It’s a different type of allegation and investigation, but there is a ton of evidence in the Robbi case.
For example, the public found that:
1) Rip and Robbi did not disclose that they were partners;
2) Rip bought in for the minimum but staked Robbi a huge stack in a nosebleed game full of pros like Ivey and GE, despite her later admission to being a total amateur;
3) Rip and Robbi were mouthing stuff to each other;
4) Robbi changed her story and contradicted herself repeatedly, after playing a hand in such a bizarre way that a seasoned top pro felt he had to say something;
5) HCL hired a criminal for its booth;
6) That criminal rearranged the booth so he could not be viewed by the one camera in there;
7) That criminal took what looked like his “cut” from Robbi’s stack after the hand;
8) Robbi posted what many read as a fake message to her from the criminal, apologizing, full of the same rare verbal tells and spelling she uses herself;
9) Robbi gave back a six figure pot, something an innocent player would never do.
Among other things.
The investigation found:
A) There were multiple security flaws in the game setup that cheaters could exploit;
B) But due to the crudeness of their operation, and lack of key data to validate, they could not say for sure if these were in fact exploited.
)
