Hustler Casino Live (7 Viewers)

[Eriks]

The fact that you posted this hand as a comparison is pretty epic/cute.

Yeah, Patrick is not some dumb girl








J/k I really don’t think her being a woman is of any relevence to this whole trainwreck of a case

 

[JScott]

I guess now we have to be specific on which "cheating" we're talking about when we discuss Robbi hey?

 

[bergs]

No this is not where we have landed.


We have landed in a place where the cards and the action do not matter at all.
It’s about character assassination, insinuation, innuendo, credit reports, previous jobs, marital status, childbirth status, reputation of associates, and sporting event attendance. That’s what decides whether it’s a good call or not.

You do not want members of PCF on a jury, that’s what I’m sayin.

Now we are all the Mean Girls.

My mission here was fulfilled in 25 October 2022 2:43p local theater time.

 

[justsomedude]

Chadelstein. lol

https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comments/yd5jok

 

[justsomedude]

I don’t know all the details of this hand. But it sounds suspicious.

https://www.gambling.com/us/news/poker-fans-debate-825k-genius-call-by-patrik-antonius-3568300

Would've been better if he tabled the J,2 and said, "I have a pure bluff catcher... and I put you on an Ace."

 

[RainmanTrail]

Would've been better if he tabled the J,2 and said, "I have a pure bluff catcher... and I put you on an Ace."

Except Patrick actually had a bluff catcher. And there were no more cards left to come. Robbi on the other hand did not have a bluff catcher, and the river hadn't even come yet.

 

[BGinGA]

Except Patrick actually had a bluff catcher. And there were no more cards left to come. Robbi on the other hand did not have a bluff catcher, and the river hadn't even come yet.

Meh, old news. Just admit it, you ain't never gonna change your mind, whether or not there is any credible or concrete evidence beyond mere conjecture.

Somewhere, someplace, there has to be the worst poker call ever. Can you think of a better candidate for the person responsible for making such a call?

 

[justsomedude]

Except Patrick actually had a bluff catcher. And there were no more cards left to come. Robbi on the other hand did not have a bluff catcher, and the river hadn't even come yet.

It. Was. A. Joke.

 

[Anthony Martino]

It. Was. A. Joke.

No jokes in serious thread!!

 

[RainmanTrail]

Meh, old news. Just admit it, you ain't never gonna change your mind, whether or not there is any credible or concrete evidence beyond mere conjecture.

Somewhere, someplace, there has to be the worst poker call ever. Can you think of a better candidate for the person responsible for making such a call?

I agree that she seems like a good candidate for someone who might have made the worst call in poker history.

I might be wrong here. I am very much capable of changing my mind. On any topic. But I believe the evidence still strongly points to her having been tipped off about Garrett's hand.

 

[RainmanTrail]

It. Was. A. Joke.

Yes, I know YOU were joking. But others in this thread truly don't see much of a difference between Patrick's call and Robbi's call. Or with countless other calls they've seen over the years. In poker, we refer to them as "fish".

 

[Budha]

I might be wrong here. I am very much capable of changing my mind. On any topic.

….others in this thread truly don't see much of a difference between Patrick's call and Robbi's call. Or with countless other calls they've seen over the years. In poker, we refer to them as "fish".

 

[Meddler2]

I believe the evidence still strongly points to her having been tipped off about Garrett's hand.

Any "evidence" beyond speculation?

 

[Anthony Martino]

Any "evidence" beyond speculation?

Ever hear of "circumstantial" evidence? It's still evidence.........

 

[Perthmike]

I guess will we never know whether the cheating occured or not. And pcf J's very clearly divided in this issue. But I'd be interested to see what would happen if someone setup a poll to see whether people would be confident enough in their innocence to invite someone like Robbi and/or Rip to play in their home game.

Just the background info alone about the way she lies about where she plays and who she knows is enough to set off huge alarm bells

 

[RainmanTrail]

Any "evidence" beyond speculation?

This isn't a court of law. Nobody is asking whether or not we think she belongs in prison right now. They're asking if we think she cheated. If you can't see the mountains of evidence that has been tattooed all over this thread, then I can't help you, and neither can you.

 

[Meddler2]

Ever hear of "circumstantial" evidence? It's still evidence.........

Obviously, but the accuracy of a polygraph trumps circumstantial evidence.

 

[Meddler2]

This isn't a court of law. Nobody is asking whether or not we think she belongs in prison right now. They're asking if we think she cheated. If you can't see the mountains of evidence that has been tattooed all over this thread, then I can't help you, and neither can you.

There's an 80-90% chance she is being truthful about the poker hand. I'm 100% convinced she is incapable intentionally controlling her physiological responses to alter the results of a polygraph exam.

 

[SeanGecko]

Most of this thread now

 

[Anthony Martino]

Obviously, but the accuracy of a polygraph trumps circumstantial evidence.

Forgetting that polygraphs aren't reliable, let's also factor in:

SHE chose the tester (way out in Vegas rather than in her LA area close to home which is....odd) and she selected the questions

I have investigated myself and found I am guilty of no wrongdoing

 

[NotRealNameNoSir]

View attachment 1013728

Forgetting that polygraphs aren't reliable, let's also factor in:

SHE chose the tester (way out in Vegas rather than in her LA area close to home which is....odd) and she selected the questions

I have investigated myself and found I am guilty of no wrongdoing

Weren't we just saying this isnt a courtroom, and circumstantial evidence counts? Just because its not scientific evidence doesnt mean it should be wholly disregarded. Can't have it both ways.

 

[Anthony Martino]

Weren't we just saying this isnt a courtroom, and circumstantial evidence counts? Just because its not scientific evidence doesnt mean it should be wholly disregarded. Can't have it both ways.

Typically when you take a lie detector test YOU don't control the questions you're asked and the selection of the company that administers the test. Also, I love the internet

 

[eightyWon]

@Anthony Martino when someone replies to this thread :

 

[Perthmike]

@Anthony Martino you do seem to have turned this into a fetish. Is Robbi part Asian?

 

[Anthony Martino]

@Anthony Martino you do seem to have turned this into a fetish. Is Robbi part Asian?

She used to look good from that gameshow vlip, before all the plastic

 

[BGinGA]

@Anthony Martino you do seem to have turned this into a fetish. Is Robbi part Asian?

He's in the process of making triplets, the molds are backordered.

 

[raynmanas]

He's in the process of making triplets, the molds are backordered.

she's already a twin, he only needs one more.

 

[Marc Hedrick]

@Anthony Martino you do seem to have turned this into a fetish. Is Robbi part Asian?

She is part YouTube clickbait. And I think that's why @Anthony Martino is so interested, and I don't blame him for that. Although I enjoy the actual poker content much better, lol.

 

[Anthony Martino]

She is part YouTube clickbait. And I think that's why @Anthony Martino is so interested, and I don't blame him for that. Although I enjoy the actual poker content much better, lol.

Gotten more views on those vids than PLO

 

[JMC9389]

Gotten more views on those vids than PLO

You need swag to promote the channel. Suckah Dealah shirts and hats would sell like hot cakes.

You guys have it all wrong on Robbi, by the way. Has she been checked for Cuban ancestry yet?