As a wise, in-the-know chipper pointed out to me, we know Angel have been transferring casinos to hotstamps over the past couple of years, so, yeah...I can’t imagine every making them hot stamps.
As a wise, in-the-know chipper pointed out to me, we know Angel have been transferring casinos to hotstamps over the past couple of years, so, yeah...I can’t imagine every making them hot stamps.
I’m not exactly sure what you and @LeGold r saying…To my knowledge there's only one person restamping. While he's doing a fantastic job, I wouldn't design around that. Mill + relabel can come out noticeably worse than inlay and removal IMO.
Someone got a Kifer cloner? Otherwise, I still don't see the point in hot stamping NAGB chips. Also adds a lot of extra time and cost. From purely the perspective of maximizing customization options for the community, you can't tell me new stamped chips are superior to new inlaid chips.The Tigers were extremely easy for Kifer to defoil.
Other than the baby blue chips, you can’t see the old stamp…I think NAGB fresh foiled chips are ideal to restamp…
View attachment 1472286
If it was out of their control that's something different. And interesting.As a wise, in-the-know chipper pointed out to me, we know Angel have been transferring casinos to hotstamps over the past couple of years, so, yeah...
I love hot stamps, and now I have a custom THC hot stamp set. Same price as paying for mill work + labels + time it takes putting them on.Otherwise, I still don't see the point in hot stamping NAGB chips.
That’s a valid point. Maybe 10% of the community is interested in restamping.From purely the perspective of maximizing customization options for the community, you can't tell me new stamped chips are superior to new inlaid chips.
If it was out of their control that's something different. And interesting.
At least you didn't mill them...I love hot stamps, and now I have a custom THC hot stamp set. Same price as paying for mill work + labels + time it takes putting them on.
Keep the controversial takes coming @FestiveKnight
View attachment 1472292
Don’t look @Tonystark137 lol
View attachment 1472293
If someone is looking to mill T1, I’d be interested in trading for 2 racks of T5…At least you didn't mill them...
Maybe if it looked like what a Tiger VIP3 would look like they would get hit with the big fee that the tiger folks got hit with, for having beautiful chipsMaybe design choice was limited, but these to me look like a casino made them, not a chipper/designer.
Those two statements are somewhat contradicting.Maybe if it looked like what a Tiger VIP3 would look like they would get hit with the big fee that the tiger folks got hit with, for having beautiful chips
So best to look like other casino chips to get the order through?
Don’t ever recall that. But he did have to pay more on some of the complex edge spots and maybe the IHC/FHC, but I am assuming that’s a minimal surcharge.From what I heard Paulson charged Ken more because of how good the chips looked or something to that nature. Can search for the post after work.
Perheps, depend on the chips. The recent NAGBs have shown to have non-round labels :/To my knowledge there's only one person restamping. While he's doing a fantastic job, I wouldn't design around that. Mill + relabel can come out noticeably worse than inlay and removal IMO.
Correct. No secret sketchy pricing. Will be a public vendor sale by Ken. I won’t reveal too much, but before rumors swirl further, GPI raised their prices EXPONENTIALLY. On top of that you should see the ABSURD fees they charge for absolutely no reason. On top of that - Ken somehow convinced GPI (and we paid premium to boot) for them to let us give bearclaws, 3tas, and 4ta one final spin.
I'm saying what you're saying - stamps can be restamped, and can look fab!I’m not exactly sure what you and @LeGold r saying…
But the Tigers were extremely easy for Kifer to defoil.
Other than the baby blue chips, you can’t see the old stamp…I think NAGB fresh foiled chips are ideal to restamp…
View attachment 1472286
Never been a fan of any hot stamped chip. Old Vegas, new vegas, NAGB, customs, etc., they are just not my thing. I have never owned any in bulk and doubt I ever will. Plenty of people love them though. Why, I have no idea...lol. I am thankful he brought new clay to the forum.Go back a while in this thread and you’ll see me arguing about the intended purpose of NAGB chips from the last time around. Over time I really came to appreciate Jeep’s work but I can’t help but thinking that hot stamp NAGB is incredibly dumb lol when some significant part of the purpose of a NAGB chip is to be relabeled. The barrier to further customization is so much higher with HS than inlays. I’m sure I’m like everyone else in having day dreamed about running my own NAGB (especially while unemployed) and I can’t imagine every making them hot stamps.
Not railing on the particular design of the chips. Just seems weird to be all excited about “new clay for the community” and at the same time it’s “explicitly chosen to be less flexible new clay”
I’m not the most rehearsed in tiger lore, but I would imagine it’s much more likely that they charged him more because they knew they were being re-sold for a profit, not for casino use. Although that is just speculation. We will never actually know unless Ken spills the beans.From the "So It Begins" thread, Jeep posted there was an absurd upcharge from GPI on the tigers, unrelated to edge spots lol. So there might be a tax on good looking S tier chips.
Never been a fan of any hot stamped chip. Old Vegas, new vegas, NAGB, customs, etc., they are just not my thing. I have never owned any in bulk and doubt I ever will. Plenty of people love them though. Why, I have no idea...lol. I am thankful he brought new clay to the forum.
Would rather see discussions of the merits of new clay chips as opposed to talk of some dusty looking painted ceramics from China any day of the year.
Presumably “good locks” is short hand for complicated edge spots/ larger chips because generally “good” equals bright colors with complex spots. If such a fee exists, we can assume it’s a production difficultly scale (like CPC) and not an aesthetics oneI’m not the most rehearsed in tiger lore, but I would imagine it’s much more likely that they charged him more because they knew they were being re-sold for a profit, not for casino use. Although that is just speculation. We will never actually know unless Ken spills the beans.
It seems unlikely that GPI would subjectively charge higher prices based on how “good” chips look.
Had no clue about that.Maybe if it looked like what a Tiger VIP3 would look like they would get hit with the big fee that the tiger folks got hit with, for having beautiful chips
So best to look like other casino chips to get the order through?
Love love love it.Keep the controversial takes coming @FestiveKnight
View attachment 1472292
Don’t look @Tonystark137 lol
View attachment 1472293
That’s like saying tax fraud isn’t illegal, you just need to know the very obscure loopholes to commit it.It should stop being said that GPI will not sell to the Public. That’s just not true. It’s just the combination to the safe, or vault as it were, is not publicly known.
Jeepology claimed that those upcharges were on top of the complicated edge spot upcharge.Presumably “good locks” is short hand for complicated edge spots/ larger chips because generally “good” equals bright colors with complex spots. If such a fee exists, we can assume it’s a production difficultly scale (like CPC) and not an aesthetics one
GPI raised their prices EXPONENTIALLY. On top of that you should see the ABSURD fees they charge for absolutely no reason. On top of that - Ken somehow convinced GPI (and we paid premium to boot) for them to let us give bearclaws, 3tas, and 4ta one final spin. They were already retired, but this was their final rodeo…
Theoretically you can still mill these chips and put whatever inlay you want for resale. But yeah these are a forever set.Had no clue about that.
Love love love it.
Who knows, years from now we may look fondly back on all the hot stamped projects. But you swung for the fences, most folks prefer to over label rather than murder to keep value intact, let alone purchase a HUGE nagb set, murder, and stamp with a highly personal stamp.
Don’t get me wrong - mad respect to the commitment, I love it. We just don’t see it these days. Maybe with a hot stamped nagb at a smaller $5-600 a rack price point, we’ll see many more projects (which would be AWESOME).
I just don’t know that we have a ton of folks here that are prepared to drop $5,000 - $10,000 on a forever set that they can’t get money back on. Then again, that’s pretty much every CPC set![]()
Hey these are people that require time pieces that show time to the second and get upset if their watch is off three minutes every leap year.By the same virtue, cards don't need indices either. We should just use the old style cards. If you can't identify the rank of cards just by looking at how everyone else is playing them, you should quit poker.
View attachment 1465513
FWIW, I was specifically told that wasn’t true.they knew they were being re-sold for a profit
... they don't have a price list. Each sales region is different, each customer is different, and each order is different -- and the invoice contains a wide array of charges for various things related to the order, including chip costs.
Two identical orders from two different customers via two different sales offices/rep will not be priced identically. Even back-to-back orders/re-orders will differ.
It's the manufacturer who makes chip pricing transparency almost impossible, and I'd guess it's intentional. Best you can do is estimate a price ~range~ for most chip types and customers/regions.
Basically, GPI are like drug dealers. In more ways than one.Just to clear up some pricing controversies that have (and are being) repeated about NAGB endeavors. This happens every time there is a new set of NAGB chips hitting the market. And I see a lot of nitpicking.
Dave has, on multiple occasions, posted a very accurate synopsis about pricing at GPI, and it's this:
I'll add some more: there is absolutely no official price list at GPI. The price is determined by what they claim is a complicated formula. This is based on colors, spot patters, hot stamp vs. label, region, quantity ordered of a particular chip (there are some small price breaks at some levels), size of the entire order, type of customer, and supposedly several other factors. There is also a sales review, internal management review, and other factors based on some individual licensee considerations, factory utilization at the moment, etc. There is also speed of production that can have an impact. Sometimes the factory is busy and they quote you 6-9 months, and other times they can do your job in 30-60 days.
Many posters here still refer to pricing of the original NAGB or those from pre-pandemic, as if nothing has changed in the last 5-10 years. I believe the Star NAGB was in 2014/2015. BTP and SB NAGBs were shortly after and from pre-pandemic days. GPI has been acquired since, their internal processes have changed and, as of now, they no longer offer clay chips to new customers in nearly 3/4 of the world. and to top it all off, we have had a significant/stubborn inflation in the last few years. I don't know how much the latest NAGB chips cost, but I am certain it's meaningfully higher than the first NAGB 10 years ago (I haven't followed them, but I presume the price of new Tina chips are double or triple what the old China Clay chips used to be 10 years ago).
Always good to see more minty THC chips in the market...moar is always better, especially given where this market is headed.
Chippers who disagree with facts:Just to clear up some pricing controversies that have (and are being) repeated about NAGB endeavors. This happens every time there is a new set of NAGB chips hitting the market. And I see a lot of nitpicking.
Dave has, on multiple occasions, posted a very accurate synopsis about pricing at GPI, and it's this:
I'll add some more: there is absolutely no official price list at GPI. The price is determined by what they claim is a complicated formula. This is based on colors, spot patters, hot stamp vs. label, region, quantity ordered of a particular chip (there are some small price breaks at some levels), size of the entire order, type of customer, and supposedly several other factors. There is also a sales review, internal management review, and other factors based on some individual licensee considerations, factory utilization at the moment, etc. There is also speed of production that can have an impact. Sometimes the factory is busy and they quote you 6-9 months, and other times they can do your job in 30-60 days.
Many posters here still refer to pricing of the original NAGB or those from pre-pandemic, as if nothing has changed in the last 5-10 years. I believe the Star NAGB was in 2014/2015. BTP and SB NAGBs were shortly after and from pre-pandemic days. GPI has been acquired since, their internal processes have changed and, as of now, they no longer offer clay chips to new customers in nearly 3/4 of the world. and to top it all off, we have had a significant/stubborn inflation in the last few years. I don't know how much the latest NAGB chips cost, but I am certain it's meaningfully higher than the first NAGB 10 years ago (I haven't followed them, but I presume the price of new Tina chips are double or triple what the old China Clay chips used to be 10 years ago).
Always good to see more minty THC chips in the market...moar is always better, especially given where this market is headed.