boltonguy
Flush
UTG RFI to 3BB (standard), BN calls, Hero in BB calls with 44. I think this is standard.
Wonderful flop. Hero X planning to raise. UTG cbets 1/3 or 3BB. BN raises to 9BB.
Hero thinks that the raise is either a FD, OESD, combo draw, or 55 (3 combos left so not super likely). QQ would raise pre so not in BN range.
I have huge equity against the draws and have 1 out against 55.
I think with 55 out there I should probably just flat - cant put a multi-way hand in the solver tho.
Instead I decide that there are so many more draw combos that they are more likely so I raise to 3X.
UTG folds and BN jams. I guess you can see the equities in the playback ... but I did decide to call the jam and V had the NFD so I got it in good, and held.
As soon as he jammed I thought - NFD - and I was getting it in good calling.
Was the flop raise too spewy? How about calling the jam? It worked out OK but I dont want to be results oriented.
EDIT: put it in Snowie below and looks like the raise and call was OK
Wonderful flop. Hero X planning to raise. UTG cbets 1/3 or 3BB. BN raises to 9BB.
Hero thinks that the raise is either a FD, OESD, combo draw, or 55 (3 combos left so not super likely). QQ would raise pre so not in BN range.
I have huge equity against the draws and have 1 out against 55.
I think with 55 out there I should probably just flat - cant put a multi-way hand in the solver tho.
Instead I decide that there are so many more draw combos that they are more likely so I raise to 3X.
UTG folds and BN jams. I guess you can see the equities in the playback ... but I did decide to call the jam and V had the NFD so I got it in good, and held.
As soon as he jammed I thought - NFD - and I was getting it in good calling.
Was the flop raise too spewy? How about calling the jam? It worked out OK but I dont want to be results oriented.
EDIT: put it in Snowie below and looks like the raise and call was OK
Attachments
Last edited: