I say we move on.
Hey did I tell anyone I just bought some more chips!
SQUIRREL!
Keep on chipping!
Hey did I tell anyone I just bought some more chips!
SQUIRREL!
Keep on chipping!
For all of our sakes, I hope these were not the chips you bought...I say we move on.
Hey did I tell anyone I just bought some more chips!
SQUIRREL!
Keep on chipping!
For all of our sakes, I hope these were not the chips you bought...
He bought chips off me and paid Davin - seriously u guys need to just drop it - Thank god I'm not a mentally ill human , this would be way too much - I made good on my debit and you guys just never stop - I just ask that this thread be removed and scammer be taken off of my name / rating - I agree it took long to pay - I'm 99 -% at fault . Can we please just stop the bashing ?I know this is up to @davin and the mods , but I wouldn't be too quick to change the title of, and/or delete, this thread... or adjust the feedback for a couple of reasons:
1. If we're being honest, @Mike mac never actually paid Davin -- @Klobberer paid him what he was owed, but that doesn't change the interactions between Mike and Davin... and if not for Klobberer stepping up (major props, by the way), it appears Davin would still be waiting for his payment.
2. There's an argument to be made to leave it up and unchanged for "the good of the community". Mike's behavior and actions, and those of Davin, speak for themselves during this issue. Shouldn't a new member of the forum be able to see what happened, and reference this, before they enter into any transaction with either one? Wouldn't changing the feedback to positive (or neutral) hide what actually happened here?
Like I said, it's not my decision to make but I'll be curious to see what happens.
I'd like to know what I did wrong, I've done only good in this community please justify what I did was wrong that would affect someone dealing with me in futureI know this is up to @davin and the mods , but I wouldn't be too quick to change the title of, and/or delete, this thread... or adjust the feedback for a couple of reasons:
1. If we're being honest, @Mike mac never actually paid Davin -- @Klobberer paid him what he was owed, but that doesn't change the interactions between Mike and Davin... and if not for Klobberer stepping up (major props, by the way), it appears Davin would still be waiting for his payment.
2. There's an argument to be made to leave it up and unchanged for "the good of the community". Mike's behavior and actions, and those of Davin, speak for themselves during this issue. Shouldn't a new member of the forum be able to see what happened, and reference this, before they enter into any transaction with either one? Wouldn't changing the feedback to positive (or neutral) hide what actually happened here?
Like I said, it's not my decision to make but I'll be curious to see what happens.
You do know this thread would never have happened if you simply paid before it got this, like a real adult, or at the least paid up when called out instead of denying and then requiring a third party get involved?He bought chips off me and paid Davin - seriously u guys need to just drop it - Thank god I'm not a mentally ill human , this would be way too much - I made good on my debit and you guys just never stop - I just ask that this thread be removed and scammer be taken off of my name / rating - I agree it took long to pay - I'm 99 -% at fault . Can we please just stop the bashing ?
The only problem I had with what you did was the posting of his personal information. I understand why you did it but I do not agree with that stuff being posted. There are a lot of weirdo's on the internet that could use that information to cause physical harm to him or his family.I'd like to know what I did wrong, I've done only good in this community please justify what I did was wrong that would affect someone dealing with me in future
Title changedA truly negative experience, like the one @davin had with @Mike mac should stay on the record.
However, now that the debt has been actually paid by the latter member, the word "scammer" is inappropriate and unfair. "Late payer" or "payment after seeking assistance from the community, in public" would be more precise.
Let's stick to the facts and anyway characterize behaviours, not people.
So soliciting a loan is waaaaaay different than asking for credit...
So soliciting a loan is waaaaaay different than asking for credit...
*But* you have Rogers?! Isn't that like the AT&T of Canada? You couldn't get texts in the US with Rogers?