
Eloe2000 said:
I lean on the side of “the play didn’t look like cheating” but all of this other stuff, every bit of it, feels wrong to me. Her posting this feels off. The alleged DM from this guy feels off.
Click to expand...

NO WAY MAAAAN! This is all super duper normal and just how people act in the real world.

It's very clearly just the case of a smalltown girl who got flustered and emotional and arrogant because of the cameras and lights and made a crazy call.

Or wait... maybe it was a soulread hero call on Garrett cause his tells are so obvious from years of footage review that she put in.

Either way... she just had a brain fart and won. Ya know? People can call with J-high. C'mon man! looolz girls win too sometimes!

Don't be so sexist.
 
justsomedude said:
NO WAY MAAAAN! This is all super duper normal and just how people act in the real world.

It's very clearly just the case of a smalltown girl who got flustered and emotional and arrogant because of the cameras and lights and made a crazy call.

Or wait... maybe it was a soulread hero call on Garrett cause his tells are so obvious from years of footage review that she put in.

Either way... she just had a brain fart and won. Ya know? People can call with J-high. C'mon man! looolz girls win too sometimes!

Don't be so sexist.
Click to expand...
I am SHOCKED how many people think this woman cheated without a signed and notarized admittance of guilt. She clearly said she didn't and now that story is collaborated by someone who stole 5 figures from her, how can you fight against this type of evidence???
 
Hey Robbi, you don't know me but I have three cats, one who recently went into diabetic remission.

I've had some absolute sucka dealahs fuck me on the river recently, and well, I still think you cheated and this circus act from your accomplice is just another cover so he's the only fall guy (who doesn't do any time and doesn't repay any money)
 
Eloe2000 said:
This whole thing is just so bonkers and feels off

View attachment 1001733View attachment 1001735View attachment 1001736View attachment 1001737
https://twitter.com/x/status/1578413736628350977
Click to expand...
Keep in mind, that guy was defending Hustler and messaged Joey Ingram saying he was disrespecting them for insinuating there could be cheating.

Now he's glad to leave a toxic work environment? There's only one person here that's kept their story straight. and that's Gman.
 
Bart Hansen is reporting on his stream that Bryan has been losing $3-$5K daily in L.A. games in the past month or so. Wasn’t beforehand per his source. Hansen says it sounds either like he’s a degen, or he might have been dumping chips/$$$ to others to avoid suspicious cashouts.

More salt grains
 
Taghkanic said:
Bart Hansen is reporting on his stream that Bryan has been losing $3-$5K daily in L.A. games in the past month or so. Wasn’t beforehand per his source. Hansen says it sounds either like he’s a degen, or he might have been dumping chips/$$$ to others to avoid suspicious cashouts.

More salt grains
Click to expand...
Hmm......

Sounds like someone that needs money.
 
timinater said:
Do police in the USA need the cooperation of the victim to press charges??. Precedent in Canada is that you don't need a victim to cooperate to proceed with charges. If a crime occurs and there is sufficient probable cause or evidence police/prosecutors can proceed without any input from a victim.
Click to expand...
That can depend on quite a few different things such as what kind of crime(s), who/what the victims are, the way the actual code/statute is written (they can and sometimes do vary greatly across the US), the District Attorney's office that is or would be handling the case, etc. LE doesn't always need a victim's cooperation to make an initial arrest but afterwards, a DA/DDA/DA's office may choose not to file the case or to drop all charges or amend the charges, etc...
 
Samuel said:
That can depend on quite a few different things such as what kind of crime(s), who/what the victims are, the way the actual code/statute is written (they can and sometimes do vary greatly across the US), the District Attorney's office that is or would be handling the case, etc. LE doesn't always need a victim's cooperation to make an initial arrest but afterwards, a DA/DDA/DA's office may choose not to file the case or to drop all charges or amend the charges, etc...
Click to expand...

Cliffs: it depends
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Register

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

Santa123
Hustler Casino Live brings back clay
Replies
6
Views
307
bananapeel
B
M
New Cards on Hustler Casino Live?
Replies
5
Views
593
RocAFella1
RocAFella1
Santa123
New Chips @ Hustler Casino Live
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
LeLe
LeLe
C
Hustler Casino Live Chips.
Replies
13
Views
1K
seyff45
seyff45
L
Hustler Casino new chips
Replies
8
Views
600
Santa123
Santa123
Back
Top Bottom