The overlap between the 50c/chip market and the $3/chip market is very small. I suspect if we never found a Chinese ceramic producer, the shoppers would be going to DiscountPokerShop, Apache, and BR Pro.
Not all. I only bought a Tina set because it was a super cheap way to test something. Once the test was complete, I sold the set, but was ready to eat the costs or keep it. Wouldn’t have bought the set at 2x cost.
No offense to BRPro and SunFly. In fact, if anything, it’s the opposite. I see them as a higher level of quality. Not totally sure if it’s true, but that’s the impression I have. I feel they’ve differentiated themselves enough that if I want a quality ceramic set that lasts, I go with them.
As for the polling question, do we need a separate composite section? Eh.
There are so many items in the classified that I don’t think it will make an impactful difference anyway. There are so many vague subject lines that I find myself opening way more sets than needed. Heck, I’m guilty… I dropped the cards mold from my add to attract more eyeballs.
I appreciate
@BGinGA ’s observation about Tina et al stealing mold designs- I (wrongly) assumed they were open molds. The CHC and small crown mold moves turned me off, but that’s the history of China… the violate IP laws to sell, learn, and get ahead (another topic for another forum). But then again, I doubt she’s stealing much (if any?) business from
CPC- many of those are direct replicas of
TRK chips with colors you can’t match at
CPC and ceramics can’t match
CPC.