SOLD Indiana Grand Sale Thread (9 Viewers)

[lewan]

@WhiteMamba1646 you monster!

 

[joeyshin]

View attachment 919406View attachment 919407View attachment 919408View attachment 919409View attachment 919410

Besides the $1s, you bought all the wrong chips. Lol jk

 

[upNdown]

Besides the $1s, you bought all the wrong chips. Lol jk

I dunno, I felt a lot more strongly about the secondary $100s back when I though I was getting some.

 

[Ethan]

View attachment 919406View attachment 919407View attachment 919408View attachment 919409View attachment 919410

Holy dibs almighty

 

[cpac54]

I dunno, I felt a lot more strongly about the secondary $100s back when I though I was getting some.

the secondary $100s were my favourite initially, but seeing those primary $100s in stacks completely changed my mind.

Also, I still can't decide which $1 I like better. I love the secondary, but feel like the primary just works so well in the primary lineup.

 

[tmedic12]

Anybody figure out what is the best rack to hold these chips?

 

[joeyshin]

Anybody figure out what is the best rack to hold these chips?

Paulson racks for Paulson chips

 

[ktran]

Anybody figure out what is the best rack to hold these chips?

Second. I have Paulson racks for THC and need to modify to make them to fit.

 

[Gear]

Second. I have Paulson racks for THC and need to modify to make them to fit.

Not sure what you mean ... the racks are too big, because the chips are used/worn?

 

[Ethan]

Thread '[Subbed] Me after Chiproom sales'
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/subbed-me-after-chiproom-sales.55172/

 

[ktran]

Not sure what you mean ... the racks are too big, because the chips are used/worn?

RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have areade for THC.

 

[Gear]

RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have are made for THC.

Since when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.

 

[joeyshin]

RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have areade for THC.

I’ve never heard this before. Let me go check

 

[ktran]

Since when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.

I think there are different size racks. The ones I have are slightly too big for RHC. They fit 20 THC perfectly, but RHC are made thinner.

 

[joeyshin]

I’ve never heard this before. Let me go check

Since when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.

Nvm. If anyone would know it’s @Gear

 

[Gear]

RHC are made thinner.

No, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?

 

[davin]

No, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?

Pretty sure he’s trolling lol

 

[Gear]

Nvm. If anyone would know it’s @Gear

I appreciate that, but I'm not infallible. I'm just saying I've never heard of that. Doesn't mean it's not a thing.

 

[ktran]

No, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?

Someone said it in a comment somewhere and I actually tested it myself to see. It's the same with poker cases. Can fit an X amount of THC and X amount of RHC. Well at least the Paulson trays I have. They fit 20 THC perfectly.

 

[Josh Kifer]

I remember when people hated the word flipper, now everyone is so happy to do it. Lol, this place....

 

[toothpic]

Minty Paulsons (RHC or THC) are very snug in Paulson racks. Maybe you're comparing to worn chips vs new?

 

[Gear]

Someone said it in a comment somewhere and I actually tested it myself to see.

I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.

 

[allforcharity]

Oh good thanks guys
I wasn't sure since Ben is part of the house hold too

Kick him out. Buy another 2000 chips.

 

[Gear]

Kick him out so he can buy another 2000 chips.

FYP

Two households FTW!

 

[ktran]

I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.

Maybe I forgot exactly. I did have some 100s that were newish. Do you have a Paulson rack to try those Paradice 100s? @HebbNH

Sorry for the confusion if I started any.

 

[LeGold]

I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.

Interestingly, just checked, newest THCs (RPC) have problems fitting into Paulson racks here. While mint SY $2s do have a tiny little bit of slack.

 

[allforcharity]

FYP

To-may-to to-mah-to. It's a win-win.

 

[grantc54]

I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.

Strangely the mint unplayed spotted hot stamp Lady Luck tournament RHC chips actually stack shorter than other mint RHC. Strange.

 

[Gear]

newest THCs (RPC) have problems fitting into Paulson racks here.

But they do fit.

There still aren't different racks made for THC vs RHC.

EDIT: Paulson doesn't make different racks for THC vs RHC.

 

[ktran]

Strangely the mint unplayed spotted hot stamp Lady Luck tournament RHC chips actually stack shorter than other mint RHC. Strange.

This might be the case with Paradice, but I don't have them anymore to recheck.