Interested
I know I'm late to this but just wanted to throw my 2c out there. There is a tremendous waste in the current game lineup. There are 6 cards of pineapple variants where the only difference is when you discard your extra card. Especially the lazy pineapple where it's essentially super holdem but you can only use 2 of your hold cards. And then we have crazy pineapple 8 - why was crazy pineapple chosen for the split pot/low variant?
I think there should only be one pineapple card with a listing of the name change depending on when you discard instead of an individual card for each variant.
Pineapple - 3 cards down, discard after pre flop betting
Crazy pineapple - 3 cards down, discard after post flow betting
Very crazy pineapple - 3 cards down, discard after post turn betting
Lazy pineapple - 3 cards down, discard before showdown
Ludicrous pineapple - 4 cards down, discard one after post flop betting and one after post turn betting
View attachment 978034
I also think there should only be one "Hi/Lo' or "8" card which explains that the addition of the 8 to the name results in a split pot with lowest unique ranks A-8. And then there should be no more 8 variants printed. That would save another 6 cards. Literally the only difference is the 8 in the title and the last line of the instructions.
View attachment 978037
Then we can add true degen games like derailment, tic tac toe etc.
And most beginners get more confused about what makes a low or a 2-7 so a card giving more explanation on that rather than just "lowest unique ranks A-8" would be more helpful.
I know running a group buy like this is a lot of work and a thankless job so my intent was not to derail but more to consider those games that people like to play and enjoy rather that covering every variant. For example, I think I played pineapple once last weekend and only because it was chosen by someone who was not familiar with circus (and who never chose it again). I played derailment and dramaha zero countless times.
Perhaps some thought for the future - we have a vanilla deck with the simple games and an add-on "degen" deck with Route 66, derailment, tic tac toe etc.
-
In any case, put me down for 2 sets of the expansion pack.
I try to be explicit and I know sometimes it can come across short, I don't mean to. I want these to be perfect and I like your idea, I'm not sure if its viable if it takes me another 40 hours and I have to come up with all of the bits on my own lol. If every one chimes in it could take a while to sort it all out.
The focus of these from the start was to add games to lure in the children looking for candy
I like a 'Degen pack' and I like the re-org of 8 or better into a single card.
I'll scrap my current break down for something more useful that I can build on.
I still offer 2 sets, an 'add on' set for those that don't want to re-buy new cards I've produced, but those that want to buy all of them might enjoy a different classification, base set and a degen set.
Let's list out basic games for a base set:
3 Hand Holdem
Super Holdem
Double Board Holdem
Very Crazy Pineapple
Lazy Pineapple
Ludicrous Pineapple
Pineapple Stud
Fusion
SHESHE
SOHE
BIG O
imPLOcean
Courchevel
Archie
Triple Draw lowball
Razz
Holdout
Tahoe P&R
Chicago
Oxford Stud
Or give me clearly degen games (I won't be adding any new cards for those that don't exist but I'll have a burn down ready to go when I want to make a new set)
Scarney
Sviten
route 66 (no card)
God's game / dbl board omaha
badacey
badeucey
derailment (no card)
Super Stud
Shodugi
Stumpler
Dra2maha
Dra2maha Zero
Dra2maha 49
cowpie
Kentrel
Thermonuclear Armageddon Pineapple
Chowaha
4 Card Chowaha
Welcome to the party! So how can I convey that in 3 or 4 lines that fit on the card?So here are my confusions:
1, the low needs to be 5 cards following the rules of the game you are playing (i.e. for Holdem 8 you can use one, two or none of your down cards but for Omaha 8 you have to use two of your down cards. For example, in Omaha if there aren't 3 unique cards 8 or below on the board, there is no low.
2, Aces are 1 for the lo (and high for the hi)
3, straights and flushes do not count to the low (the nuts is A2345)
4, a pair means you don't have a low, card have to be unique
5, the best low hand is that with the lowest high card (i.e. a low with a 6 as the high card is better than a low with the 8 as a high card). This really gets me sometimes. Someone has A2348 and they're beaten by 34567.
California is rhetorical at that point then, no?You have one card which is just Triple Draw.
Then the second being one of these:
- Standard poker rankings (or no add on card)
- 8 or better
- California
- Kansas City (2-7)
- 49
- zero
- 21
- Badugi
According to this link: https://www.pagat.com/poker/variants/sviten.html Sviten is just DrawmahaSviten is just a slight variant of Drawmaha. Basically if you take a single card on the draw it comes face up, if you don't like it you can redraw and the second comes face down... other than that it is regular Drawmaha.
We don't really need a card for it, would just be nice as we play this game A LOT!
California lowball doesn't have the 8 qualifier.California is rhetorical at that point then, no?
how do I 'link' the two cards, just call the secondary card a 'Companion card' or 'rankings' card?
it is! but I agree, love a Scandinavian to chime in!According to this link: https://www.pagat.com/poker/variants/sviten.html Sviten is just Drawmaha
What you describe is referred to as "Sviten Special". Would be nice if our Scandinavian members can clarify!
I tend to agree. It’s not like a few extra cards takes up too much spaceWhile I understand and appreciate the desire for efficiency, I would not want a modular set of cards like that. I would want one card per game that I'm spreading, with the name of the game prominently displayed in a single unambiguous headline across the top of the card, to be put on the table in a prominent spot where all can see it when that specific and exact game is being played.
But others should weigh in; I'm not the target audience for these cards (as I mentioned elsewhere, I have my own already).
I think this very well-articulated and very appreciated.While I understand and appreciate the desire for efficiency, I would not want a modular set of cards like that. I would want one card per game that I'm spreading, with the name of the game prominently displayed in a single unambiguous headline across the top of the card, to be put on the table in a prominent spot where all can see it when that specific and exact game is being played.
But others should weigh in; I'm not the target audience for these cards (as I mentioned elsewhere, I have my own already).