Two great teams with arguably the two best players meet in the finals... coincidence?
What's the size of the country got to do with it, sorry? Croatia have always produced world class talent, and have proven time and time again that they can mix it with the best teams in the world. It's not the size of the country — but the quality of the talent (and that can come from any-sized country).Thoughts on the bronze medal game?
Both are small countries who would (or at least should) cherish a bronze medal. But since Croatia got the silver last time I'm thinking that they are more gutted than the Moroccans. I think the latter want it more so my money's on them.
I disagree. I’m Scottish. I know what I’m talking aboutthat can come from any-sized country
I didn't mean size as in population or square km (1 km is about 4213 forearms for you uk folk or 2125 freedom eagles for those in the US), I meant as football nations. For example, Sweden both has a larger population than Croatia and its area is more square forearms, but I consider it a smaller football nation.What's the size of the country got to do with it, sorry? Croatia have always produced world class talent, and have proven time and time again that they can mix it with the best teams in the world. It's not the size of the country — but the quality of the talent (and that can come from any-sized country).
Croatia did come second in the last world cup, so definitely a good team thats for sure. But at this point Morocco have pretty much proven all previous stats worthless, lol, so its hard to say. The will of the Moroccans have gotten them this far, but I have a feeling their team is not healthy enough to win the last game. They had to sub out their whole back four (IIRC?) in the semi final, or at least several or their best players. The crazy running and dedication so far has taken its toll on the team, and I don't think they have that good of a bench as the other big teams. They might just be too tired to pull through. Hope im wrong though, as I would love to see them get that well deserved thrid place!I didn't mean size as in population or square km (1 km is about 4213 forearms for you uk folk or 2125 freedom eagles for those in the US), I meant as football nations. For example, Sweden both has a larger population than Croatia and its area is more square forearms, but I consider it a smaller football nation.
Point taken that Croatia has had great results, but I still think they are small enough to take the bronze medal game seriously and not just let their bench play as some of the larger (football) nations have done in the past.
I honestly don’t get the point of the third place game. They should just call it the “who gives a fuck” game. If I had lost a semifinal my brain would already be on the plane home. Seems a bit shite to make them go back out for a meaningless game.Croatia did come second in the last world cup, so definitely a good team thats for sure. But at this point Morocco have pretty much proven all previous stats worthless, lol, so its hard to say. The will of the Moroccans have gotten them this far, but I have a feeling their team is not healthy enough to win the last game. They had to sub out their whole back four (IIRC?) in the semi final, or at least several or their best players. The crazy running and dedication so far has taken its toll on the team, and I don't think they have that good of a bench as the other big teams. They might just be too tired to pull through. Hope im wrong though, as I would love to see them get that well deserved thrid place!
You can ask any Swede, Turk, or Croatian (pre 2018) whether or not the third place game is meaningless. I think most will disagree with you!I honestly don’t get the point of the third place game. They should just call it the “who gives a fuck” game. If I had lost a semifinal my brain would already be on the plane home. Seems a bit shite to make them go back out for a meaningless game.
Ah, the old size doesn't matter it's what you do with it arguementWhat's the size of the country got to do with it, sorry? Croatia have always produced world class talent, and have proven time and time again that they can mix it with the best teams in the world. It's not the size of the country — but the quality of the talent (and that can come from any-sized country).
That’s an interesting point of view. We’ve never got out the group stage so I can’t speak from personal experience. I couldn’t give a fuck about a bronze or even a silver medal. Nobody remembers the runners up.You can ask any Swede, Turk, or Croatian (pre 2018) whether or not the third place game is meaningless. I think most will disagree with you!
I even think the Belgiums where happy with Bronze if I remember correctly, even though they were among the favorites that year.
I get that some larger (football) nations find it pointless. But if you ask me, checking out mentally before the game (as a lot have done in the past) is arrogant and entitled. Ffs, you have a chance at a medal for yourself and, more importantly, your country! Give it your all!!
(Unless it's the ice hockey world championships! Who gives a fuck about that bronze?? Skip it!!)
This could be that being a Celtic fan we expect to finish first and finishing second is seen as failure and will get a manager sacked. There’s a “winning is everything” attitude.entitled
It's interesting to hear this perspective. I know a lot of people share your view.That’s an interesting point of view. We’ve never got out the group stage so I can’t speak from personal experience. I couldn’t give a fuck about a bronze or even a silver medal. Nobody remembers the runners up.
If I had to play that game I would give the reserves a run out. Would rather not play it at all though.
Sorry, didn't mean to offend.This could be that being a Celtic fan we expect to finish first and finishing second is seen as failure and will get a manager sacked. There’s a “winning is everything” attitude.
Probably find fans of clubs that experience a lot of domestic success have a similar attitude. So you could be right about being entitled.
Nah. I don’t care about any other sports. Never watch the Olympics. Honestly I would turn it over and watch something elseif someone from Scotland took an upset Olympic bronze in e.g. the 100m dash, you would probably be happy and proud
I would have collapsed and died at the quarterfinal stageif Scotland took the World Cup bronze
Not offended at all mate. Was just saying that you might be right. If you support a team that wins all the time perhaps you don’t appreciate the others in the competition. I mean if you’re in Scotland only two teams have a chance of winning the league yet thousands go and see their teams that the know won’t win anything. Got to admire those fans.didn't mean to offend
I saw the Croatian winning goal this morning and the fans were delighted about it. It means something to them.Interesting scenes after the final whistle. The Croatian players and fans were happy (?), the Moroccan players surrounded the referee to complain, the Maroccan fans were disappointed....all after a completely meaningless game?
...why didn't your start watching world cups until your 30's?I saw the Croatian winning goal this morning and the fans were delighted about it. It means something to them.
Personally I would scrap the third place game. I don’t see the point of it. I don’t think I’ve ever watched a third place game. I certainly couldn’t tell you who’s won any of them since 1982 (when I started watching World Cups).
The first game I went to…...why didn't your start watching world cups until your 30's?
How dare you? . 94 bronze celebration in Stockholm. 3rd or 4th fking matters!Personally I would scrap the third place game.
That’s pretty impressive. I do get celebrating your team reaching the semi final and I would go and cheer Scotland if that ever happened (it won’t) but I don’t see why we need to know who was third and who was fourth. Seems pointless to me.How dare you? . 94 bronze celebration in Stockholm. 3rd or 4th fking matters!
View attachment 1043037
How dare you? . 94 bronze celebration in Stockholm. 3rd or 4th fking matters!
View attachment 1043037
4th: no medal, lost its final two games of the world cup.That’s pretty impressive. I do get celebrating your team reaching the semi final and I would go and cheer Scotland if that ever happened (it won’t) but I don’t see why we need to know who was third and who was fourth. Seems pointless to me.
Henrik and semi. Enough saidView attachment 1043039
View attachment 1043040
...and, to give @BonScot the erection of his life:
View attachment 1043041
I don’t get it. Just cancel that pointless game and let the players go home. Imagine how you’d feel if a player got seriously injured playing in that nonsense.4th: no medal, lost its final two games of the world cup.
3rd: medal, won its final game
I'd be embarrassed to have to even play in a third place game. Podiums don't exist in football.That’s an interesting point of view. We’ve never got out the group stage so I can’t speak from personal experience. I couldn’t give a fuck about a bronze or even a silver medal. Nobody remembers the runners up.
If I had to play that game I would give the reserves a run out. Would rather not play it at all though.
We’re gonna have to agree to disagree on this oneI don’t get it. Just cancel that pointless game and let the players go home. Imagine how you’d feel if a player got seriously injured playing in that nonsense.