Hustler Casino Live (3 Viewers)

a hot woman
200.gif
 
Accusations of cheating in poker are extremely serious, and I think Garrett is way, way out of line for making such an evidence-free accusation based on one highly unusual, badly played hand. His argument boils down to "She didn't play the hand the way I think she should have, therefore she was cheating."

She didn't help herself with her bizarre behavior after the hand, but that can be explained by a lot of other reasons besides cheating.

If she's a cheat, she's a horrible one. And there are a lot more horrible poker players than horrible poker cheats.
 
She played the hand like someone who learned the game 10 minutes ago despite having a decent amount of experience in the game from what I understand.

Her excuse of saying “but I had the best hand” seems like gaslighting because she knows full well that while J high was technically the best hand at showdown, there’s almost no chance of that being the best hand when she called. What the hands were at showdown is almost irrelevant.

She’s framing the hand as if was her chance to “take a stand” against Garrett’s aggressive play but I don’t think even the fishiest of fish would choose that spot to pick off a bluff.

Yea, this is probably the biggest issue for me with the “she’s just retarded at poker and had no idea what she was doing in that spot and made a stupid decision and it worked out” argument.

For some one who’s retarded at poker she sure is running net positive at the highest stakes there are in one of the biggest live streams ever.

There’s nothing about this argument that follows. Especially if she’s being backed by Rip. Would you give your girlfriend who’s dumb at cards $100,000 to play retard-poker just for the lulz?

Occoms Razor… she’s retarded at poker and running net positive on multiple streams against top tier pros because luck? Yea. Ok.
 
Yea, this is probably the biggest issue for me with the “she’s just retarded at poker and made a stupid decision and it worked out” argument.

For some one who’s retarded at poker she sure is running net positive at the highest stakes there are in one of the biggest live streams ever.

There’s nothing about this argument that follows. Especially if she’s being backed by Rip. Would you give your girlfriend who’s dumb at cards $100,000 to play retard-poker just for the lulz?
These games are often very soft. She has a very small sample size. I don't think we can really conclude one way or another if she cheated or not. There are very plausible explanations both ways. I leave about 60-40 of not cheating. Just a combination of entitlement, embarrassment, arrogance, being a female in a male dominated environment, and stupidity being the main factors.

But I also would not be surprised at all if she actually cheated.
 
These games are often very soft. She has a very small sample size. I don't think we can really conclude one way or another if she cheated or not. There are very plausible explanations both ways. I leave about 60-40 of not cheating. Just a combination of entitlement, embarrassment, arrogance, being a female in a male dominated environment, and stupidity being the main factors.

But I also would not be surprised at all if she actually cheated.

Totally agree! And to clarify, I also agree that the cheating side has a shitload of holes too.

I just have a hard time crediting that pot to “reee - cuz she dumb” vibes.
 
Occoms Razor… she’s retarded at poker and running net positive on multiple streams against top tier pros because luck? Yea. Ok.
It was idiocy on her part to make the call with J4 whether she was cheating or not.

If you're arguing that she's good enough to be a winning high stakes player, she's certainly good enough to know that she can NEVER call his shove there. And she knows there will be many other spots to get her stack in where she has a lock on the hand and she doesn't arouse suspicion.

So either she's a bad player who played a hand badly, or she's a cheating crusher who chose the worst possible spot she could have to stack off with a suspicious hand that was only a flip against her opponent?

Occam's razor indeed.
 
Also, some of you guys are fucking lame. Always taking the low road. Making derogatory comments about her appearance is an indication of your character, not hers.
I’m just hopping in here but I have to disagree with us. If it looks like a duck (in this case duck face), walks like a duck, talks like a duck… it’s usually a duck.

Everything about her is fake. Fake lips fake cheeks, fake tits, accompanied by the typical low cut top to show as much cleavage as possible. I mean, I’m no prude, it’s totally fine to do that. However, an overwhelming amount of people who look like her are narcissists, or have histrionic personality disorder. So, technically, her appearance DOES say something about her character. People here aren’t talking about someone’s natural looks that they can’t control, they’re talking about her godawful plastic surgery.

Doesn’t exactly play into whether or not she actually cheated or not, hell I’m still undecided myself. But you can’t say that how someone presents by how they dress, or “look” says nothing about their character. Most, not all, but most of the people at that table present through their clothes/tatts etc either how they want to be perceived, or how they are.
 
I’m just hopping in here but I have to disagree with us. If it looks like a duck (in this case duck face), walks like a duck, talks like a duck… it’s usually a duck.

Everything about her is fake. Fake lips fake cheeks, fake tits, accompanied by the typical low cut top to show as much cleavage as possible. I mean, I’m no prude, it’s totally fine to do that. However, an overwhelming amount of people who look like her are narcissists, or have histrionic personality disorder. So, technically, her appearance DOES say something about her character. People here aren’t talking about someone’s natural looks that they can’t control, they’re talking about her godawful plastic surgery.

Doesn’t exactly play into whether or not she actually cheated or not, hell I’m still undecided myself. But you can’t say that how someone presents by how they dress, or “look” says nothing about their character. Most, not all, but most of the people at that table present through their clothes/tatts etc either how they want to be perceived, or how they are.
So you watched a 2 min clip of this woman and you have her figured out? Your immediate judgment of her based solely on her appearance is pretty fucked up.

You realize this type of judgment is along the same spectrum as slut shaming? Ie. She was dressed like a slut so if she got raped she brought it upon herself.

Some people care about their appearance and some don't give a fuck. Your perception, judgment, and condemnation of someone's supposed personality based solely on their appearance speaks nothing of that individual. That's your perception of that person based on the prism of your own life views. That's not actually reality. You realize you admit to judging people based on clothing and tatoos? That's fucked up.
 
So you watched a 2 min clip of this woman and you have her figured out? Your immediate judgment of her based solely on her appearance is pretty fucked up.

You realize this type of judgment is along the same spectrum as slut shaming? Ie. She was dressed like a slut so if she got raped she brought it upon herself.

Some people care about their appearance and some don't give a fuck. Your perception, judgment, and condemnation of someone's supposed personality based solely on their appearance speaks nothing of that individual. That's your perception of that person based on the prism of your own life views. That's not actually reality. You realize you admit to judging people based on clothing and tatoos? That's fucked up.
EVERYONE judges people based on their appearance. You may not say it out loud, or write it in a forum. But if you think you don't do it, even subconsciously, then you're only lying to yourself.
 
EVERYONE judges people based on their appearance. You may not say it out loud, or write it in a forum. But if you think you don't do it, even subconsciously, then you're only lying to yourself.
But maybe we should at least try not to?

@JScott writing like he has the correct answer in hand after watching her play poker for a few hours is pretty BS regardless.
 
I've heard about judging a book by its cover but well done @JScott, taking it to the next level... Writing a book review based on the cover...? An essay based on the cover...?
 
EVERYONE judges people based on their appearance. You may not say it out loud, or write it in a forum. But if you think you don't do it, even subconsciously, then you're only lying to yourself.
People absolutely have ingrained bias.

But it's one thing to have bias, acknowledge it, and recognize you have no actual basis to pass judgment; and another to immediately pass judgment with no actual information.

There's a difference.
 
So you watched a 2 min clip of this woman and you have her figured out? Your immediate judgment of her based solely on her appearance is pretty fucked up.

You realize this type of judgment is along the same spectrum as slut shaming? Ie. She was dressed like a slut so if she got raped she brought it upon herself.

Some people care about their appearance and some don't give a fuck. Your perception, judgment, and condemnation of someone's supposed personality based solely on their appearance speaks nothing of that individual. That's your perception of that person based on the prism of your own life views. That's not actually reality. You realize you admit to judging people based on clothing and tatoos? That's fucked up.
Insert that escalated quickly gif
 
I’m just hopping in here but I have to disagree with us. If it looks like a duck (in this case duck face), walks like a duck, talks like a duck… it’s usually a duck.

Everything about her is fake. Fake lips fake cheeks, fake tits, accompanied by the typical low cut top to show as much cleavage as possible. I mean, I’m no prude, it’s totally fine to do that. However, an overwhelming amount of people who look like her are narcissists, or have histrionic personality disorder. So, technically, her appearance DOES say something about her character. People here aren’t talking about someone’s natural looks that they can’t control, they’re talking about her godawful plastic surgery.

Doesn’t exactly play into whether or not she actually cheated or not, hell I’m still undecided myself. But you can’t say that how someone presents by how they dress, or “look” says nothing about their character. Most, not all, but most of the people at that table present through their clothes/tatts etc either how they want to be perceived, or how they are.

Preach! And it's not just her fucked up appearance that SHE CHOSE. The way she moves, her mannerisms, everything about her is creepy as fuck
 
So you watched a 2 min clip of this woman and you have her figured out? Your immediate judgment of her based solely on her appearance is pretty fucked up.

You realize this type of judgment is along the same spectrum as slut shaming? Ie. She was dressed like a slut so if she got raped she brought it upon herself.

Some people care about their appearance and some don't give a fuck. Your perception, judgment, and condemnation of someone's supposed personality based solely on their appearance speaks nothing of that individual. That's your perception of that person based on the prism of your own life views. That's not actually reality. You realize you admit to judging people based on clothing and tatoos? That's fucked up.
Like @TX_Golf_N_Poker said. We all do. Just because you want to virtual signal doesn’t mean you don’t judge people based on appearances.

Or that there’s no validity in it. You don’t get the whole picture of course. But to say that the way you present yourself means nothing is so very naive. Something I’d expect from a 21 year old liberal arts student with no world view.
But maybe we should at least try not to?

@JScott writing like he has the correct answer in hand after watching her play poker for a few hours is pretty BS regardless.
Except I never fucking said that, so… I literally said I don’t know if she cheated or not. What I DID say is that people present a certain way, and it’s usually to project yourself in a manner.

Not to mention it’s just psychology that those that get a lot of plastic surgery are typically narcissists or have body dysmorphia.
I've heard about judging a book by its cover but well done @JScott, taking it to the next level... Writing a book review based on the cover...? An essay based on the cover...?
You might not be able to judge a book by it’s cover. But you don’t pick up a playboy and expect Plutarch.
 
People absolutely have ingrained bias.

But it's one thing to have bias, acknowledge it, and recognize you have no actual basis to pass judgment; and another to immediately pass judgment with no actual information.

There's a difference.
To add on here. You admit everyone has ingrained bias, even yourself. And that’s correct, what you’re wrong about is denying that that exists and thinking that’s the way we should all act.

Not to mention there is an actual basis for this, we’re not saying that everyone with a tattoo is a criminal. People who get loads of plastic surgery are statistically more likely to be narcissists. Doesn’t say they’re cheaters and may not be even relevant here. What I’m saying is you CAN tell something about people based on appearance.
 
Why isnt anyone just asking this?

If you had one shot, one opportunity…wait, that’s Eminem.

If you could pick one spot to cheat, would you want to do it with a card to come as a 7% underdog?

If she cheated, she’s the worst cheater in poker history. She cheated to get the worst of it. That actually makes LESS sense than her ridiculous call with J4.
 
Why isnt anyone just asking this?

If you had one shot, one opportunity…wait, that’s Eminem.

If you could pick one spot to cheat, would you want to do it with a card to come as a 7% underdog?

If she cheated, she’s the worst cheater in poker history. She cheated to get the worst of it. That actually makes LESS sense than her ridiculous call with J4.
My understanding is that the deckmates 2 know deck order and if used unethically can tell you which hand is winning. There are basically scams where a player can know they are winning before the board cards come out. It’s why some people are so uneasy playing in games with deckmate 2s. Not saying she was doing this but it is a thing that has been documented in crooked private games in the LA area in particular.
 
Why isnt anyone just asking this?

If you had one shot, one opportunity…wait, that’s Eminem.

If you could pick one spot to cheat, would you want to do it with a card to come as a 7% underdog?

If she cheated, she’s the worst cheater in poker history. She cheated to get the worst of it. That actually makes LESS sense than her ridiculous call with J4.

This is all assuming she had perfect information. What if all she received was a signal that she was ahead or behind, and nothing more?

FYI, I’m leaning towards it was a donk move and she simply screwed up.
 
Last edited:
So either she's a bad player who played a hand badly, or she's a cheating crusher who chose the worst possible spot she could have to stack off with a suspicious hand that was only a flip against her opponent?

Occam's razor indeed.

All I’m saying is that the “she’s dumb and got lucky” argument makes no sense given her playing history and net winnings, and only serves to explain this one hand inside a vaccuum.

As for whether she’s a cheating crusher or a bad player making bad decisions… how about neither? She could be a total shill who merely acts based on BTO input.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account and join our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom