@WhiteMamba1646 you monster!
I dunno, I felt a lot more strongly about the secondary $100s back when I though I was getting some.Besides the $1s, you bought all the wrong chips. Lol jk
the secondary $100s were my favourite initially, but seeing those primary $100s in stacks completely changed my mind.I dunno, I felt a lot more strongly about the secondary $100s back when I though I was getting some.
Paulson racks for Paulson chipsAnybody figure out what is the best rack to hold these chips?
Second. I have Paulson racks for THC and need to modify to make them to fit.Anybody figure out what is the best rack to hold these chips?
Not sure what you mean ... the racks are too big, because the chips are used/worn?Second. I have Paulson racks for THC and need to modify to make them to fit.
RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have areade for THC.Not sure what you mean ... the racks are too big, because the chips are used/worn?
Since when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have are made for THC.
RHC chips are thinner than THC. The racks I have areade for THC.
I think there are different size racks. The ones I have are slightly too big for RHC. They fit 20 THC perfectly, but RHC are made thinner.Since when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.
I’ve never heard this before. Let me go check
Nvm. If anyone would know it’s @GearSince when? I have never ever heard of a distinction being made for Paulson racks based on mold.
No, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?RHC are made thinner.
Pretty sure he’s trolling lolNo, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?
I appreciate that, but I'm not infallible. I'm just saying I've never heard of that. Doesn't mean it's not a thing.Nvm. If anyone would know it’s @Gear
Someone said it in a comment somewhere and I actually tested it myself to see. It's the same with poker cases. Can fit an X amount of THC and X amount of RHC. Well at least the Paulson trays I have. They fit 20 THC perfectly.No, they aren't. Where are you getting that idea?
I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.Someone said it in a comment somewhere and I actually tested it myself to see.
Oh good thanks guys
I wasn't sure since Ben is part of the house hold too
FYPKick him out so he can buy another 2000 chips.
Maybe I forgot exactly. I did have some 100s that were newish. Do you have a Paulson rack to try those Paradice 100s? @HebbNHI can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.
Interestingly, just checked, newest THCs (RPC) have problems fitting into Paulson racks here. While mint SY $2s do have a tiny little bit of slack.I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.
Strangely the mint unplayed spotted hot stamp Lady Luck tournament RHC chips actually stack shorter than other mint RHC. Strange.I can believe that some (SOME) very old TH&C chips end up stacking a little thicker, especially LCV with hotstamps, but anything recent is all the same thickness. Paulson is amazingly consistent on their thicknesses.
But they do fit.newest THCs (RPC) have problems fitting into Paulson racks here.
This might be the case with Paradice, but I don't have them anymore to recheck.Strangely the mint unplayed spotted hot stamp Lady Luck tournament RHC chips actually stack shorter than other mint RHC. Strange.