ssanel54
Flush
the colors pop, but if your talking about all time greats, it seems rather ordinary
-
This site contains affiliate links. If you choose to make a purchase after clicking a link, Poker Chip Forum may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!
Explain the Wynn Chip Hype to Me Like I'm a 4 Year Old (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter justsomedude
- Start date
- Status
the colors pop, but if your talking about all time greats, it seems rather ordinary
yep, serious poker pros, those two. WGAF? Not me.....Beyonce Knowles and Heidi Klum played with these. If that's not enough history for you, then I don't know what is
Totally agree. The T1000 and T5000 are nice, but the rest of the lineup is pretty ho-hum.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
This is the most well executed implementation of color combinations within and across denoms that I have ever seen in a set.
OP
OP
justsomedude
Straight Flush
Yeah, some times I use my left hand instead, just because it feels like....
ohhhhhhhh, wait... that's not what you were talking about!
This is one of those democrats vs. republican arguments that no one can win. There are people who like the colors, and those who don't. There are people who are adamant these are not 'real' casino chips because they were not approved by proper casino authorities, and people who argue that such semantics are not necessary or correct, as these are clearly Wynn chips, made with the same standards and by the same vendors making casino quality chips for Wynn and other casinos. And no matter how one would argue this point, it will never go over the stubborn beliefs of some people.
It will end up being just like an endless political argument. No way to 'win' or convince the other side that they are wrong.
I agree that the Wynn chips are immaculate and one of the best chips around, probably approved by a man whose meticulous attention to details is next to none. I wish I could have a large set, but will never pay $4+ for these chips to build a large set (same for ANY chip actually). But hey, the ACF chips are pretty awesome too.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
This is one of those democrats vs. republican arguments that no one can win. There are people who like the colors, and those who don't. There are people who are adamant these are not 'real' casino chips because they were not approved by proper casino authorities, and people who argue that such semantics are not necessary or correct, as these are clearly Wynn chips, made with the same standards and by the same vendors making casino quality chips for Wynn and other casinos. And no matter how one would argue this point, it will never go over the stubborn beliefs of some people.
It will end up being just like an endless political argument. No way to 'win' or convince the other side that they are wrong.
I agree that the Wynn chips are immaculate and one of the best chips around, probably approved by a man whose meticulous attention to details is next to none. I wish I could have a large set, but will never pay $4+ for these chips to build a large set (same for ANY chip actually). But hey, the ACF chips are pretty awesome too.
Ya, I wanted Bernie Sanders too...
ssanel54
Flush
Cmon? Are you limiting this to inlaid tournament chips?
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
I'm not limiting to to anything at all. These are the best I've ever seen for my tastes. I'm open to counter argument pr0n though (y) :thumbsup: Certainly there are many sets I've yet to lay eyes on. But for my tastes, these are the best I've ever seen.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
I'll add this note as well. Out of all the chip sets I own, this is the only set that I've created a custom case for.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
Yes. 100% certain about that. I truly don't GAF about celebs. But some people do, so I draw attention to it
I LOVE THAT CASE. The chips inside . . . well tastes are subjective.
Historically speaking these are the most exclusive Paulson chips ever produced. They are so exclusive that a bunch of self proclaimed chip experts can't agree on their proper classification. They are a special order set with ties to a casino name made by the best casino chip manufacturer bar none. The absence of a mold is particularly impressive and the colors combinations are remarkably good. The inlays, while lacking a Golden Horseshoe, are simple and effective.
You're gonna have to provide documentation to that effect for your statement to be considered anything beyond your opinion. I can think of several Paulson sets off-hand that most experts would consider to be more exclusive.
I think the experts are pretty unanimous in classifying these as fantasy/charity non-casino chips.
No argument there.
Actually, the use of the no-markings mold is pretty much defacto proof that these were not considered casino chips by the manufacturer.... i.e., not produced on a casino mold. I fail to see how it could be considered impressive; it was merely necessary in order to have them produced at all.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
You can call them charity event chips, but you can't call them "fantasy" chips. That's an entirely different category. "Fantasy" chips should be reserved for fake casinos that never existed.
OP
OP
justsomedude
Straight Flush
This is the best assessment I've seen yet regarding the no-mold.
I'm sure Paulson didn't want their house branding put on chips that were not intended for casino use. The no-mold was most likely their out for not having to say "no" to Wynn's request, and for basically pulling off what was ultimately a corporate favor.
A unique set, indeed. Whether or not that is "impressive" remains to be seen. I'm sure collectors will determine that as prices are set by supply/demand on the open market in the years and decades to come.
Actually, the 'fantasy' category includes all types of non-casino chips, including chips like these. Several 'fantasy' sets actually saw use.
I think the experts are pretty unanimous in classifying these as fantasy/charity non-casino chips.
I just Googled "Fantasy/Charity Non-Casino Chips" and no such classification exists. Did you just arbitrarily add the word "charity" to an existing chip classification?
Not arbitrarily added.... it's been confirmed that these were chips made for a charity event. To break it down for you, I think most experts consider these:
- fantasy chips
- charity event chips
- non-casino chips
Self proclaimed experts?
OP
OP
justsomedude
Straight Flush
Yes. 100% certain about that. I truly don't GAF about celebs. But some people do, so I draw attention to it
To add another notch on that belt... it may appear as if the now sitting President and hot-sexy First Lady may have used them as well!
http://www.gettyimages.com/license/115300243
New classification???
Fantasy/Charity President and First Lady Played Poker Chip Set.
The old FCPFLPPCS! A rare one indeed!!!!!
Is it strange that I find it slightly funny he appears to take a bit of offense at the "Fantasy" classification?
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
I have no doubt that the no-mold factor had to do with them being produced for a charity event and not to be used on the casino floor. But for me, it just adds to the rarity and collectibility of this set. No mold Paulsons are so rare that when these first came out, a lot of experienced chippers didn't even know who made them. Most people were proposing that they were BCCs. It would have taken an extremely keen eye and a lot of experience to know otherwise. These are some of the most unique chips ever made for several reasons. Add in the fact that they're minty, perfect breakdowns for tourneys, and the remarkable color combination, and these are hands down my favorite tourney set.
He wasn't self proclaimed.
OP
OP
justsomedude
Straight Flush
And in the end... that's all that matters! (y) :thumbsup:
Well, there is clearly a difference between what he thinks "should" be considered fantasy chips and what are actually classified as fantasy chips.... by most experts (self-proclaimed or not).Is it strange that I find it slightly funny he appears to take a bit of offense at the "Fantasy" classification?
What I find amusing is that he cares about it at all. Doesn't affect the rarity or uniqueness of the set one little bit.... just provides a more accurate descriptor.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
Is it strange that I find it slightly funny he appears to take a bit of offense at the "Fantasy" classification?
Me? Not at all. I actually really like fantasy sets. I've said many times that the Le Cove's and 21st Century chips are some of my all time favorite cash sets. I'd MUCH rather have those than most "casino" sets that are out there. I'm just pointing out that these are not "fantasy" chips at all. Words have meaning, and the term 'fantasy' in reference to a casino implies that it's a fictional casino - i.e. Casino de Isthmus, Casino de Mexico, Le Cove, etc. The Wynn, on the other hand, is not a fictional casino. So the term shouldn't apply.
RainmanTrail
Straight Flush
And yes, Dave is definitely THE expert. However, even experts have their own opinions. I'm just glad my opinion happens to differ with his this time. Otherwise, I think I might be gawking at HIS set of Wynns instead of mine
- Status
Similar threads
