Anthony Martino
Royal Flush
And we're off!
Respect for posting your poorly hand plays and oddball spews - usually people only post stuff that makes them look good. I’m sure your backers appreciate the honesty.
Not really -- you're ignoring the 13.61% Tie probability that the other two hands share. The only reason AKQT doesn't show 40.96 is that he's sharing the likelihood of a tie (AQ or AT) with AQT7, not with you.Somehow, my AJ98 was actually the equity favorite, which is pretty nuts. I thought the equities were closer with me as a slight dog when I saw the hands tabled.
View attachment 761362
Well, someone had to rain on his parade....Not really -- you're ignoring the 13.61% Tie probability that the other two hands share. The only reason AKQT doesn't show 40.96 is that he's sharing the likelihood of a tie (AQ or AT) with AQT7, not with you.
Not really -- you're ignoring the 13.61% Tie probability that the other two hands share. The only reason AKQT doesn't show 40.96 is that he's sharing the likelihood of a tie (AQ or AT) with AQT7, not with you.
The other guy scoops 27% of the time, and he and the other guy share your money 13% of the time. You still lose 40+% of the time.I'm not ignoring it. I'm still an equity favorite three ways when you factor in the amount of money that can be won. That guy only scoops 27% of the time and has to chop the pot the other 13%
The other guy scoops 27% of the time, and he and the other guy share your money 13% of the time. You still lose 40+% of the time.
You may call that being an equity favorite, but you're not considering the overall picture.
@Anthony Martino, has your definition of pro changed since turning to poker full time?
Is it even medically possible to fart that much?
The other guy scoops 27% of the time, and he and the other guy share your money 13% of the time. You still lose 40+% of the time.
You may call that being an equity favorite, but you're not considering the overall picture.
Just imagine winning flips with 8 players at the table 40% of the time … you would be (even more of) a lucky bastard!poker maff hurts my head.
If you're 40% to win a hand would it not matter if there were 3 , 4 or 8 players in the hand?
40% is 40% no? Which means you are losing more times than winning?
explain it like I'm 5 (buyins deep)