merkong
Full House
Why would I answer the door? Get fucked.
Why would I answer the door? Get fucked.
Dude that didn't even escalate quickly that just started at 100This vid was full send - Don’t watch if you’re soft serve. She isn’t gentle
I’d not do this, unless they brought that same energy.
That started at Mach 1. Love her moxie. But, I didn’t think the cop was ugly like she did. Just sayin.Dude that didn't even escalate quickly that just started at 100
The source of that anxiety might be the undeserved amount of attention that the topic receives compared to the actual risk.But people here are always worried about these law issues.
Yeah that’s a good point.The source of that anxiety might be the undeserved amount of attention that the topic receives compared to the actual risk.
The silent but vast majority of us are going about our days, probably tipping our hosts, definitely tipping our dealers, not getting raided at a lol 50¢ social game.
Absolutely not, but it allows the usual suspects to vent their hatr…tolerance, and tell their “this one time…” stories.Are home games in other states really this much of a worry?
I remember seeing this. IIRC, the neighbors and police had been harassing the woman. I don’t remember why. But the officer lied and the police didn’t actually have a warrant. Go figure.Holy crap! But apparently effective.....
Ask for a warrant, if it's not there, the conversation is shut down.***********************************************************************Ok kids, I’ve gone over this in my head countless times since the substantive conversation that ensued on the podcast and rest assured The Godfather Club has a protocol in place for just such an event. Additionally, if the house is detained, all players understand what they would be required to do if they’re somehow in a position to answer my door. They shouldn’t be answering my door and I’m never detained.
So, what say you?
True. This is also how I read Minnesota Law, but not everyone will so I do think @upNdown 's point is actually well taken. When I took gaming law in college, home poker was a topic of one of my papers, and I remember researching a suggestion was have anyone other than the host manage money for incidentals, just to have that extra deliniation. Not advice I have followed, I usually collect for orders and such.Raking a game is definitively different than asking for donations to cover food and beverage in MN.
There have certainly been more than a few detailed threads on this happening to PCFers. It may not happen often, but it's horrifying when it does.The source of that anxiety might be the undeserved amount of attention that the topic receives compared to the actual risk.
The silent but vast majority of us are going about our days, probably tipping our hosts, definitely tipping our dealers, not getting raided at a lol 50¢ social game.
There was a nasty thread about how much a PCFer in Virgina lost to a raid. There are a few states that crack down on this from time to time.Are home games in other states really this much of a worry?
This is why I would never invite them in without a warrant. Non poker related, I had a drug addict of a cousin. The police stopped by to talk to him and his sister answered the door. No parents home but the sister was 18. She invited them in to talk to him and they went thru the whole house opening cabinets and drawers. Didn’t need a warrant because they were invited in.Ask for a warrant, if it's not there, the conversation is shut down.
If you are honest and innocent, that's only half the equation in this interaction. Inviting the officer in is to invite a fishing expedition, and there is no way you should have that level of trust in a stranger, or anyone with the ability to do you harm.
Where do I find the podcast?
I’d argue they still need a warrant. Letting them in doesn’t imply consent to search. If it’s in plain view they can act on it but they sure as hell can’t go through cabinets and drawers without a warrant or express consent.This is why I would never invite them in without a warrant. Non poker related, I had a drug addict of a cousin. The police stopped by to talk to him and his sister answered the door. No parents home but the sister was 18. She invited them in to talk to him and they went thru the whole house opening cabinets and drawers. Didn’t need a warrant because they were invited in.
No doubt. That happened on All in the family. Archie got off.I’d argue they still need a warrant. Letting them in doesn’t imply consent to search. If it’s in plain view they can act on it but they sure as hell can’t go through cabinets and drawers without a warrant or express consent.
Sweet.This vid was full send - Don’t watch if you’re soft serve.
She isn’t gentle
I’d not do this, unless they brought that same energy.
You can argue theory all you want, but there certainly are cops that will have different opinions or just not care.I’d argue they still need a warrant. Letting them in doesn’t imply consent to search. If it’s in plain view they can act on it but they sure as hell can’t go through cabinets and drawers without a warrant or express consent.
Just lock eyes with them and don’t speak. They’ll figure it out…
I agree with you there. I’ve also made that same argument to judges before and have dismiss the case against my client because they had no evidence without the illegal search.You can argue theory all you want, but there certainly are cops that will have different opinions or just not care.
Correct….they didn’t find anything so we won’t know. But I’d argue if they did, they would have said it was in plain sight and get a warrant then. It would be up to you to argue it wasn’t.I’d argue they still need a warrant. Letting them in doesn’t imply consent to search. If it’s in plain view they can act on it but they sure as hell can’t go through cabinets and drawers without a warrant or express consent.
You can argue theory all you want, but there certainly are cops that will have different opinions or just not care.
The useful truth is that you’re both right.I agree with you there. I’ve also made that same argument to judges before and have dismiss the case against my client because they had no evidence without the illegal search.