@mods this is getting out of hand
Its just unreal there are people out here that cannot understand this stuff I have a basically retarded friend that use to to 3rd grade math in 12th grade and understands it perfectly
Obviously a question for “big tech” execs. Way beyond my pay grade.
If you didn't think that was sexy (a key component of sexy being the word sex) then you must have linked to a different video.
Do I think it was sexy? Yes. I like boobs. Especially those boobs.If you didn't think that was sexy (a key component of sexy being the word sex) then you must have linked to a different video.
...or maybe it was me. Let me check that link again - for research purposes.
According to YouTubes policy, material that may be age restricted includes...Do I think it was sexy? Yes. I like boobs. Especially those boobs.
But I don’t agree with your “a key component of sexy being the word sex” implication. Do you know how often people here describe chips as sexy?
Do you think that has anything to do with sex?
Popping a ping pong ball into cleavage is goofy, and maybe of questionable taste, but I don’t think there are any sexual implications there that need to be age restricted.
A video where the subject is in a pose that is intended to sexually arouse the viewer
It starts a little slow, but it picks up and I think the writing and acting is very good.just wasting my time I give up on Humans truly sad
I’ll agree with this, but I’d just add that you can draw a parallel to a heat of passion manslaughter situation. The difference between getting 10-20, or life without parole.Tangent. I find it interesting when people refer to Smith's actions, or similar actions, as "defending" someone. It was not defense. The "offense" (to any extent that it could be called an offense) had already occurred and was over. There was no danger to protect anyone from. The action was retribution. And when you realize that, it changes the color of the situation significantly and makes it really hard to justify it as some kind of noble act.
"Defending" her honor or something, because chivalry is not dead or something. I believe that honor is worth defending, but it should have come from Ms. Pinkett Smith herself. I thought that we were supposed to be tearing down the patriarchy or something? I get so confused.Tangent. I find it interesting when people refer to Smith's actions, or similar actions, as "defending" someone. It was not defense. The "offense" (to any extent that it could be called an offense) had already occurred and was over. There was no danger to protect anyone from. The action was retribution. And when you realize that, it changes the color of the situation significantly and makes it really hard to justify it as some kind of noble act.
Yeah nearly everything about this display was pure toxic masculinity."Defending" her honor or something, because chivalry is not dead or something. I believe that honor is worth defending, but it should have come from Ms. Pinkett Smith herself. I thought that we were supposed to be tearing down the patriarchy or something? I get so confused.
Though, I think that bringing back duels would be cool. I'm a fan.
Tiffany Haddish disagrees . . . Heyyy-ayyyyBTW, I don't think that most women want the men in their life to “defend” them this way.
I think that qualifies as a bit more than some cleavage lol
As long as it’s politicians I can get behind this. I think Lincoln was involved in a sword fight duel once, which is kinda cool. Obviously Hamilton/burr being the most famous incident.Though, I think that bringing back duels would be cool. I'm a fan.
"Defending" her honor or something, because chivalry is not dead or something. I believe that honor is worth defending, but it should have come from Ms. Pinkett Smith herself. I thought that we were supposed to be tearing down the patriarchy or something? I get so confused.
Though, I think that bringing back duels would be cool. I'm a fan.
I stopped holding the door for most strangers a few years ago, after multiple women in Seattle told me that they "didn't need a man's help." My response was always, "I hope that you have a better day." Then I usually got cursed at. To me, it's not about the patriarchy, or seeing women as weak. I honestly believe that women are better than men, and deserve more respect.
Ok, ok... this is not actually true. I do hold the door for everyone, and still take the occasional verbal beatdown from some man-hating women. It is what it is.I stopped holding the door for most strangers a few years ago, after multiple women in Seattle told me that they "didn't need a man's help." My response was always, "I hope that you have a better day." Then I usually got cursed at. To me, it's not about the patriarchy, or seeing women as weak. I honestly believe that women are better than men, and deserve more respect.
My exceptions are older folks, disabled (wheel chair, walker, etc.), or someone with their hands full...and all men.
That seems like it would be Gross lolNot sure about a sandwich but they go good with donuts. View attachment 886490
Ok, ok... this is not actually true. I do hold the door for everyone, and still take the occasional verbal beatdown from some man-hating women. It is what it is.
But the part about women being better than men: I do believe that.
Really sorry to see Will Smith behave this way. It surprised me, and I think less of him now.
The responses to his actions, both from association and from various defenders, sadly does not surprise me though. The long list of people who have ruined my ability to enjoy their art grows a little longer today.
BTW, I don't think that most women want the men in their life to “defend” them this way.
LolReally sorry to see Will Smith behave this way. It surprised me, and I think less of him now.
The responses to his actions, both from association and from various defenders, sadly does not surprise me though. The long list of people who have ruined my ability to enjoy their art grows a little longer today.
BTW, I don't think that most women want the men in their life to “defend” them this way.