Hustler Casino Live (5 Viewers)

I’m just a casual observer that won’t jump to conclusions on accusing someone of cheating when there’s no proof

And there still isn’t


And I’m not sure most of the ‘she cheated’ realize how bad it is to accuse someone of something like that. Without hard evidence.

Post me there was hard evidence but there was no prosecution. That is not the same situation

Here we have … ‘ I just don’t like the call. It’s suspicious ‘ that’s it

I agree calling someone a cheater is pretty damn harsh without proof. I’ve personally tried focusing on words like “suspect,” “dodgy,” “bizarre,” etc, for this very reason.

That being said, I think it’s been demonstrated that this goes quite a bit beyond the “I just don’t like the call” talk.

The combination of her banter, contradictory statements, odd tanking and time bank use, giving money back, and now not pressing charges, all starts adding up in a really really weird way. Eventually, we can no longer blame coincidence, and we have to start believing our eyes.

I’d personally love more proof. And hopefully we get it.
 
Look at her. Something tells me she likes attention.
Edit -

I am starting to agree, it’s not looking good. But still curious as to the why/motivation.

But to your point, she could just want to break into the poker world quickly. Who knows, the motivations aren’t usually rational, the more I think about it - lol.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone confirm if Robbi’s husband is wealthy? I seem to recall reading or hearing on a pod cast that her husband was quite wealthy. All things considered, these are not large sums of money to her/them..

Just trying to drill down to motive, etc to explain some of the actions. If she did cheat, was it for money..? Maybe fame, maybe a grudge against Garrett…? Total speculation at this point, Just trying to get at motive.

Her Husband is Charles Lew, an attorney, a partner in a Capital Firm, owns a few businesses (restaurants and such if I recall correctly) and created an attorney-based NFT to my recollection.

Their home was purchased for $1.8 million back in 2015, but she works in LA so the area is pricey and it certainly doesn't look like a mansion from the street view, one off-street parking spot and a pretty tightly packed street with cars parked on the side of the road, nothing all that luxurious about it. Zillow has the home valued at over $3 million now.

Robbi's LinkedIn shows she held a previous position that had a median income of 375k/year but for the past couple of years has been in a position where the median pay is 175K/year (i.e. she has been making half what she used to, while the cost of living has been rising, and based on the plastic surgery she definitely likes to keep up with the joneses)

No idea on the financial situation with her husband and where he stands, if he's fallen on hard times or not. But from what I recall of NFT's it's kinda scummy so....
 
I’m just a casual observer that won’t jump to conclusions on accusing someone of cheating when there’s no proof

And there still isn’t


And I’m not sure most of the ‘she cheated’ realize how bad it is to accuse someone of something like that. Without hard evidence.

With Postle there was hard evidence but there was no prosecution. That is not the same situation

Here we have … ‘ I just don’t like the call. It’s suspicious ‘ that’s it
We have SO much more than just "I don't like the call". like SO SO much more.

the call, the body language of waiting, not thinking, the explanation, the returning the money, the changing stories, the undisclosed staking by another at the table, that player buying in for the minimum, that player getting mad at her returning the money, the changing story again, then one of the FEW people with access to the graphics stealing money from her of all people, after she gave away the money she 'won' in the pot, her not pressing charges against him, but threatening legal action against HCL and Garrett.

SO much more than "I don't like the call".

It's one thing to have a shady employee, but to have the ONE person that could have helped her cheat, take money from her... come on man. Open your eyes.
 
After the employee rats out the scheme that Robbi was involved in I'm gonna be like

truth.gif
 
After the employee rats out the scheme that Robbi was involved in I'm gonna be like

View attachment 1001304

Ok. So not to put the cart before the horse - and discussing this in total hypothetical town - say the dude DOES confess… what kind of shit show follows? That would be one level up from the Postle investigation. Would there be criminal charges? Jail? How does that all unfold?
 
Ok. So not to put the cart before the horse - and discussing this in total hypothetical town - say the dude DOES confess… what kind of shit show follows? That would be one level up from the Postle investigation. Would there be criminal charges? Jail? How does that all unfold?

It'll take years to resolve legally. The wheels of justice turn EXTREMELY slow post-Covid
 
Her Husband is Charles Lew, an attorney, a partner in a Capital Firm, owns a few businesses (restaurants and such if I recall correctly) and created an attorney-based NFT to my recollection.

Their home was purchased for $1.8 million back in 2015, but she works in LA so the area is pricey and it certainly doesn't look like a mansion from the street view, one off-street parking spot and a pretty tightly packed street with cars parked on the side of the road, nothing all that luxurious about it. Zillow has the home valued at over $3 million now.

Robbi's LinkedIn shows she held a previous position that had a median income of 375k/year but for the past couple of years has been in a position where the median pay is 175K/year (i.e. she has been making half what she used to, while the cost of living has been rising, and based on the plastic surgery she definitely likes to keep up with the joneses)

No idea on the financial situation with her husband and where he stands, if he's fallen on hard times or not. But from what I recall of NFT's it's kinda scummy so....
Bruh...
 
Her Husband is Charles Lew, an attorney, a partner in a Capital Firm, owns a few businesses (restaurants and such if I recall correctly) and created an attorney-based NFT to my recollection.

Their home was purchased for $1.8 million back in 2015, but she works in LA so the area is pricey and it certainly doesn't look like a mansion from the street view, one off-street parking spot and a pretty tightly packed street with cars parked on the side of the road, nothing all that luxurious about it. Zillow has the home valued at over $3 million now.

Robbi's LinkedIn shows she held a previous position that had a median income of 375k/year but for the past couple of years has been in a position where the median pay is 175K/year (i.e. she has been making half what she used to, while the cost of living has been rising, and based on the plastic surgery she definitely likes to keep up with the joneses)

No idea on the financial situation with her husband and where he stands, if he's fallen on hard times or not. But from what I recall of NFT's it's kinda scummy so....
That's all well and good but the real question is how many pairs of underpants does he keep in his wardrobe?
 
I have a feeling you might be eating some humble pie soon.

The guy she didn’t press charges against is in charge of A LOT in that room.

Guy steals chips (around 10% of the hand in question) from her stack after she gives back money, she doesn’t press charges when’s he’s caught…

For saying there's not enough evidence of her cheating? For arguing against people who only had opinions?

There still isn't conclusive evidence she cheated. Yet. Or maybe never.

The one conclusive fact is this Bryan guy is a thief.

They should (and probably are) looking at footage from all previous streams to see if he's stolen chips in the past. There may be a good chance this isn't the first time he stole.

@Windwalker provides some interesting insight. But he's still not presenting any facts. Just opinions. Provides a potential mechanism for cheating, but so far no proof. Which is more plausible than anal beads, mouthing hands to one another (while being filmed), etc.

But it is interesting and one aspect I'm sure the investigators are reviewing. But the whole Bryan's cut was 10% = $15,000 is 100% made up conjecture.

I'm still waiting for more factual info.
 
For saying there's not enough evidence of her cheating? For arguing against people who only had opinions?

There still isn't conclusive evidence she cheated. Yet. Or maybe never.

The one conclusive fact is this Bryan guy is a thief.

They should (and probably are) looking at footage from all previous streams to see if he's stolen chips in the past. There may be a good chance this isn't the first time he stole.

@Windwalker provides some interesting insight. But he's still not presenting any facts. Just opinions. Provides a potential mechanism for cheating, but so far no proof. Which is more plausible than anal beads, mouthing hands to one another (while being filmed), etc.

But it is interesting and one aspect I'm sure the investigators are reviewing. But the whole Bryan's cut was 10% = $15,000 is 100% made up conjecture.

I'm still waiting for more factual info.
There was little factual info a couple of days ago, but it was all very suspect, you guys refused to accept it.

Now, they’ve basically found the smoking gun. If you think all of that is coincidence, you’re just really not that bright. Hell even in the Postle case they didn’t get the smoking gun on Justin or guys on the inside, here they did.

Robbi has an army of white knights who are so blind to this, sad to see them on here.

I’ve already stated why this is so damning, so I don’t need to again. But goddamn, at this point I think if she full on confessed you guys would write it off as her being pressured.

The funniest thing is have you not seen her silence now on Twitter? She’s been radio silent since this news broke.
 
See, that’s you doing the mental gymnastics. Now we’ve proven that it could technically be done, no more vibrating cups or butt plugs…now we have proof of the way it could, and likely was, done.

You really don’t see it? The giving back the money, the reaction from rip, the non disclosure of the backing, the flip flop story, the inside employee theft, the legal action threats, and yet the lack of pressing charges here?

It’s not 100%, but they never proved postle a cheater 100% either.

Glad to see it only took overwhelming evidence for you to say there’s a possibility she cheated now. At least we’re not being called misogynists anymore.
No one in this thread have proven anything. We're all passive spectators. So far, hired investigators uncovered a theft.

You come across as one of those guys who struts around saying 'WE WON!!' when the team you cheer for won a game. The athletes have trained their asses off their entire lives while you watched the game from your couch eating wings and drinking beer.

The Postle incident was entirely a different scandal. Not even remotely the same. The evidence compiled against Postle was enormous and damning.

There is still not an overwhelming amount of evidence. There's more than the zero there was prior. But to call it overwhelming is not accurate.
 
No one in this thread have proven anything. We're all passive spectators. So far, hired investigators uncovered a theft.

You come across as one of those guys who struts around saying 'WE WON!!' when the team you cheer for won a game. The athletes have trained their asses off their entire lives while you watched the game from your couch eating wings and drinking beer.
a.) they uncovered a theft, on the same night as a cheating scandal, by a guy who had the ability to cheat, and from the player being accused. This is not a coincidence.

B.) the fuck are you talking about? Football? Hockey? That’s so irrelevant to the topic at hand.
 
a.) they uncovered a theft, on the same night as a cheating scandal, by a guy who had the ability to cheat, and from the player being accused. This is not a coincidence.

B.) the fuck are you talking about? Football? Hockey? That’s so irrelevant to the topic at hand.
The whole: "We've proven it could technically be done". YOU have proven shit. You (we) are just spectators on a forum.

Maybe your College of Handsome Gentlemen needs a reading comprehension entrance exam.
 
The whole: "We've proven it could technically be done". YOU have proven shit. You (we) are just spectators on a forum.

Maybe your College of Handsome Gentlemen needs a reading comprehension entrance exam.
Jesus are you reaching hard to try and discredit me or my argument.

Fine THEY’VE fucking proven it. Happy now? You can white knight all you want… she ain’t going to see this.
 
Jesus are you reaching hard to try and discredit me or my argument.

Fine THEY’VE fucking proven it. Happy now? You can white knight all you want… she ain’t going to see this.
I'm still undecided. I don't have a vested interest one way or the other. I prefer to wait and see evidence before formulating a strong opinion.

But go ahead. Get your pitchfork ready, and get ready to burn this witch.
 
This whole affair is nothing but drama and gossip, and we find it compelling because humans are stupid and social like a pack of chimps. The only question that matters is "did she cheat" and the only evidence that she did is "she made a bad call". Absolutely everything else (on any side) is noise, screeching, and social signaling. It's got you spun around because you've become invested in it, understandably, thanks to the screeching chimp factor, but there's no there there for you to make sense of.

[shrug] It just means you're human.
We get more information - we get more screeching
 
Ok, so she either made an absolutely out of this world call against his specific hand, yet impossible call against his range of hands. Yes I know she probably doesn’t think of it in those terms, but surely she does realize he just as well holds Q8+ of hearts/clubs, not to mention a number of valuebets.

Or

her, Rip and this employee are in this together. My main problem with the cheating theory has been that there are too many logical leaps and that the misread theory just seemed like the simplest explanation.

However, with this latest info we have a scenario that to me seems to fit the actions of all involved.

1. The mic signal system. Dude in the control room signals to Rip that she should call who in turn signals to Robbi. Explains the how. Also explains Doug’s observation of how she appears to be waiting for something rather than actually thinking about the decision.

2. The card reader getting the cards mixed up explains why control room guy instructs her to call. J6cc is still a bad call (to observers) but it’s not inconceivable. She still has to be dumb enough to actually call, but I guess if she trusts her partners to give her correct info and doesn’t realize in real time how ridiculous the call would look, it makes sense.

3. Her weird attempts to explain the call and the constant changing of her story makes sense. If 2 is correct she wasn’t prepared for the aftermath. Perhaps in game she didn’t have one single thought about the actual poker hand but were in fact just waiting for the signal.

4. Rip getting pissed about her returning the money right away losing him his cut while it is drawing further suspicion to the call.

5. Control room dude is also pissed about her giving the money back and steals his cut from her stack.

6. After learning about 5 she does not want to press charges out of fear of being exposed.
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom