ngmcs8203
Flush
Donation while holding the 5th flush and what, the 15th nuts?
Gotta make sure to say "Yeah man, you had a flush, nothing you could do!"Donation while holding the 5th flush and what, the 15th nuts?
$98k-ish.Total pot size dragged?
He stole my move. Motherfucker.Donation while holding the 5th flush and what, the 15th nuts?
Not sure this line of thought is entirely accurate. I think it's beyond the actual call amount faced, and more to do with a) facing one vs two opponents, and b) how strong the second opponent appears to be.Hero is never folding. The only question is, what is more likely to get V1 to commit his stack, flatting or re-shoving?
V1 has hero and V2 covered. V1 checked the river. If he is calling V1's bet, he's calling hero's re-shove; he's not folding because we're making it $5k more. And the converse, if he's folding to hero's re-shove, he probably was folding to V2's shove. Bottom line, I don't think a hero flat vs a hero call is going to change what V1 does.
I tend to agree with this line of logic in general especially if V2 weren't already all in, but my concern is that an all-in with next to nothing on top (5k compared to the 25k previous all-in) to me never reads as an all-in bluff, since V2 can't be bet off his hand and the extra 5k on it's own is never getting V1 to fold. I think the weakest looking option for hero here is some sort of slow crying call.So what can hero do (or avoid) to help sway V1 to call? By staying in the hand but without indicating strength....and by indicating he would prefer to see V1 fold.
If weak=strong and strong=weak holds true, then raising all-in quickly and confidently by hero helps the most vs just quietly calling.
I understand what you're saying, but I'd consider a 'slow crying call' with another player yet to act as a classic weak=strong ploy, while an enthusiastic shove (regardless of actual size) as strong=weak -- and not necessarily meant as a bluff per se, but just getting all of their chips in play.I tend to agree with this line of logic in general especially if V2 weren't already all in, but my concern is that an all-in with next to nothing on top (5k compared to the 25k previous all-in) to me never reads as an all-in bluff, since V2 can't be bet off his hand and the extra 5k on it's own is never getting V1 to fold. I think the weakest looking option for hero here is some sort of slow crying call.
I guess what i'm saying is i'm not sure how much weak=strong and strong=weak holds true when one guy is already all in (so bluffing isn't on the table) and a shove is effectively the same as a call when it comes to pot odds.
Is V1 a Sicillian?I understand what you're saying, but I'd consider a 'slow crying call' with another player yet to act as a classic weak=strong ploy, while an enthusiastic shove (regardless of actual size) as strong=weak -- and not necessarily meant as a bluff per se, but just getting all of their chips in play.
This is almost a "Princess Bride" discussion, lol.
This was going to be my next answer lol.This is almost a "Princess Bride" discussion, lol.
I have a new idea for a card capper.This was going to be my next answer lol.
Don't forget the related Bounty chips:I have a new idea for a card capper.
"My name is Inigo Montoya. You kill my hand, prepare to die."
Copyright mrcatpants.
Vendor status incoming.
Don't forget the related Bounty chips:
"My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my stack, prepare to die."
That's the rebuy chip.For bounty, I'd rather use "INCONCEIVABLE!"