TeamNapoli
Straight
so the poker size cards are currently out of stock, correct? Can we put a reserve on a set?
-
This site contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, Poker Chip Forum may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!
Ordering Links (18 Viewers)
- Thread starter desjgn
- Start date
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
Not out of stock as far as I know, I just ordered 3 sets a couple weeks ago.
Just go to page one of this topic & use the links.
Classic Flourish (poker size, regular index)
Classic Victorian (poker size, jumbo index)
I pretty much exclusively use poker sized card in my Shuffletech as I have had mixed results with bridge sized cards. Last night I had a session from 7pm up until about 3am. Not a single jam that required manual attention, the shuffler worked itself each time if there was a small snag. I'd say most sessions go by smooth and I usually only host games from 3-5 hours so the sample size is a bit smaller then if your game is running for hours on end. With Bridge cards I had a slightly higher percentage of jams since the cards don't fill the slot as well as poker sized cards do. For me the Shuffletech has been a home run purchase thus far. It'll be sad when it needs maintenance lol. I also make sure to keep the rollers clean with alcohol wipes and I use an air duster to keep the innards clean.
Klobberer
Full House
Just got mine and they are nice. They are much rougher textured than all of my other setups. They take longer to shuffle because I use the "riffle the corner and push them together" method. Do they get smoother with age? They are great for magic tricks where you don't want the cards sliding around.
OP
OP
You are able to purchase any of the decks listed in the first post. If quantities are low for a specific card style, it is also noted.
Last edited:
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
OK, OK, stop twisting my arm, I give up!!! LOL
Seriously, thanks for that. I'm convinced... well... I was leaning that way anyway, so it didn't really take much to push me over the edge.
If I happen to not make the FT, I've always volunteered to deal the FT with either my wife or the TD sitting at a small table behind me as the "shuffler" of a second deck. Since I'm taking over as TD I'll always be dealing the FT now, & having one on a small cart kind of makes sense.
I hear you on the service deal... I've heard their customer service kind of blows. But, unless you want to spend 10x that on a used Shufflemaster it's kind of the only game in town.
At any rate, thanks again.... & I guess we can stop hijacking Jason's turf & return everyone to their regularly scheduled card sales infomercials.
200 Motels
Flush
Finally got a deck of 4 color Desjgn in play last night. They feel a lot different than the Desjgn poker size (not just because the 4 color are bridge size) but they felt smoother/less textured and a little stiffer. I tried to make a crimp in the joker just to test the durability and it was very durable only bending with very forceful use and it bent back into shape easily.
Undream
Two Pair
Inaugural night with the shuffletech report:
I purchase two sets of Desjn cards. A set of the older Modiano poker size, and a set of the newer dal negro. I ripped open one deck of each.
Before my game I ran each set through the shuffletech 3-4 times without troubles... So figured I was in good shape.
Night started. A few people immediately noticed new cards at the table.
In the first hour of play, the Modiano deck jammed two times. I was able to recover both with a quick nudge of a few cards in the shuffletech with my hand. The Dal Negro deck also jammed twice in the first hour. One was a quick fix. The other time, several cards managed to turn 90 degrees in the shuffler, I had to take out all the cards manually and do a hard reset on it. I was convinced I would be switching back to copags.. but I decided to given them another half an hour.
To my pleasant surprise, the next 5 hours were flawless. No jams. No issues.
So, on to the report from my players, and me.
Personally, I liked the Modiano cards. I think I am in agreement with @Dix in that if I was hand shuffling these things would absolutely be preferred.
That said, the vote from my players ( we had a full table of 10!!) Was for the Dal Negro. They thought they felt sturdier and really liked the texture.
Honestly, they are both awesome in their own way.
I am hoping that the shuffletech continues to play nice with them as we use them for a few more sessions.
Thanks @desjgn !!
I purchase two sets of Desjn cards. A set of the older Modiano poker size, and a set of the newer dal negro. I ripped open one deck of each.
Before my game I ran each set through the shuffletech 3-4 times without troubles... So figured I was in good shape.
Night started. A few people immediately noticed new cards at the table.
In the first hour of play, the Modiano deck jammed two times. I was able to recover both with a quick nudge of a few cards in the shuffletech with my hand. The Dal Negro deck also jammed twice in the first hour. One was a quick fix. The other time, several cards managed to turn 90 degrees in the shuffler, I had to take out all the cards manually and do a hard reset on it. I was convinced I would be switching back to copags.. but I decided to given them another half an hour.
To my pleasant surprise, the next 5 hours were flawless. No jams. No issues.
So, on to the report from my players, and me.
Personally, I liked the Modiano cards. I think I am in agreement with @Dix in that if I was hand shuffling these things would absolutely be preferred.
That said, the vote from my players ( we had a full table of 10!!) Was for the Dal Negro. They thought they felt sturdier and really liked the texture.
Honestly, they are both awesome in their own way.
I am hoping that the shuffletech continues to play nice with them as we use them for a few more sessions.
Thanks @desjgn !!
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
Maybe just a little "break-in" of a fresh deck is in order?
Dealer likes one, players like the other.... Probably not the 1st time in history for that.
CantSpellPoker
Straight
@desjgn Apologies if this has been addressed, I haven’t read through the whole thread.
Is there a reason why the Gorgon/Sphinx and Dragon/Kraken setups for the Classic Victorian poker/jumbo cards are so much more textured than the Wyvern/Phoenix setup?
I already had the Wyvern/Phoenix poker/jumbo setup and it’s my favorite. I ordered the other two setups and was surprised to see such a texture difference, considering they’re all advertised as “Classic Victorians.”
Perhaps there was a switch to a new card stock at some point that I wasn’t aware of? Just curious.
Is there a reason why the Gorgon/Sphinx and Dragon/Kraken setups for the Classic Victorian poker/jumbo cards are so much more textured than the Wyvern/Phoenix setup?
I already had the Wyvern/Phoenix poker/jumbo setup and it’s my favorite. I ordered the other two setups and was surprised to see such a texture difference, considering they’re all advertised as “Classic Victorians.”
Perhaps there was a switch to a new card stock at some point that I wasn’t aware of? Just curious.
Precisely. It's THE reason why Modiano are persona non grata around these parts.
CantSpellPoker
Straight
Right, I know the Modiano story, but I guess I’m not well versed in the actual specifics. Are the Wyvern/Phoenix setups Modiano stock and the others are something else?
I'm pretty sure, and Jason can chime in on this, that the older Victorians are Modiano stock, and the newer Victorians are Dal Negro stock.
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
Yup, exactly.... The Wyvern/Phoenix sets are leftover Modiano stock. Which is why I bought up a few sets.
I have a post a page back with specifics on the difference.
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/ordering-links.16572/post-958536
Coincidentally, I've actually been working on a little project which expands on that post. Watch the Poker Playing Cards forum, I'm working on it as I type this.
I have a post a page back with specifics on the difference.
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/ordering-links.16572/post-958536
Coincidentally, I've actually been working on a little project which expands on that post. Watch the Poker Playing Cards forum, I'm working on it as I type this.
CantSpellPoker
Straight
Great post that describes exactly what I was asking about. Thanks. Unfortunately, the Dal Negro cards feel more like sandpaper when comparing them side by side to the original Classic Victorians or Classic Flourish, which are my absolute two favorite decks.
The only reason I even brought it up is because I would have loved to see the original Classic Victorian in more/different colors, but obviously that ship has sailed at this point.
I just ordered another couple of setups of the Wyvern/Phoenix to ensure that I have enough to last me for the foreseeable future.
So I got my set of Gorgon/Sphynx/Dragon/Kraken for last week's game. Everyone absolutely loved them - biggest comment by far was that they had the durability of plastic, but the slightly extra texture on the cards prevented the zero-friction-fly-off-the-table problem. They slid around nicely, but it wasn't air hockey.
Are you saying that the Wyvern/Phoenix are actually slicker? Also - if those are old stock Modiano, aren't you taking a chance on buying up the old stock that they'll have the same QC issues?
OP
OP
Thank you @CantSpellPoker and my apologies for a tardy reply. Thank you the responses @Dix and @JMC9389. I do have extra Wyvern (18) and Chimaera (16) that could make sets, but it isn’t the best of contrast. I am curious to hear opinions on Dal Negro stock and if I should continue with it. I like the texture on both production runs.
Last edited:
OP
OP
Thank you @BearMetal for the compliments. The Wyvern/Phoenix didn’t have the QC issues. They are just a little thinner and have a different texture. I could send you a couple of sample cards so that you can compare.
I vote yes on the current Dal Negro textured stock. Even out of the shrink wrap, they weren't at all slick and are a dream to shuffle in a rotating dealer game. I can see how a dedicated dealer may get tired with a long session, as the stock is a bit on the thicker and stiffer side, which is what I like personally. I can also see how someone who may prefer a thinner, smoother stock may not like these, as well.
If you're asking me though, keep them coming!
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
(damn, I type too slow )
@BearMetal : Yea, The QC issue was with the Red (& a few Blue) decks only. Orange & Brown are fine. (as was Green & Purple)
Are the Modiano stock cards slicker?... Yea, somewhat. Same as any other linen finish card. I can see if you play on a hard tabletop where the more textured decks might be preferable.
My preference has to do with being a dealer. The softer Modiano stock shuffles much easier, and being slightly slicker they deal out perfectly without even paying attention. But they're not so slick they can be occasionally unmanageable.
IMO there's a reason the "Linen" finish has become something of a classic pseudo-standard amongst the majority of higher-end cards.
With Dal Negro's texture sometimes two cards try to come off the deck at once if you have a light touch.
So I guess I'll have to be a "no" on Dal Negro to balance out @JMC9389 above. At least on the textured stock. Whatever stock they use for the "Texas Poker" line is better feeling IMO. (and probably cheaper) Although, that is also rather stiff.
)@BearMetal : Yea, The QC issue was with the Red (& a few Blue) decks only. Orange & Brown are fine. (as was Green & Purple)
Are the Modiano stock cards slicker?... Yea, somewhat. Same as any other linen finish card. I can see if you play on a hard tabletop where the more textured decks might be preferable.
My preference has to do with being a dealer. The softer Modiano stock shuffles much easier, and being slightly slicker they deal out perfectly without even paying attention. But they're not so slick they can be occasionally unmanageable.
IMO there's a reason the "Linen" finish has become something of a classic pseudo-standard amongst the majority of higher-end cards.
With Dal Negro's texture sometimes two cards try to come off the deck at once if you have a light touch.
So I guess I'll have to be a "no" on Dal Negro to balance out @JMC9389 above. At least on the textured stock. Whatever stock they use for the "Texas Poker" line is better feeling IMO. (and probably cheaper) Although, that is also rather stiff.
CantSpellPoker
Straight
Make no mistake that I believe it is still a good product on its own. If that was the first product line I tried, I'd still like it. I just happen to prefer the original Modiano stock. I can't find any fault with them, other than my previously stated desire for more colors.
If you're constantly shuffling, the original Classic Victorians are just so easy, especially if you're riffling and pushing them together. They glide together like a dream, whereas lots of other stocks require some effort to get the cards to come together. If you're doing an in-hand shuffle with a "bridge" finish, I don't care nearly as much.
@desjgn - No need - I just bought some 
... Can't wait to compare them.
Something that I should mention is that my current table has a leather playing surface. This does make slick cards get up to 88MPH really easily. Perhaps this is why I hesitated moving to plastic cards for so long. Could also be why I love the texture and slide of the Dal Negro.
I just ordered my first big-boy table from Chanman and it's going to have the custom speed felt. So, that might change how I feel. Perhaps the Dal Negro cards will slow down too much on the felt. Luckily, I have some Wyvern/Phoenix coming my way so I can do a comparison...
... Can't wait to compare them. Something that I should mention is that my current table has a leather playing surface. This does make slick cards get up to 88MPH really easily. Perhaps this is why I hesitated moving to plastic cards for so long. Could also be why I love the texture and slide of the Dal Negro.
I just ordered my first big-boy table from Chanman and it's going to have the custom speed felt. So, that might change how I feel. Perhaps the Dal Negro cards will slow down too much on the felt. Luckily, I have some Wyvern/Phoenix coming my way so I can do a comparison...
jcooper911
Two Pair
I’m a fan of the Dal Negro, the textured tactile feel is preferable to me and the crew! Desjgn cards only all my games!
You are so right. Besides having a smoother stock, the cards are similar to the current Victorian's and shuffle just as well. The OG Grand Victorian's feel very similar to the ModiaNO Acetates that go for $30 a set up.
I've found that the stock is just about the same thickness and the weight is about the same, but as you say, the only difference is that the stock is smooth rather than textured. It's just a matter of preference. The Texas Poker stock is still very good. I like a thicker stock compared to KEM's and Copag's that are floppy and soft. Again, just a matter of preference.(damn, I type too slow
@BearMetal : Yea, The QC issue was with the Red (& a few Blue) decks only. Orange & Brown are fine. (as was Green & Purple)
Are the Modiano stock cards slicker?... Yea, somewhat. Same as any other linen finish card. I can see if you play on a hard tabletop where the more textured decks might be preferable.
My preference has to do with being a dealer. The softer Modiano stock shuffles much easier, and being slightly slicker they deal out perfectly without even paying attention. But they're not so slick they can be occasionally unmanageable.
IMO there's a reason the "Linen" finish has become something of a classic pseudo-standard amongst the majority of higher-end cards.
With Dal Negro's texture sometimes two cards try to come off the deck at once if you have a light touch.
So I guess I'll have to be a "no" on Dal Negro to balance out @JMC9389 above. At least on the textured stock. Whatever stock they use for the "Texas Poker" line is better feeling IMO. (and probably cheaper) Although, that is also rather stiff.
I got my delivery of Wyvern/Phoenix today and played some heads up hold em with them. They're awesome too. Could be the bourbon talking, but I think I prefer the grit of the Dal Negros. With that said, I still love this design... Grit or not. What a freaking awesome collection...
Dix
3 of a Kind
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Messages
- 733
- Reaction score
- 971
If you haven't seen it yet, the "project" I mentioned above is up that breaks down all the decks I currently have kicking around...
https://www.pokerchipforum.com/threads/the-redneck-poker-card-database.52229/
Boredom is a dangerous thing in these parts.
I believe you're right about the difference with the Dal Negro decks. They likely are on the same base stock, with the slight difference in stiffness coming from the textured coating.
Last edited:
CantSpellPoker
Straight
I snagged some Casino’s - they were delivered today. They are AWESOME! I like the feel and the color/designs so much that I’d probably overlook my preference for poker sized cards when selecting a deck to play with.
Disclaimer: My husband and are are not poker players, but are super casual players of card games who want to play games with better cards.
He riffle shuffles and I bridge shuffle. We have a set up of the green and purple poker sized classic victorians (I believe!) and he has a preference for those, while I prefer bridge sized cards and use our new 4 color set up when I am shuffling/dealing. Also, neither of us do the super sneak peek keep them on the board look (it is just the two of us playing) so jumbo index is fine by us. So, I like the newer card stock a lot, my husband slightly prefers the older stock but certainly has no problem using the newer stock.
All lovely cards.
He riffle shuffles and I bridge shuffle. We have a set up of the green and purple poker sized classic victorians (I believe!) and he has a preference for those, while I prefer bridge sized cards and use our new 4 color set up when I am shuffling/dealing. Also, neither of us do the super sneak peek keep them on the board look (it is just the two of us playing) so jumbo index is fine by us. So, I like the newer card stock a lot, my husband slightly prefers the older stock but certainly has no problem using the newer stock.
All lovely cards.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account and join our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.