I'm not ignoring anything. Take this hypothetical situation:
Let's say a big usable tournament set of CDI98 came up for sale at a reasonable price. I happen to be first to see it. I don't need it, I have enough money to buy it, but I know several friends on the site that would love to have it as well. I want them to get it before the unwashed heathen get a chance at it. So, I call "dibs".
Oho, but this is not enough for me. I want to say specific dibs for someone else, say
@Phish1321 . But what, I'm thinking, if he doesn't wake up for check PCF for the next four hours? Maybe I should be careful and specify that if he doesn't want it, then
@Polochris should be next, so I dibs for him, too. But wait, there's also
@horseshoez , who really helped me out a few times for the same chip series, so I 3rd dibs for him. And I can't forget
@Steppenwolf , because he's always in like a dirty shirt for these sorts of things, so I 4th dibs for him. If all of them pass, then I'll pony up the cash myself.
Gets ridiculous, doesn't it? And in what world would this system be fair?
So, instead, I either buy everything myself and then make a deal privately, or I tag everybody who I think wants it and let fate decide.